Cacs will Cac, peep this Ebola :scheme:

[Kritic]

Heineken would beg to differ:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-...-revenue-surpasses-analysts-expectations.html



http://www.statista.com/statistics/188728/top-imported-beer-brands-in-the-united-states/







http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/09/us-heineken-nl-africa-idUSBREA480QG20140509



So Heineken finna invest double what they make in the US in Africa, and they aren't looked at as consumers?

alcohol should really be banned anywhere in the world and especially after. it doesn't really help their situation. they don't have the laws and education to be drinking like that.

israel allows drugs and alcohol in those countries they control over there around them so they can control them even further.

and we like women drinking cause you know why


anyway drugs and alcohol are not to be taken lightly. and if you're gonna drink at least drink your own shyt. why you gotta import that shyt and give bread to europeans over something so easy to make locally.

 

[blackzeus]

alcohol should really be banned anywhere in the world and especially after. it doesn't really help their situation. they don't have the laws and education to be drinking like that.

israel allows drugs and alcohol in those countries they control over there around them so they can control them even further.

and we like women drinking cause you know why


anyway drugs and alcohol are not to be taken lightly. and if you're gonna drink at least drink your own shyt. why you gotta import that shyt and give bread to europeans over something so easy to make locally.

It ain't just alcohol breh:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-...ca-s-massmart-holdings-for-21-08-a-share.html

Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the world’s largest retailer, plans to buy Massmart Holdings Ltd. in a transaction worth about $4.6 billion, entering Africa in its biggest deal in more than a decade.

Again, Walmart dumpin' $4.6 billy and they ain't looked at as consumers?

 

[theworldismine13]

You believe it occurred from a bat bite? Africa has been around for millenia and there has never been such a deadly outbreak on the continent, yet now all of a sudden a bat bite is droppin' people left and right? Are you REALLY that stupid?

lets be real, you dont know what the hell you are talking about, stop embarrassing yourself, fall back with the youtube science

 

[Kritic]

It ain't just alcohol breh:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-...ca-s-massmart-holdings-for-21-08-a-share.html



Again, Walmart dumpin' $4.6 billy and they ain't looked at as consumers?

if you want to look at it from economics you can see it that way. i'm looking at it from a political and social perspective.
walmart like any other company only cares about the bottomline and doesn't have respect for their employees so i doubt they give a fuq about consumers and especially in africa.

it's too bad africans don't have their shyt together to keep their shyt african and managed world class to escape neo colonialism.

 

[blackzeus]

lets be real, you dont know what the hell you are talking about, stop embarrassing yourself, fall back with the youtube science

Ebola was first detected by CAC scientists in 1976, ironically similar to the Marburg strain known in Germany. Coincidentally, ebola is also classified as a bioterroism agent, meaning it can be weaponized for biological warfare. So let's get this straight, a continent not known for epidemics mysteriously in the 1970s suddenly starts coming across ebola (and conincidentally AIDs around the same time). Now in 2010 the DoD (remember, ebola is also classified as a bioterrorism agent), invests $140 MILLION in Ebola research. Why would a military deparmentment invest as much in a disease as it would in R&D for fighter jets? Why would the DoD (a military department) invest so much money to prevent a disease that originated in the 70s in f*ckin' 2010? And why would there be an outbreak a few months after the Phase I clinical trials began in January? If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's not an eagle breh.

 

[AITheAnswerAI]

well, when you have a for-profit medical industry........................

And a patent on the ebola virus

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

And a patent on the ebola virus

I'm confused

http://www.google.com/patents/US20120251502


does this literally mean they hold the rights to the ebola virus, and not just these various methods for identification, treatment, etc?

either way, things that should not be for profit:

Healthcare/Medical treatment
Prisons
Education

 

[theworldismine13]

Ebola was first detected by CAC scientists in 1976, ironically similar to the Marburg strain known in Germany. Coincidentally, ebola is also classified as a bioterroism agent, meaning it can be weaponized for biological warfare. So let's get this straight, a continent not known for epidemics mysteriously in the 1970s suddenly starts coming across ebola (and conincidentally AIDs around the same time). Now in 2010 the DoD (remember, ebola is also classified as a bioterrorism agent), invests $140 MILLION in Ebola research. Why would a military deparmentment invest as much in a disease as it would in R&D for fighter jets? Why would the DoD (a military department) invest so much money to prevent a disease that originated in the 70s in f*ckin' 2010? And why would there be an outbreak a few months after the Phase I clinical trials began in January? If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's not an eagle breh.

this is just a corny conspiracy theory

 

[MostReal]

You believe it occurred from a bat bite? Africa has been around for millenia and there has never been such a deadly outbreak on the continent, yet now all of a sudden a bat bite is droppin' people left and right? Are you REALLY that stupid?

 

[blackzeus]

I'm confused

http://www.google.com/patents/US20120251502


does this literally mean they hold the rights to the ebola virus, and not just these various methods for identification, treatment, etc?

either way, things that should not be for profit:

Healthcare/Medical treatment
Prisons
Education

One day it will be legal to patent air, mark my words All jokes aside, I assume they patent the virus so they can patent the cure, e.g. you can claim the ebola your drug kills is a different type of ebola than what Teknamid provided a vaccine for. And yes, it's disgusting that saving lives can be funded by taxpayer dollars for a for-profit enterprise

 

[blackzeus]

this is just a corny conspiracy theory

I asked questions pertaining to facts I presented. The inference is obvious to anyone with a functioning cerebrum, nonetheless, I look forward to you answering them at your convenience Emperor

 

[OneManGang]

I'm confused

http://www.google.com/patents/US20120251502


does this literally mean they hold the rights to the ebola virus, and not just these various methods for identification, treatment, etc?

either way, things that should not be for profit:

Healthcare/Medical treatment
Prisons
Education

There is no patent on ebola, in the sense that it was man made. Please research for yourself and don't let Coli scientists mislead you. Any change to any microorganisms genome, no matter how minute and insignificant can result in a patent. It aids in research of the microbe.

Scientists do this all the time...there are probably thousands of patents on E. Coli alone.

 

[blackzeus]

There is no patent on ebola. Please research for yourself and don't let Coli scientists mislead you. Any change to any microorganisms genome, no matter how minute and insignificant can result in a patent. It aids in research of the microbe.

No, if they really wanted to aid the research, it would be open source type sh*t ala Linux. The patent helps because it protects the investors who have something to gain from funding the research. You patent all the potential strains of the virus, provide your vaccine/antiviral pill (ain't no more cures gon' be provided EVER ), and

 

[OneManGang]

No, if they really wanted to aid the research, it would be open source type sh*t ala Linux. The patent helps because it protects the investors who have something to gain from funding the research. You patent all the potential strains of the virus, provide your vaccine/antiviral pill (ain't no more cures gon' be provided EVER ), and

Don't you think if an altered strain was virulent and got out, they would be found out in this scheme you are concocting? They patented their crime...not logical
And investors are looking to make a return on their investment (research funding). If you create a drug, you don't want it to be given away for free. That's a very expensive process. On the other hand, there was no market for any ebola vaccine before this tragedy. So it's really not some coincidence that it's been developed in the wake of the outbreak as the need for it has skyrocketed. Less of a conspiracy and more just business to be honest.

Pharmaceutical companies don't even invest in antibiotics anymore because the market for them is low at the moment. Too many are already on the market.

This is not even unprecedented. Plagues happen, and will continue to happen everywhere on Earth. On the grand scale of things, this outbreak isn't even close to the worst viral outbreak the world has seen. Google Spanish Flu for a starter.

 

[Domingo Halliburton]

well if you want in on this "scheme" buy their stock:

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=TKMR