really gotta find time to read all of this
we know they are black what we are saying is that they are not in any way connected to west africans. shyt how do you not fathom this concept
are cambodians ethnically connected to the vietnamese just because they are asian?
answer that question first, if you can't answer this question then you are not meant to be in this thread seeing as this is basis for the whole thread


Your denial of how we’ve arrived to this point is either a result of embarrassment or lack of critical thinking/understanding of inference.
Seems like you’re mostly offended at being called a cac. Your disposition doesn’t help your case.
I’ve been called one too and laughed it off while understanding the need for vetting.
Any accusation of us hijacking african history is pure cac projection and nothing else.
I’m arguing with a child, bro if you can’t understand something as simple as this there’s no Need to talk at this point. Stay upSo what did you disagree with then? I said that the Egyptians, moors, and Israelites could all be different variations of black and you said no. Now you’re saying that the Egyptians are black just a different variation than the black west Africans. Been on some duck duck goose shyt the whole time only to come reiterate the point I originally made....
You’ve been deflecting all thread and now want to make demands
My original point stands that the ancient Egyptians, Israelites and moors could all be different variations of black. You pretended to disagree only to end up acting as if this was your point all along
![]()
I’m arguing


Srsly? How could you misunderstand his post?I would like to say that Egypt is African history, but we as decendents of West Africans don't have much relation to them. Egypt is still a historical marvel
Are you talking about that "lioness" posterPlaces like Egyptsearch was originally full of Clyde Winter like scholars, but had been invaded by the coalition that I pointed, and now the website that was a haven for Afrocentric thought is now moderated by an open white supremacist pretending to be an “Afrocentric”
That sight still has old members with great info. Clyde Winters is a little out there, like Runoko Rashidi 
Are you talking about that "lioness" posterThat sight still has old members with great info. Clyde Winters is a little out there, like Runoko Rashidi
![]()
I ain't even have to say it. That shyt is bonkers bra! "Lioness" started out literally as a troll to the Black people there, and now that white boy is a fukking moderator on what was supposed to be an Afrocentric space. You can't make this shyt up.Low self esteem? I'm fully Nigerian and have ancestors who were citizens of one of the greatest empires in African history (Benin Empire). There's no evidence of large numbers of Egyptians moving to that area and DNA samples show that West Africans are a different haplogroup than Northeast Africans. Africans are the most genetically and culturally diverse people in the world.
You can admire Egypt but don't erase individual African identity to fulfill a wet dream.
A
Eeh that's not really true.Again this is a purely American concept. The only cacs who even give a shyt or claim shyt like are white Americans. I promise you a cac from Italy, France, Russia absolutely does not care in that fashion And will big up themselves first before anything. Ffs You can’t even have an Irishman, Englishmen, or Scott in the same building lest a fight break out
Eeh that's not really true.
The significance of Greek civilization for the French intellectual and political tradition explicitly & considerably permeates those spheres, and Ancient Greeks are justly considered as their pioneers.
[/URL]
And that’s who I am surrounded with, white cracker Americans. Thats who I debate with, you know what they say? They don’t try to say the Egyptians were black, they say they were anything other then black. Aliens even. Tribalism in Europe is different from tribalism in Africa for one they are United in whiteness regardless of their nationality or ethnicity. At the end of the day they see themselves as white with distinct history. Africans, from my understanding, see themselves as their tribe FIRST, religion, then black. Black Americans and Americans in general see race first, and Blacks see Egypt as a black African civlizatiion first regardless if it’s East African.
That’s what separates black Americans from black Africans, we try to keep Egypt black and don’t DENY the Egyptians their lineage thus we had to be the gatekeepers of black Egypt. Africans see their tribe and lineage first and see Egypt as secondary. Don’t try to input African methodology into black America.
The Egyptians went everywhere BUT the region closest to them
It's a mix of wanting to feel like that they are directly the heirs of ancient Egypt and modern day disdain for Horners
So much false info in here it’s ridiculous![]()
Mummy DNA unravels ancient Egyptians’ ancestry
Genetic analysis reveals a close relationship with Middle Easterners, not central Africans.
Excavations in the ancient city of Abusir el-Meleq. Credit: Petr Bonek/Alamy
The tombs of ancient Egypt have yielded golden collars and ivory bracelets, but another treasure — human DNA — has proved elusive. Now, scientists have captured sweeping genomic information from Egyptian mummies. It reveals that mummies were closely related to ancient Middle Easterners, hinting that northern Africans might have different genetic roots from people south of the Sahara desert.
The study, published on 30 May in Nature Communications1, includes data from 90 mummies buried between 1380 BC, during Egypt’s New Kingdom, and AD 425, in the Roman era. The findings show that the mummies’ closest kin were ancient farmers from a region that includes present-day Israel and Jordan. Modern Egyptians, by contrast, have inherited more of their DNA from central Africans.
Archaeological discoveries and historical documents suggest close ties between Egypt and the Middle East, but “it is very nice that this study has now provided empirical evidence for this at the genetic level”, says evolutionary anthropologist Omer Gokcumen of the State University of New York at Buffalo.
Egypt’s searing climate and the ancient practice of embalming bodies has made the recovery of intact genetic material daunting. The first DNA sequences thought to be from a mummy2 were probably the result of modern contamination, and many scientists are sceptical3 of purported genetic information acquired from the mummy of King Tutankhamun4.
The latest analysis succeeded by bypassing soft tissue — often abundant in Egyptian mummies — to seek DNA from bone and teeth. Researchers carefully screened the DNA to rule out contamination from anyone who had handled the mummies since their excavation a century ago in the ancient town of Abusir el-Meleq.
“More than half of the mummies we studied had pretty decent DNA preservation,” says co-author Johannes Krause, a palaeogeneticist at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, Germany.
The team “succeeds where previous studies on Egyptian mummies have failed or fallen short”, says Hannes Schroeder, a palaeogeneticist at the University of Copenhagen. Now, researchers can hope to answer questions such as whether immigration drove ancient-Egyptian population growth, adds Sonia Zakrzewski, a bioarchaeologist at the University of Southampton, UK.
The scientists obtained information about variations in mitochondrial DNA, which is passed from mother to child, from 90 mummies. Because of contamination, the team was able to acquire detailed nuclear DNA, which is inherited from both parents, from only three mummies.
Both types of genomic material showed that ancient Egyptians shared little DNA with modern sub-Saharan Africans. Instead, their closest relatives were people living during the Neolithic and Bronze ages in an area known as the Levant. Strikingly, the mummies were more closely related to ancient Europeans and Anatolians than to modern Egyptians.
The researchers say that there was probably a pulse of sub-Saharan African DNA into Egypt roughly 700 years ago. The mixing of ancient Egyptians and Africans from further south means that modern Egyptians can trace 8% more of their ancestry to sub-Saharan Africans than can the mummies from Abusir el-Meleq.
The new data can’t explain why the ancient Egyptians were so tightly aligned with people from the Middle East. Was it the result of migration, or were the Stone Age hunter-gatherers of northern Africa genetically similar to those of the Levant? It’s too early to tell, Krause says, but there’s a better chance now of getting answers. “This is the first glimpse of the genetic history of Egypt,” he says. “But it’s really just the start.”