Bill Burr is a real one. He called the Rittenhouse situation LAST YEAR

[Trust Me]

The jury was still presented more than enough evidence to make a decision. The judge is irrelevant to me, as long as the jury got to hear and see all of the relevant evidence. The jury got to see multiple videos of the shootings, and got to hear witness testimony from those involved except the 2 deceased individuals.

They got to hear the prosecution's closing arguments and the closing statements from the defense.
It's all on them now.

Just by this quote right here.. you have absolutely NO idea how the judicial system ‘works’


The judge is irrelevant? What. The. fukk?

 

[saturn7]

Just by this quote right here.. you have absolutely NO idea how the judicial system ‘works’


The judge is irrelevant? What. The. fukk?

Yes the judge is irrelevant the evidence is most important thing. The jury still has to make their decision based on the evidence they saw and heard. Not based on how the judge feels or wants.

When the judge was scolding the prosecutors the Jury was not present.

 

[Sauce Dab]

It's gun owners getting their panties in a bunch if anything.

So many Gun owners are mentally unstable. “B...b...b... my rights “

 

[Trust Me]

Yes the judge is irrelevant the evidence is most important thing. The jury still has to make their decision based on the evidence they saw and heard. Not based on how the judge feels or wants.

When the judge was scolding the prosecutors the Jury was not present.

Let me ask you a question and put it bluntly. Do you not think the judge has the ability to put pressure on jurors?

Edit: Its a rhetorical question. I've witnessed it with my own eyes and ears, after trials have been concluded.

 

[NoMoreWhiteWoman2020]

@saturn7 if I go into a hood waving around guns, first of all I’m not getting the benefit of the doubt. If you are “protecting properties”, how do you end up killing two people that weren’t on that company property?

You can’t walk around with a gun looking for trouble. He didn’t protect any peace. He created more unrest. He should be buried under the jail.
If I went to Klan march and shot them up and said they were threatening me, what do you think they would do to me?

 

[Gold]

Him being there doesn't automatically make him guilty. Because YOU or I believe he shouldn't be there doesn't make him guilty. Liberals like to use the "but he was carrying a gun" argument so that makes him guilty because they hate guns (except for when their personal security has them).

The jury is going to have to decide at the time of the shooting did Killahouse have a legitimate self defense claim.
So many people with dumb takes on this case based off emotions and personal bias.

This is a retarded ass post, for all the reasons that have been mentioned.

Look up Clean Hands Doctrine. Why he was there and what he was doing there matters greatly

 

[ViShawn]

So many Gun owners are mentally unstable. “B...b...b... my rights “

The reason I ride for gun rights because most the women in my family live alone and own guns. I want them to carry more because they do dumb shyt like try and get food at 9PM at night in Atlanta.

With the violence going on there I just want them to feel safe. I've told some of them to go shooting when I'm in town.

I don't live there to protect them and my uncle and cousin live in Florida. My father has been deceased for a few years and wanted me to get her a gun due to his ailing health.

I could give a fukk about Rittenhouse. I want the laws to work for us and I don't want the government locking up someone I love for defending themselves because they "weren't supposed to be there" or any other excuse. Just me tho.

 

[1thouwow]

Why are we supposed to care about white on white crime again?

I’m still waiting on this answer

 

[Trust Me]

I’m still waiting on this answer

Because if they gonna let white on white slide... what do you think the next chapter of this book is gonna be?

 

[Trust Me]

Yes the judge is irrelevant the evidence is most important thing. The jury still has to make their decision based on the evidence they saw and heard. Not based on how the judge feels or wants.

When the judge was scolding the prosecutors the Jury was not present.

Defense is calling for a mistrial. Guess who gets to decide if its granted or not.

The 'irrelevant' judge.

 

[ViShawn]

Defense is calling for a mistrial. Guess who gets to decide if its granted or not.

The 'irrelevant' judge.

Gotta say that overall this thing is a spectacle

 

[mindgawn]

Bottom line if marked as pxssy but he proved otherwise...I'm with him. Don't try to take shyt by force cause you think you can...
Bust a mofo head if you ain't did shyt wrong and they think you pxssy and they can take yo cornbread, leave a mofo dead over weapons, life, family, and large sums of bread.

Respect is the key to all interactions.
Positive over negative.
Positive
Energy
Actives
Constant
Elevation

Bong Bong
Word to RZA

 

[1thouwow]

Because if they gonna let white on white slide... what do you think the next chapter of this book is gonna be?

Try harder

 

[saturn7]

@saturn7 if I go into a hood waving around guns, first of all I’m not getting the benefit of the doubt. If you are “protecting properties”, how do you end up killing two people that weren’t on that company property?

You can’t walk around with a gun looking for trouble. He didn’t protect any peace. He created more unrest. He should be buried under the jail.
If I went to Klan march and shot them up and said they were threatening me, what do you think they would do to me?

That's not how THIS particular case works. You may not like the fact that he had a gun on him. It is legal in that state to open carry long guns. Many other people were open carrying that night. Him open carrying doesn't make him guilty, him protecting or not protecting property does not make him guilty.

Nothing he did prior means he is guilty of the charges he is facing. The jury is not deciding this case based on the hypothetical situations you are making up. They have to decide if he was within his right to defend himself when he shot Rosenbaum, Huber and Grosskeutz. The state says he didn't have the right and instigated this incident. The defense says Rosenbaum was violent all night and made threats to Kyle earlier. We see the video of Kyle running from Rosenbaum until he pivots to shoot.

Did he have the right to shoot at that time? Does a reasonable person in that situation do the same thing if they think Rosenbaum is looking to harm them?

If you went to a klan rally and then shot at people and claimed self defense I can't say what would happen to you. Each case is different. You have to work with the facts of each case.

 

[saturn7]

Let me ask you a question and put it bluntly. Do you not think the judge has the ability to put pressure on jurors?

Edit: Its a rhetorical question. I've witnessed it with my own eyes and ears, after trials have been concluded.

No. How exactly?

You are giving this judge too much credit.