the thread title is 'black 'leader... i don't think I would have answered the question of new 'white' leader...America needs an intellectual to lead, someone who puts education above dropping bombs. Obviously, I meant a leader in general, not a leader for black people
Too soft = too intellectual?
Too soft doesn't mean intellectual. we've had hard intellectuals... we've had intellectuals who wouldn't take pics with a school age white girl poses with fingers crossed looking like they're about to catch butterflies in a net later on..... That dude is softer than babyshyt... but could lead. The reason he couldn't is because 1)most people are ignorant as shyt and wouldn't catch everything he talks about. 2) black people are essentially at war and are targeted and bytchassness isn't right for the current situation.... the overall problem is classicism, and bytchassness isn't good for that battle either. 3)doesn't want to be some 'black' leader
Last edited: