First off - again - no one cares except people invested in these other schools that solely exist to profit off unpaid labor. You know what happens when workers get a fair wage? Poorly run businesses die. Guess what - in sports some programs are bigger than others - it’s why you have multiple divisions in soccer. Manchester United has more bread than Norwich. Tough luck. A start can’t pay the same as Apple so people leave. This is the business world. Your complaints are based on a system that should’ve never existed and that was an anomaly in American society. Where else in American society are you clamoring for the regulation of worker’s salaries and spreading the wealth?Exactly. And its not with schools like Texas Tech per se (the main booster for Texas Tech's NIL fund just sold his oil company for $4 billion).
The point is all the other schools that dont have billionaire boosters. Every school cant do that. So even low level Big Ten or SEC or ACC schools, they cant match that. And with the mentality to be 'go where the money is' there is only so many spots at those schools. And once these kids dont produce championships, these boosters will stop donating.
Im not against these kids getting some money, but I am also not for the kids of today ruining the system so it will be done for kids 5, 10, 15 years down the road.
Second these schools have revenue sharing agreements if they are in any sort of conference so they’ll simply be sharing that revenue with players instead of pocketing it. It means that the football coach no longer gets to be the highest paid person in the state. NIL and revenue sharing are two different things and I don’t know why you’re conflating the two. Top schools have always been paying players and offering them benefits that smaller schools can’t. NIL allowed for that all to be brought up to the surface and suddenly the schools without bagmen were able to play the game legitimately. That’s all it is. There’s nothing stopping Texas Tech from sharing its conference revenue with its players. Whether it can compete from an NIL standpoint is a completely different conversation.
That’s like saying you need to regulate the connections a major talent agency has to marketing and branding companies and their ability to get you better deals than your local manager. Yeah that’s life. The only thing that needs to be regulated - through unions is the benefits players get and standardized contractual terms. I can empathize with the people annoyed about players being poached and I can agree that maybe making it so that freshman who sign must stay at least two years unless their coach leaves but upperclassmen should be free to move as they please. Most of these kids aren’t ever going to play professional ball and they deserve to maximize their income while they can.