Kinda like that "The manning brothers will never win a super bowl" or the Russell Wilson fiascoThis thread will only become more and more embarrassing as the years go by.
Let's see curry lead the league in scoring once, and then three more times before saying he's a better scorer.
Curry relies heavily on threes so he yea he scores more on less shots naturally. And he's more efficient cause he's just a better outside shooter. I think most would agree he's the best all time.
On top of this, He has great teammates to set him up for easy shots/open looks and occupy defenses from focusing on him.
Curry sits because the WARRIORS are a good team not because he's that great of a player.
Iverson never had that luxury so he had to work much harder for his points. He took more shots/more contested shots and lay ups. of course he missed more. But he always found ways to score. And he scored in more creative dynamic ways than currys because his size, speed, athleticism and handle.
Iversons a better one on on isolation player. He was the whole offense.
That's why they called him the Answer
Curry is a great team scorer who scores within the offense. He's good working with teammates
Curry Has Klay whenever he's having an off nightand draymonds the team leader
Iverson was klay Draymond and curry on his Sixers teams.
Plus iverson could actually dunk
#WPOY2016 read this bullshyt @Malta and keep in mind everyone this same clown thinks penny is better than LeBron even when penny's best season is worse than LeBron's worstLet's see curry lead the league in scoring once, and then three more times before saying he's a better scorer.
Curry relies heavily on threes so he yea he scores more on less shots naturally. And he's more efficient cause he's just a better outside shooter. I think most would agree he's the best all time.
On top of this, He has great teammates to set him up for easy shots/open looks and occupy defenses from focusing on him.
Curry sits because the WARRIORS are a good team not because he's that great of a player.
Iverson never had that luxury so he had to work much harder for his points. He took more shots/more contested shots and lay ups. of course he missed more. But he always found ways to score. And he scored in more creative dynamic ways than currys because his size, speed, athleticism and handle.
Iversons a better one on on isolation player. He was the whole offense.
That's why they called him the Answer
Curry is a great team scorer who scores within the offense. He's good working with teammates
Curry Has Klay whenever he's having an off night
Iverson was klay Draymond and curry on his Sixers teams.
Plus iverson could actually dunk
iverson still ranks higher.
but curry is on pace to pass him up.
majority of the team played the same way. its not that iverson & melo as a duo didnt work. they couldve did more if they put more people around them that filled the voids that they left - which they went on to do the following year. they brought in alot more than just chauncey billups.
thats why the billups trade is one of the most overblown things in basketball history. he was far from the only change to that roster. and on top of that, they benefited from playing in a weaker western conference. really, they only won about 5 more games than the iverson team. and they got easy draws in the 1st & 2nd rounds.
people never talk about the following season, when the west picked back up.
He wouldn't need to play 1v5 like AI for the Sixers to win. He would just need to play like himself. Per 36 minutes that both of them were on the court - Curry takes 20.9 shots to score 31.7 ppg and Iverson took 21.9 shots to score 26.7 points - that's FIVE extra points Curry scores (on one less shot) in equal amount of time they're on the court. The points per shot differential and the added defensive attention Curry would have (teams would soon start guarding him behind the arc - allowing his teammates more room to operate) would put that 76ers squad in a better position of winning. Not to mention Curry was a better playmaker, by quite a significant margin.
He wouldn't need to play 1v5 like AI for the Sixers to win. He would just need to play like himself. Per 36 minutes that both of them were on the court - Curry takes 20.9 shots to score 31.7 ppg and Iverson took 21.9 shots to score 26.7 points - that's FIVE extra points Curry scores (on one less shot) in equal amount of time they're on the court. The points per shot differential and the added defensive attention Curry would have (teams would soon start guarding him behind the arc - allowing his teammates more room to operate) would put that 76ers squad in a better position of winning. Not to mention Curry was a better playmaker, by quite a significant margin.
AI took 29 shots to score 32 ppg (38% shooting) en route to the Finals, and you don't think Curry couldn't put up 32 points if he had 29 shots a game?
you right
curry making nikkas like arron mckie and eric snow into all-stars
dem #'s
