Oh yeah because Curry has been only doing this for five games of his career.
Better player: Curry or Iverson?
- Thread starter SpursFanSinceNovember2017
- Start date
-
- Tags
- allen iverson steph curry
Oh yeah because Curry has been only doing this for five games of his career.
Iverson averaged over 30 a game multiple seasons. You dummies trying to compare curry's career which isn't even half way over to iverson's total career. AI is a first ballot HOF player. The comparison in itself is stupid. And iverson was more dominate thought out his entire career by the way. Curry has been dominate for a little over ONE season
sure we've seen plenty of his bricks
low percentage shooting nikka
Prime example of an in the moment ass nikka
No we're not, you dummy.
Curry's dominance is on another level to what AI showed at any point during his career. That's why dudes say he's the better player.AI is a first ballot HOF player. The comparison in itself is stupid. And iverson was more dominate thought out his entire career by the way. Curry has been dominate for a little over ONE season
that's subjective. Curry is playing on a way better team. If the Warriors were 2-10 or 6-6 and Curry put up the same stats with a weak roster would people look at him the same? I think not. Winning makes you see shyt differently. Iverson dominated against better competition as well. But it is what I is. Some people think Kobe is better than MJ or Lebron better than Kobe. There is no right answer. I saw most of the greats in the 80's and 90's play in their prime years. Iverson revolutionized the game, and he was by far the fastest player when he played. And he was only 6'0 165lbs so every player that guarded him was bigger. I'm not knocking Curry, I just think it's dumb to compare him to AI because they did different things and played differently roles on their team.fifth column
Superstar
Show me the receipts
sportscribe
Superstar
I saw him play, and I would take Curry without even thinking it over.
Most of the posters arguing for AI can't make a sound basketball reason why they'd pick him, it's all nostalgia.
Wanna bring out the stats?
I already pulled out the stats in the thread breh. Curry is a better 3 point shooter.
- 11× NBA All-Star (2000–2010)
- 2× NBA All-Star Game MVP (2001, 2005)
- 3× All-NBA First Team (1999, 2001, 2005)
- 3× All-NBA Second Team (2000, 2002–2003)
- 4× NBA scoring champion (1999, 2001–2002, 2005)
- 3× NBA steals leader (2001–2003)
Ya'll nikkas talking about Iverson like he's Mookie Blaylock
this.
Really?. I've gave numerous reasons throughout this thread.
I already pulled out the stats in the thread breh. Curry is a better 3 point shooter.
- 11× NBA All-Star (2000–2010)
- 2× NBA All-Star Game MVP (2001, 2005)
- 3× All-NBA First Team (1999, 2001, 2005)
- 3× All-NBA Second Team (2000, 2002–2003)
- 4× NBA scoring champion (1999, 2001–2002, 2005)
His regular season career scoring average of 26.7 points per game ranks sixth all-time, and his playoff career scoring average of 29.7 points per game is second only to Michael Jordan.
- 3× NBA steals leader (2001–2003)
Ya'll nikkas talking about Iverson like he's Mookie Blaylock
Those aren't stats, they are accolades.
Curry is shooting a better percentage from three than Iverson did from the field, that kind of stat.....
Iverson's usage rate also ranks 3rd in NBA history, and hes' by far the least efficient player among top 10 usage rates.
Iverson wore arm sleeves, how is that not basketball related