Breaking News: Netflix beats Paramount & is buying Warner Brothers | Trump DOJ pledging Antitrust Enforcement

Will the deal go through?


  • Total voters
    23

Jaguar93

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2016
Messages
20,893
Reputation
6,254
Daps
98,852

David Ellison’s hunt for WBD made David Zaslav richer — and it may not be over​

  • Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison has made WBD CEO David Zaslav a lot richer with nothing to show for it as WBD agrees to sell its studio and streaming business to Netflix.
  • Paramount is now considering taking an offer straight to shareholders to acquire the asset, believing its deal has a better chance of gaining U.S. regulatory approval, sources told CNBC.
  • Paramount was the only bidder interested in acquiring all of WBD’s assets — the film studio, streaming service and TV networks. Netflix and Comcast were vying for just Warner Bros. and HBO Max.
 

Jazzy B.

Veteran
Joined
Aug 8, 2013
Messages
18,012
Reputation
3,295
Daps
65,838
But it's not true. People love being around random people. It's like saying concerts and festivals are out of date

Theaters are failing because the experience is too expensive and the available movies don't justify a trip to the movies. A great theater experience is still unmatched

Gen Z aint fukking with Theaters like that.

HALF of Millennials are being PRICED OUT due to COST OF LIVING and would rather spend their money on other shyt.

Aint no real reason to go to a theater unless it's an event film or you're taking your kids to watch a kids movie.

Everyone has a 4k TV now, everyone has bluetooth speakers, everyone can go to the local store and buy popcorn and drinks.

Paying a $100-$150 package per flick at the theater makes no sense going into 2026 :yeshrug:


Theaters will soon be an old head style exclusive club :manny:
 

daemonova

hit it, & I didn't go Erykah Badu crazy, #yallmad
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
52,997
Reputation
5,625
Daps
86,089
lol now y’all WB stans

name all these movies
Warner Bros. CEO David Zaslav says: "HBO Max will stay. So anybody that has Netflix and has HBO Max will have a better experience. For people that only want HBO Max, they'll be able to get it." "And Channing [Dungey] and the whole [Warner Bros.] TV production team will be producing content for others and for HBO and for Netflix. And I think for Netflix, they will now be the biggest maker of content with one of the greatest storytelling library in the world, together with their platform.

-variety
 

Cakebatter

All Star
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
3,039
Reputation
822
Daps
10,597
Paramount and Comcast both already own studios. Netflix getting WBD means fewer redundancies. I personally see Movie Theaters as a bad business model today, so Netflix isn't going to kill Theaters, Theaters are just zombies that don't know they are already dead. Netflix spent Chipotle money marketing K-Pop Demon Hunters for its streaming service. If they chose to put it in Theaters first, they would have had to spend a minimum of $50 Million in marketing to inform fans of the movie going to theaters. Then Netflix would be splitting the ticket revenue with the Theaters. So their aversion to theaters is financially legit. Studios are spending anywhere from $100 - $200 Million marketing each Blockbuster film. I love the theater experience, but Hollywood studios have little incentive today to keep a movie in theaters, now that they all have their own streaming services. Theaters make a bigger cut of the ticket revenue the longer a movie remains in theaters, but Studios have been making theater runs shorter and shorter. Man of Steel spent 13-14 weeks in theaters, while Superman 2025 spent 5-6 weeks in theaters, and went to Digital VOD in only 35 days. For reference Titanic stayed in theaters 43 weeks. Thus the shorter theater runs and the consumer anticipation that a movie will quickly come to streaming is what killed theaters.

The big movie studios and Netflix should collectively buy up Showcase Cinemas and AMC, then have their new theater company market the movies, rather than the individual studios. The studios would save a ton of money over the course of a year on marketing, and it provides incentive for studios to keep their films in theaters longer since they are keeping all the ticket revenue. Most of the studios aren't making a ton of streaming anyway.
 

EzekelRAGE

Veteran
Joined
Jul 22, 2015
Messages
18,086
Reputation
4,573
Daps
62,531
Netflix came in a like a thief in the night when almost everyone thought Paramount was the for sure winner :ehh:
Seems Netflix caught both Paramount and Comcast slippin. They were busy trying to negotiate details with WB while Netflix came in and said yes to speed past the others. When the board voted and wanted to sign a deal, Netflix was the only that had a contract that could be signed. That's because they didnt push back on much in the deal.
With the ink barely dried after Ellison closed an $8bn takeover of Paramount this summer, he set his sights on Warner and began making bids for it in September.

Zaslav bristled at the approaches, having already announced a plan to split apart WBD that would allow him to continue running the studio, streaming group and HBO — the more glamorous, faster-growing parts of the business — and spinning off legacy TV channels weighing on the share price.

But Warner's board realised it had to move quickly or risk losing control of events, said people briefed about the matter. WBD formally kicked off an auction in October as Zaslav sought out other buyers. "It became obvious [Paramount] weren't going to go away," said a person involved in the sale process.

To keep momentum for the auction, Warner imposed an extraordinarily compressed timetable, giving bidders days to revise terms that would typically take weeks.

"This was so big, it impacted so many people, we had to get on with it and not dilly dally," said a person close to Warner Bros' chief executive. During just six weeks, board directors were pulled into near-daily emergency meetings, all-night drafting sessions and a Thanksgiving-weekend of tough negotiations.

The auction came to a head this week, with final offers due on Monday morning. Netflix, Paramount and Comcast each submitted sharply different proposals. By Thursday night, after hours of debate, the board went into executive session and emerged with a unanimous verdict: accept Netflix's offer.

Netflix had not been the obvious frontrunner. The company had never attempted a deal of this magnitude. But inside the boardroom, one factor outweighed price: Netflix had presented a fully-formed offer.

"Netflix was ready to execute this deal in every material way," said a person involved in the sale negotiations. Its team spent 10 consecutive days addressing every request, tightening covenants and agreeing a $5.8bn break fee, among the largest on record.

The board wanted a proposal it could sign immediately. Netflix was the only bidder whose paperwork was fully executable that night. "Minutes after the vote, the contracts were signed," said one person involved. Netflix's offer met all of the Warner board's demands and it was willing to adopt requested changes to get the deal done. Paramount and Comcast, by contrast, were still seeking to negotiate certain terms, according to people familiar with the matter.

Zaslav could retain operational control of Warner even after Netflix takes over, although a formal agreement has not been signed
. This is a luxury he would not have been afforded under the Paramount deal, where he would have shared the chief executive role with Ellison.

Netflix said it expected the deal to close in 12 to 18 months. But people close to US regulators said the process could last longer as the transaction is expected to face serious antitrust hurdles. The combination of two of the largest streamers in the US was likely to be seen as anti-competitive, said a person close to Trump's regulatory officials.
 

O.Red

Veteran
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
20,213
Reputation
6,579
Daps
82,154
Reppin
NULL
Gen Z aint fukking with Theaters like that.

HALF of Millennials are being PRICED OUT due to COST OF LIVING and would rather spend their money on other shyt.

Aint no real reason to go to a theater unless it's an event film or you're taking your kids to watch a kids movie.

Everyone has a 4k TV now, everyone has bluetooth speakers, everyone can go to the local store and buy popcorn and drinks.

Paying a $100-$150 package per flick at the theater makes no sense going into 2026 :yeshrug:


Theaters will soon be an old head style exclusive club :manny:
Y'all never beating the reading comprehension allegations because how you gonna quote me saying 90% of what I said in the post you quoted:dahell:

Yes the theater experience has gotten too expensive

That don't erase the fact that people the theater experience, with a good movie and a full theater is unmatched and still loved. Netflix had a hit theater release this year. For some shyt that had been on Netflix for months. Care to tell me why that is?
 

Cloutius Maximus

with the aid of the Funk...
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
6,574
Reputation
2,531
Daps
29,044
Reppin
Altadena ---> Inglewood, California
Paramount and Comcast both already own studios. Netflix getting WBD means fewer redundancies. I personally see Movie Theaters as a bad business model today, so Netflix isn't going to kill Theaters, Theaters are just zombies that don't know they are already dead. Netflix spent Chipotle money marketing K-Pop Demon Hunters for its streaming service. If they chose to put it in Theaters first, they would have had to spend a minimum of $50 Million in marketing to inform fans of the movie going to theaters. Then Netflix would be splitting the ticket revenue with the Theaters. So their aversion to theaters is financially legit. Studios are spending anywhere from $100 - $200 Million marketing each Blockbuster film. I love the theater experience, but Hollywood studios have little incentive today to keep a movie in theaters, now that they all have their own streaming services. Theaters make a bigger cut of the ticket revenue the longer a movie remains in theaters, but Studios have been making theater runs shorter and shorter. Man of Steel spent 13-14 weeks in theaters, while Superman 2025 spent 5-6 weeks in theaters, and went to Digital VOD in only 35 days. For reference Titanic stayed in theaters 43 weeks. Thus the shorter theater runs and the consumer anticipation that a movie will quickly come to streaming is what killed theaters.

The big movie studios and Netflix should collectively buy up Showcase Cinemas and AMC, then have their new theater company market the movies, rather than the individual studios. The studios would save a ton of money over the course of a year on marketing, and it provides incentive for studios to keep their films in theaters longer since they are keeping all the ticket revenue. Most of the studios aren't making a ton of streaming anyway.
Theatrical runs still give films cultural legitimacy. Netflix films without theatrical runs are treated like disposable content. Netflix wants more of it's films in theaters because they understand this.
 

daemonova

hit it, & I didn't go Erykah Badu crazy, #yallmad
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
52,997
Reputation
5,625
Daps
86,089
Theatrical runs still give films cultural legitimacy. Netflix films without theatrical runs are treated like disposable content. Netflix wants more of it's films in theaters because they understand this.
G7dw4L8bQAAPDqK
 
Top