Christians create the annoying atheists that they hate so much.

[tmonster]

Using the sun rising and comparing the results you would see a pattern that would be repeated every month or so with various mood swings approximately a week or so before menstruation. When enough data is collected you could make an argument for the cause being hormones since your daily reporting would eliminate social and environmental options. It would have to be narrowed to biological in which hormones reside.

so what if your hypothetical results are null?

 

[tmonster]

I don't mean the deity but the school of thought.

it's most likely deism, the last bastion of theists who are willing to or accidentally happen to think

 

[Jesus Shuttlesworth]

I don't mean the deity but the school of thought.

I'm just trying to live right in a world that's dead wrong.

 

[Thsnnor]

so what if your hypothetical results are null?

They will fall during peer review. Either other scientists will come to the same conclusion or none of them will.

 

[tmonster]

They will fall during peer review. Either other scientists will come to the same conclusion or none of them will.

and after that what is the hypothetical results are found to be null?

 

[semtex]

I'm just trying to live right in a world that's dead wrong.

So you're just making shyt up and being like "disprove it"

I see

 

[Thsnnor]

and after that what is the hypothetical results are found to be null?

By that point after the peer review I can see what others said and adjust. Maybe the moon is needed or seasons or even more than one woman.

 

[Futuristic Eskimo]

Came back to the thead, @Napoleon has explained it several times already, and dudes still don't know what gnosticism and theism mean

You gentleman are wasting your time. It is surprisingly difficult to convince an idiot of his own ignorance.

 

[tmonster]

By that point after the peer review I can see what others said and adjust. Maybe the moon is needed or seasons or even more than one woman.

so back to the original question: given that your results are null, can the fact that the sun rise every morning be used to help me believe that female menstruation is driven by hormones?

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

I have already showed why you are wrong.

Atheism is not a belief that there is no god. Its the lack of belief in a god.

Atheism is the same as the not-guilty charge. It does not mean you're innocent. Merely that there is not enough evidence to be guilty.

So via common sense, you can't have a definitive stance that "God does not exist" all you can state is that there is a extremely high probability that there is no GOD. Since there is no evidence supporting the existence or non existence of some type of deity.....

 

[Thsnnor]

so back to the original question: given that your results are null, can the fact that the sun rise every morning be used to help me believe that female menstruation is driven by hormones?

Yes. A failed peer review will always say why it failed. Using that info and making changes you question can be answered.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I don't need to prove anything because you already know this. I'm using it as an example to show how weak your "argument" is.

Ultimately, this is still YOUR claim, not mine.

So please, prove I was wrong way back when you said it. And now prove your next claim that gravity disproves God.

Modern understanding of gravity disproves gravity being attributed to "god"

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

So via common sense, you can't have a definitive stance that "God does not exist" all you can state is that there is a extremely high probability that there is no GOD. Since there is no evidence supporting the existence or non existence of some type of deity.....

This is all i've been saying.

I've never said: "There is no god"

I'm saying that there is not enough evidence for me to accept that claim.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

But he didn't. Any theory goes through peer review. You know this. It will either fall or stand on its own claim.

Precisely, so why the fukk does it matter WHO the info comes from???????????/

 

[tmonster]

Yes. A failed peer review will always say why it failed. Using that info and making changes you question can be answered.

that makes no sense, you may need better water