I don't know the answer (since it's ALL personal opinion), but I guess I will point out that the title says, "career-wise", for whatever that's worth...
To the point about....points vs. all-around game, is it truly out of the realm of possibility for this to be a debate when it seems that people, essentially, use parts of the same argument when discussing why Michael Jordan is unquestionably the greatest player of all time while seeming to undermine Kareem Abdul-Jabbar?
They both made a significant impact on the game and were a part of legendary dynasties in golden eras of the game. They both have the same number of championships. Kareem has more points than anyone that's ever played in the league (which includes Jordan, course), but Jordan is lauded for his mentality, approach to the game, and ability to make plays (offensively and defensively) when in clutch moments while winning championships.
If that's used to quantify a player like Jordan (over even Magic for that matter) over Kareem than where's the harm in one using it for this debate?
Manu from Argentina so in his country they living the same
