Confession

[RhodyRum]

Brehs...lately I've been issues with my sexuality and arousal levels with women. I find them attractive and I enjoy porn and adult entertainment and all that.



But I cannot be sexual with a woman unless I have emotional attachment, bonding, and simply know that I am in a safe space with them.



With that said I finally decided to come out and tell you guys and my fellow Nastettes:



@™BlackPearl The Empress™ @Gloxina @HarlemHottie @Kasgoinjail



I'm A Demisexual




















Still Nasty Tho

 

[King_Kamala61]

But you don't "recognize" beauty. You sexualize women constantly.

Wanting to like someone before you have sex with them is not uncommon or rare. Many people feel that way.

I think the disconnect here is that you’re equating sexual expression with sexual motivation. They’re not the same thing. I can speak openly or even graphically about attraction without that meaning I want to sleep with someone or feel sexually driven toward them in real life. Expression doesn't equal intent.

Also, “wanting to like someone before sex” isn’t what I’m describing. That’s a common preference. What I’m describing is that sexual desire itself doesn’t activate for me without emotional intimacy. Until that bond forms, there’s no real pull to pursue or act, regardless of how attractive someone is.

So yes, I can notice beauty and even talk about it. But for me, attraction that actually moves me toward someone is conditional on connection, not visuals alone. That distinction is the whole point, and it’s an internal experience you don’t really get to override based on observation.

You don’t have to agree with the label, but dismissing how someone experiences desire because it looks familiar from the outside doesn’t make it less real.

 

[King_Kamala61]

Today At 6

Motel Inn...20 After 10

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

I think the disconnect here is that you’re equating sexual expression with sexual motivation. They’re not the same thing. I can speak openly or even graphically about attraction without that meaning I want to sleep with someone or feel sexually driven toward them in real life. Expression doesn't equal intent.

Also, “wanting to like someone before sex” isn’t what I’m describing. That’s a common preference. What I’m describing is that sexual desire itself doesn’t activate for me without emotional intimacy. Until that bond forms, there’s no real pull to pursue or act, regardless of how attractive someone is.

So yes, I can notice beauty and even talk about it. But for me, attraction that actually moves me toward someone is conditional on connection, not visuals alone. That distinction is the whole point, and it’s an internal experience you don’t really get to override based on observation.

You don’t have to agree with the label, but dismissing how someone experiences desire because it looks familiar from the outside doesn’t make it less real.

You want to be a special snowflake so bad. There is nothing uncommon with what you're describing.

Also appreciating beauty is not acting like a pervert and talking about how much you engage in prostitution.

The real question is why do you need a sex therapist in the first place?

 

[King_Kamala61]

You want to be a special snowflake so bad. There is nothing uncommon with what you're describing.

Also appreciating beauty is not acting like a pervert and talking about how much you engage in prostitution.

The real question is why do you need a sex therapist in the first place?

I’m not trying to be special. I’m also not asking you to validate a label. I’m describing how my attraction actually works. Whether it’s common or uncommon isn’t the point; the accuracy is.

You are also collapsing a lot of unrelated things into one argument. Being open or explicit about sex doesn’t mean I lack discernment or boundaries in real life. Especially when no woman poster on this board has been on the receiving end of me trying to date them. That's a fact chère.

Again....talking about sex, even joking about it, isn’t the same as being driven by it or acting on it indiscriminately. Expression and behavior aren’t interchangeable.

As for therapy: people work with therapists for clarity, not because something is “wrong.” That question feels less about curiosity and more about discrediting, and that conversation is something I'm not interested in moving towards that direction of conversation respectfully.

We clearly see this differently, and that’s fine and great. But I’m not going to keep explaining my internal experience to anyone who’s already decided it can’t exist. That's not fair to me and fair to our platonic relationship/friendship. I feel attacked.
I’m not trying to be special, and I’m not asking you to validate a label. I’m describing how my attraction actually works. Whether it’s common or uncommon isn’t the point; accuracy is.
You’re also collapsing a lot of unrelated things into one argument. Being open or explicit about sex doesn’t mean I lack discernment or boundaries in real life. Talking about sex, even joking about it, isn’t the same as being driven by it or acting on it indiscriminately. Expression and behavior aren’t interchangeable.
As for therapy: people work with therapists for clarity, not because something is “wrong.” That question feels less about curiosity and more about discrediting, and I’m not interested in that direction of conversation.
We clearly see this differently, and that’s fine. But I’m not going to keep explaining my internal experience to someone who’s already decided it can’t exist. I feel attacked

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

I’m not trying to be special. I’m also not asking you to validate a label. I’m describing how my attraction actually works. Whether it’s common or uncommon isn’t the point; the accuracy is.

You are also collapsing a lot of unrelated things into one argument. Being open or explicit about sex doesn’t mean I lack discernment or boundaries in real life. Especially when no woman poster on this board has been on the receiving end of me trying to date them. That's a fact chère.

Again....talking about sex, even joking about it, isn’t the same as being driven by it or acting on it indiscriminately. Expression and behavior aren’t interchangeable.

As for therapy: people work with therapists for clarity, not because something is “wrong.” That question feels less about curiosity and more about discrediting, and that conversation is something I'm not interested in moving towards that direction of conversation respectfully.

We clearly see this differently, and that’s fine and great. But I’m not going to keep explaining my internal experience to anyone who’s already decided it can’t exist. That's not fair to me and fair to our platonic relationship/friendship. I feel attacked.
I’m not trying to be special, and I’m not asking you to validate a label. I’m describing how my attraction actually works. Whether it’s common or uncommon isn’t the point; accuracy is.
You’re also collapsing a lot of unrelated things into one argument. Being open or explicit about sex doesn’t mean I lack discernment or boundaries in real life. Talking about sex, even joking about it, isn’t the same as being driven by it or acting on it indiscriminately. Expression and behavior aren’t interchangeable.
As for therapy: people work with therapists for clarity, not because something is “wrong.” That question feels less about curiosity and more about discrediting, and I’m not interested in that direction of conversation.
We clearly see this differently, and that’s fine. But I’m not going to keep explaining my internal experience to someone who’s already decided it can’t exist. I feel attacked

You go beyond sexual interest to outright inappropriate though which you seem to be glossing over and excusing.

I'm telling you that your inward experience is not what you present to the outside world.

Seems like you're only interested in comforting language that label you as a deep reflecting individual. However you present as someone overly freaked out.

Maybe you should present in a different way if you expect people to believe you...or not. But actions do speak louder than words.

But you're not interested in honesty. So I'll leave it there. Best of luck in therapy.

 

[Unbothered]

Dayum, a Coli Bruh afraid of the P .

Say it ain't so, goddayum, what's the world coming to these days ?

Spoiler

 

[King_Kamala61]

You go beyond sexual interest to outright inappropriate though which you seem to be glossing over and excusing.

I'm telling you that your inward experience is not what you present to the outside world.

Seems like you're only interested in comforting language that label you as a deep reflecting individual. However you present as someone overly freaked out.

Maybe you should present in a different way if you expect people to believe you...or not. But actions do speak louder than words.

But you're not interested in honesty. So I'll leave it there. Best of luck in therapy.

I’m not denying that how I present can be interpreted differently than how I experience things internally. That’s a fair observation, and I’ve acknowledged that perception and internal reality don’t always align. Where we differ is that you’re treating that gap as proof of dishonesty rather than difference.

Being explicit, irreverent, or even provocative in how I talk about sex doesn’t negate the way attraction actually forms for me. Presentation is a choice and sometimes a filter; desire it is not. You’re evaluating my internal experience solely through external expression, and I don’t think that’s a reliable way to assess someone’s psychology. Plus it's also unfair to do that to your platonic friend and platonic friendship.

I’m not asking for comforting language or a flattering label; that's projection. I’m merely explaining my own patterns, while not asking you to approve of them. Don't get me wrong you are most definitely free to dislike how I come across, but that doesn’t invalidate how I experience attraction.

At this point, I think we’re talking past each other. And I value our friendship a lot. I truly appreciate the honesty about how I’m perceived, but I’m not interested in having my motives or self-awareness dismissed. That's dismissal of my human experience and it invalidates my existence. Also my therapist told me to tell you hello and she thinks you are hilarious as well.

 

[King_Kamala61]

Dayum, a Coli Bruh afraid of the P .

Say it ain't so, goddayum, what's the world coming to these days ?

Spoiler

Handjobs And Handjob Accessories Only

 

[boogers]

i dont wanna sound like an a$$hole, but i cant really been seen in threads like OPs anymore

OP gonna be tongue kissing @Pazzy on the mouth in 3 months. im out

 

[King_Kamala61]

i dont wanna sound like an a$$hole, but i cant really been seen in threads like OPs anymore

OP gonna be tongue kissing @Pazzy on the mouth in 3 months. im out

stop speaking your sexual fantasies into existence sir.







@Pazzy Wassup breh


You Coming To The Nasty Brehz Event?


Stoke-A-Mania 2026


Itz An All Night Ride

 

[987654321]

You go beyond sexual interest to outright inappropriate though which you seem to be glossing over and excusing.

The legal definition of “Appropriate” is relative to the audience occupying the sub-forum, and thread, in which a @King_Kamala61 comment may exist.

 

[King_Kamala61]

The legal definition of “Appropriate” is relative to the audience occupying the sub-forum, and thread, in which a @King_Kamala61 comment may exist.

Nothing I say is inappropriate......







Itz Nasty...Nasty AF

 

[987654321]

stop speaking your sexual fantasies into existence sir.







@Pazzy Wassup breh


You Coming To The Nasty Brehz Event?


Stoke-A-Mania 2026


Itz An All Night Ride

You go beyond sexual interest to outright inappropriate though which you seem to be glossing over and excusing.

I stand corrected.