With all the flooding and coast lines as we know them disappearing, I'm calling the next real estate boom, beach front property....in Idaho.
Fixed.

With all the flooding and coast lines as we know them disappearing, I'm calling the next real estate boom, beach front property....in Idaho.
Im not blaming emerging economies. My point was that even if we scale back our use of oil and gas, countries like China will be there to step in and grow their consumption, especially if prices fall on weak western demand. The entire world needs to rethink the way we power our lives, not just the US.Too easy a cop-out breh, developped countries have been polluting heavily for decades now, too easy to point the finger at emerging countries now as sole culprits.
Dirty deeds: The world's biggest polluters by country | GlobalPost
3 out of 5 of the biggest polluters are not emerging economies. US became second only in 2006.
This means what exactly. they're going to have to push beach front property back 10 feet?
I wonder if this is acutally true.More like, major cities on the coast or at sea level are going to need huge sea walls or it's a wrap for them.
![]()
A 10 foot raise in sea levels around the world is massive.
I wonder if this is acutally true.
Maybe they should just punch a hole in the bottom of the ocean and drain the water into the earth.Wow i think i just saved the planet friend?
Im not blaming emerging economies. My point was that even if we scale back our use of oil and gas, countries like China will be there to step in and grow their consumption, especially if prices fall on weak western demand. The entire world needs to rethink the way we power our lives, not just the US.
Of course, but a lot of people point the finger at inaction from Washington and other industrialized nations' governments. Given news like this coming out, there is not much anyone can do at all in the short-term to stop this, even if everyone was on the same page. This problem started a long time time ago and we are starting to see the effects of it now. While it would be somewhat hypocritical to tell a country like China to halt their growth by cutting their expanding use of fossil fuels, this will also be their problem going forward. Tough choices ahead...I hear you, but I ain't asking anything from emerging countries before the US and the EU as a whole get their shyt together, since their economic success is largely based on intensive use of natural resources and huge pollution. Too easy for them to enjoy that success and tell others what they should do (again).
I see, well that didnt look like it was going to far up the coastline friend. I think we'll be okIt's true, it's pretty just simple math for them to determine coastal flooding based on a sea level rise.
Punch a hole in the ocean? Friend what if they release Cloverfield, Godzilla, Kaijus or Cthulhu?
Of course, but a lot of people point the finger at inaction from Washington and other industrialized nations' governments. Given news like this coming out, there is not much anyone can do at all in the short-term to stop this, even if everyone was on the same page. This problem started a long time time ago and we are starting to see the effects of it now. While it would be somewhat hypocritical to tell a country like China to halt their growth by cutting their expanding use of fossil fuels, this will also be their problem going forward. Tough choices ahead...
Kind of self-serving to assume that there will be no technological advances going forward that can change the equation. There just needs to be a substantial financial commitment to do so.It's over brehs.
The idea that alternative energy sources such as wind, solar, etc., are an adequate substitute for fossil fuels is a fantasy. As MIT professor Daniel Nocera has shown, even if all known alternative resources plus nuclear power (see below) are tapped to their practical limits, and current fossil fuel consumption stays constant, we’ll barely have enough juice to provide the world’s billions with (on average) a Poland-level lifestyle by 2050.
Yes, nuclear power is one long-term energy source that hasn’t yet been maximized. But in Nocera’s analysis, just to keep up with expected demand over the next 40 years we’d have to open an additional nuclear power plant every two days.
The Straight Dope: Followup: Why don't we ditch nukes <em>and</em> coal?