Billionaires are holding 8.5 Trillion dollars. The coli told me these businesses can't afford to pay employees a living wage.

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
76,734
Reputation
23,474
Daps
350,567


Somebody should show them this video!

It's easy! Bootstraps!

You don't need $175k if you have $5 a day!

shaquille-o-neal-shaq.gif
 
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
16,277
Reputation
2,250
Daps
53,027
Reppin
Continental U.S.
Richest person in the world 2017:

Richest people in the world 2023:
1
Increase
Bernard Arnault & family$211 billion
Increase
74
23px-Flag_of_France.svg.png
France
LVMH
2
Decrease
Elon Musk$180 billion
Decrease
51
23px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png
United States/
23px-Flag_of_South_Africa.svg.png
South Africa
Tesla, SpaceX

Richest person in the world didn't even break $100 billion a few years ago, now they're rapidly approaching $300 Billion.

Meanwhile:

"Enjoy your 5% raises shonny that's good money right derre."

Trickle down economics didn't work. Many engineers on subreddit will confirm that. One of the dumbest decisions ever. They don't even want to pay taxes that'd have no impact on their way of life in order to help out society.
By the way that's the motherfukkers whose wealth you can track. Who knows how much motherfukkers like the Saudi's royals or Putin has
 

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
19,688
Reputation
9,131
Daps
111,705
Perfect liquidation of 8.5 Trillion and then perfectly spread among 162M working people in the US= ~52,500 a person.

And then back to square 1 the next year.

I'll take the money, but the something's wrong with the system.
A socialist government would've liquidated that money and used it for reparations.

The money is there. The people that have it just don't want to pay the taxes that would make it happen and the people who have the power to make them are too invested(figuratively and literally) in those billionaires wellbeing to support a change in the status quo.

What would be pretty interesting to see is if something like 40% of the banks holding these billionaires wealth collapsed similar to 08, but then the average person who had money in the banks is made whole again whilst the multimillionaire and billionaires only get back 30%. The government buys a controlling interest in these banks(not outright nationalizing them but still able to veto risky decisions at shareholder meetings) and takes that money to pump it back into things like Healthcare, housing, social programs including reparations and child care as well as infrastructure.
 

Traveler

All Star
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
1,290
Reputation
136
Daps
4,583
A socialist government would've liquidated that money and used it for reparations.

The money is there. The people that have it just don't want to pay the taxes that would make it happen and the people who have the power to make them are too invested(figuratively and literally) in those billionaires wellbeing to support a change in the status quo.

What would be pretty interesting to see is if something like 40% of the banks holding these billionaires wealth collapsed similar to 08, but then the average person who had money in the banks is made whole again whilst the multimillionaire and billionaires only get back 30%. The government buys a controlling interest in these banks(not outright nationalizing them but still able to veto risky decisions at shareholder meetings) and takes that money to pump it back into things like Healthcare, housing, social programs including reparations and child care as well as infrastructure.
Y'all really have no clue of how money works. You think they have that money just sitting in banks? People with money don't have that much liquid wealth. It's tied up in assets. Unrealized gains. Value of property and business. It's not actually cash. Cash is the worst place to have your money cause it loses value. You need your money working for you to make more. So you going to force them to sell their shares lose control of companies and businesses. Force them to sell property, etc. that's where their wealth is sitting.
 

Ohene

Free Sheist
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
70,625
Reputation
5,810
Daps
119,873
Reppin
Toronto
That is absolutely ridiculous.

I'm sorry, but there are so many more positions at that company so much more critical and they most likely make a fraction of a fraction of that.

Get paid $22 mil a year knowing as long you don't take the Big Mac, Chicken McNuggets, Quarter Pounder, Filet-o-Fish, Happy Meals and fries off your menu you're banking.

A coli breh/brehette can probably get most of that job right. For $22 mil?!?!

Yeah, it's more complicated than that, but come on. It ain't rocket science (who make like $80k in some locations).
chill

i dont think you understand what a CEO does lol. i agree with everyone saying the wealth disparity is disgusting though
 

fact

Fukk you thought it was?
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
14,266
Reputation
5,977
Daps
57,722
Reppin
How you gonna ROFL with a hollow back?
Time to go upside the head on these rich mothafukkas. Since the pandemic they have been making a profit on the working class like we're dogs.
They should be dragged out of board rooms by raging mobs. We should have never let this happen, but then again, humans are goats at letting atrocities happen.
 

IIVI

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
9,332
Reputation
2,261
Daps
30,587
Reppin
Los Angeles
chill

i dont think you understand what a CEO does lol. i agree with everyone saying the wealth disparity is disgusting though
Yeah, that's why I mentioned that it's not that simple. However, this varies between companies. Some CEO's have it far far easier than others.

When it comes to McDonalds's case the product that has built their franchise for decades are still the main stars: Big Macs, Fries, Happy Meals, etc.
The simple rule here is you don't get rid of them. You don't change them. Easy. That's the 20% that does 90%+ of the work.

It's not like a company such as Apple/Google/Microsoft that must stay up to date with innovation. A CEO at these companies I think are far more valuable to what they do.
They got to make the big decisions about their main product, because unlike Big Mac's, you must make improvements to Microsoft Windows and people are either going to love or hate it and go to another platform - a potential customer you've lost for decades.
A tech CEO who happens to make stellar product decisions is going to be highly valuable to the company.
In comparison, McDonald's has had 4 CEO's the last 10 years, with no drop off because they already have the central products that have stood the test of time for decades.

Innovation for McDonald's is tracking new tech to save costs (like the automated restaurant in Texas(?)) and at this point outside of optimizing costs (which will mainly be your mathematicians/analysts working there anyways) to make the most amount of money, the other area that's vital is to expand your operation overseas. When it comes to product innovation, you don't really see it with them unless something else is a major mover like the new style of Chicken sandwiches, which they'll then make their own.

I'd arguably say that isn't worth that $22 mil/year (:mindblown:) and people there doing more of the heavy-lifting should probably be getting paid more.
 
Last edited:

The Half-Blood FKA Prince

Shroom gummies, liquor and destiny
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
4,698
Reputation
3,160
Daps
13,333
Anyone who believes the fact we out number these glutinous muhfukkas 99.99999 to 1 does not have anything and everything to do with them going out they way to fake pander to factions of society and rally us against EACH OTHER simply deserves to get bent over by these fakkits at this point :unimpressed:

If yall really feel a way and not ready to do what society has always inevitably done once they realized they were being collectively duped and exploited, maybe try not supporting these dikkheads? :skip:

Where do yall think they got every dime of this 8.5 trillion from in the first place? :snoop:
 

Paper Boi

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
71,325
Reputation
24,194
Daps
467,421
Reppin
NULL
You really don't know what farm work is like. Sitting in an office is 10000000x easier than agriculture work. Stop peddling insanity. You know what society existed before agriculture? Hunter/gatherer. Which was even harder lol

I guarantee if you had to grow your own food for survival you would quit.
I'm not going to fight with you over how labor intensive it is to work in agriculture other than to say there is a literal off season, there is no off season working as an employee as I have described in this thread.

you addressed none of my other points though, yes farming is hard work, i agree, but the farming you're thinking of in our society is also a product of capitalism.

growing food to feed yourself would not be the same thing we think of as gigantic agricultural operations today, once again, you my friend have capitalist brain rot. it's okay to admit, this country is meant to produce this mindset.
 
Top