↓R↑LYB
I trained Sheng Long and Shonuff
The media has to be more responsible for what they put out. That's what I said... and it should be both on the parents and media to limit access to this sort of violent content. With that said, we have to be careful lest we start walking the line of censorship. You open the door for bannings of one kind and it leaves the door wide open for bannings of other kind.
It may be easier to kill with an AR15, but it's also a lot easier for the government to put the clamps on people who have no ability to fight back. Widespread censorship and removing gun ownership sounds eerily like a lot of Chinese regimes. I'll take the occasional nutcase over a governmental machine of mind control and brutal suppression.
So again, your solution to these mass shootings that's been going on is for parents to be parents and for the media to be more responsible? How should the media be responsible? Should they chose to willingly not show violent movies, tv shows, games, music, etc? And how are the parents to be held responsible if their 25 year old son goes and legally buys an M16 and shoots up a day care?
In your opinion can anything be done? So far you said don't place restrictions on guns and don't place restrictions on the media.
Like I said earlier, this is the problem with this debate. Gun advocates seem to keep saying either A) leave everything alone or B) have more guns on the streets.


