Africa a little 100 years ago.

[UpAndComing]

As much as the history books love to lie, White dominance really only began beginning around 1850

They love to tell stories of domination, but whites were in-fighting for damn near 1000 years before they got it together. America before 1850 was still a rising country trying to find its identity after breaking away from England. Europe was still trading with other countries constantly trying to build resources. Industrial Revolution changed everything
Europe was able to mass produce weapons to enforce racism

Between 1200 and 1800, there were still alot of African civilizations. But CACs like to teach us that after Egypt, we were swinging from Trees and in Huts until Christopher Columbus came
Only until 1850, did the European start cutting through all countries around the world in Africa, Asia, and South America

They used all of those resources they gathered from the world to fund economic systems, get stolen science and reclaim it as their own for "new inventions", destroyed most of the history books to make them the victor of every story, told whoever they conquered that "history started with us, before us you were savages"

 

[get these nets]

Why is it that Africans are the only
Group that has to be “united” in order to be successful. But Korea, China, Japan operate in competition....

Germany, UK, France operate in competition until the “European union”....

Yeah, history tells us that "Europe" only united under the Roman Catholic Church, but the countries within that continent fought wars and conflicts with each other for centuries after that.

Human history and human nature tells us that SEPARATE ethnic groups and nation states are going to have conflicts/wars over resources, but people throw that out the window when discussing African history.

Now, we are supposed to learn from history and consolidate when it's time to do so, and the 20th century independence movement across Africa demonstrated Pan African thoughts and action. But this could've, would've, should've talk doesn't take reality into account.

Euros studied EVERYTHING about the groups they colonized before hand..INCLUDING past conflicts, rivalries, and bad blood. The "borders" drawn up during the carving of Africa were based on this information.

 

[Freedman]

lol

Man do people think anymore ?


None of those countries existed when they were invaded first and foremost , so rather than invading a country , you are invading small kingdoms

Secondly please someone tell me with all the thousands of wars has Europe ever been united against a common enemy ? so why should Africa be any better ?

some of you want to feel inferior so bad its laughable

I think the rest of Europe all joined a coalition against France at one point during the French Revolution/Napoleon Wars and the Crusades against the Islamic Caliphates

 

[Nemesis]

Some of them like Mali, Benin, Kongo, etc were fairly large and organised kingdoms.

you are talking about places that had populations in the hundreds of thousands

why is it when some of you are given correct information rather than be happy you want to prevail in ignorance?

Ive never understood it, maybe you should go and read about what the British done during the war with the Benin empire


I apologise if I dont share the same inferiority complex that you do

 

[Amestafuu (Emeritus)]

As much as the history books love to lie, White dominance really only began beginning around 1850

They love to tell stories of domination, but whites were in-fighting for damn near 1000 years before they got it together. America before 1850 was still a rising country trying to find its identity after breaking away from England. Europe was still trading with other countries constantly trying to build resources. Industrial Revolution changed everything
Europe was able to mass produce weapons to enforce racism

Between 1200 and 1800, there were still alot of African civilizations. But CACs like to teach us that after Egypt, we were swinging from Trees and in Huts until Christopher Columbus came
Only until 1850, did the European start cutting through all countries around the world in Africa, Asia, and South America

They used all of those resources they gathered from the world to fund economic systems, get stolen science and reclaim it as their own for "new inventions", destroyed most of the history books to make them the victor of every story, told whoever they conquered that "history started with us, before us you were savages"

they like documenting history from the point it suits them that's why we don't learn about the thousand year occupation of southern europe

the pages just seem to blank when convenient

white people have been ahead of us when it comes to espionage and propaganda going back to Alexander and we will never know what he was trying to hide in those documents they burned. we can only speculate it wasn't convenient for them.

 

[The War Report]

May this forever be a reminder of what happens when you're not united. You have to unite against a common enemy. Not war with each other even more. Not sell your people to the common enemy. The whole world was coming to destroy our ancestors, and they couldn't squash their beefs to fight the common enemy.

Africa is a huge ass continent. When has Europe been united in anything?

 

[Cobalt Sire]

Most countries on the continent today have no ties to the TAS trade. that's a fact. The map you linked is a general Slave Trade map route out of Africa that includes routes used to The Arabic Slave trade.

The arrows show the destinations of both TAS and Arabic Slave trade which predates the TAS trade and was build on kidnapping rather than selling of people mostly. It also continue after TAS was abolished into the modern era.

People were being kidnapped and sold to non-blacks in every part of the continent. This weakened the continent, even though not every nation participated. It made colonization much easier.

 

[get these nets]

I think the rest of Europe all joined a coalition against France at one point during the French Revolution/Napoleon Wars and the Crusades against the Islamic Caliphates

yes, the Crusades were under the banner of the RCC and the Pope............and Napolean wanted to rule that part of the world (Africans in Haiti stopped the cash cow that was helping to fuel/fund those conquests,though)

But other than that European countries were at each other's throats for centuries.

 

[Amestafuu (Emeritus)]

People were being kidnapped and sold to non-blacks in every part of the continent. This weakened the continent, even though not every nation participated. It made colonization much easier.

It also helps that England, France, Germany, Russia etc were nations that had intermarried family member into leadership to build ties and bonds. So as much as they were rivals at home they had similar goals abroad. Thus them carving out the continent like pieces of pie.

We will never out malicious white people, that isn't our goal or nature.

 

[Cobalt Sire]

Africa is a huge ass continent. When has Europe been united in anything?

Europe is a continent as well. For starters, they were united by religion. When they had their own slavery, they didn't allow their people to get sold to outsiders. Smart move. "Demand from the Islamic world dominated the slave trade in medieval Europe.[11][12][13][14] For most of that time, however, sale of Christian slaves to non-Christians was banned.[citation needed] In the pactum Lotharii of 840 between Venice and the Carolingian Empire, Venice promised not to buy Christian slaves in the Empire, and not to sell Christian slaves to Muslims.[11][15][16] The Church prohibited the export of Christian slaves to non-Christian lands, for example in the Council of Koblenz in 922, the Council of London in 1102, and the Council of Armagh in 1171.[17]"

Slavery in medieval Europe - Wikipedia

And you can bet your life savings that if other places adopted Christianity, they would have come up with another way to stop white slaves from being sold to outsiders.

 

[Nemesis]

Yeah, history tells us that "Europe" only united under the Roman Catholic Church, but the countries within that continent fought wars and conflicts with each other for centuries after that.

Human history and human nature tells us that SEPARATE ethnic groups and nation states are going to have conflicts/wars over resources, but people throw that out the window when discussing African history.

Now, we are supposed to learn from history and consolidate when it's time to do so, and the 20th century independence movement across Africa demonstrated Pan African thoughts and action. But this could've, would've, should've talk doesn't take reality into account.

Euros studied EVERYTHING about the groups they colonized before hand..INCLUDING past conflicts, rivalries, and bad blood. The "borders" drawn up during the carving of Africa were based on this information.

Fam the problem with a lot of remedial people on this board is that their only source of history is the white man ....

If i came in here and posted the white mans history of the United States they would be up in arms ....

I have actually been to these places to see where these Kingdoms once were , and I learnt the history from the indigenes of these places


A lot of people have an inferiority complex , and it seems to bother them that others dont have that feeling , so they try and do this thing where they think that maybe if they show you how fukked the place you are from or your people are you might feel like them

it never works .... I do not want to be anything else , Im proud as fukk , and the funny thing is I never even need to shyt on any one to feel good about myself and where Im from

work on your self esteem

 

[TheSpook]

It also helps that England, France, Germany, Russia etc were nations that had intermarried family member into leadership to build ties and bonds. So as much as they were rivals at home they had similar goals abroad. Thus them carving out the continent like pieces of pie.

We will never out malicious white people, that isn't our goal or nature.

Last sentence is bullshyt. Power is power and blacks crave it as much as whites. You get it how you get it even by malicious means. History has taught us blacks are as malicious as they come.

 

[mykey]

you are talking about places that had populations in the hundreds of thousands

why is it when some of you are given correct information rather than be happy you want to prevail in ignorance?

Ive never understood it, maybe you should go and read about what the British done during the war with the Benin empire


I apologise if I dont share the same inferiority complex that you do

I'am very much aware what the evil Brits did; they committed genocide in the Kingdom of Benin in 1897. They then looted some 4,000 pieces of art which have never been returned upto today.

 

[mykey]

Last sentence is bullshyt. Power is power and blacks crave it as much as whites. You get it how you get it even by malicious means. History has taught us blacks are as malicious as they come.

Interesting username you have there.

 

[Amestafuu (Emeritus)]

Last sentence is bullshyt. Power is power and blacks crave it as much as whites. You get it how you get it even by malicious means. History has taught us blacks are as malicious as they come.

.
stop quoting me breh. history never taught me that.

I'm not here for arguments just discussion... your name and rep is already raising flags so I don't want no conversation with you... I smell agent activity