Democratic Party Rebuild

[Outlaw]

Obsessed? Ezra is one of the most respected consultants by the establishment whose peddling bullshyt. He should be called out, our party respects him.

I’ve stopped watching majority report because they’re too online left pilled now but when I was watching he kept throwing petty pot shots at Ezra and “abundance”.

 

[MAKAVELI25]

I’ve stopped watching majority report because they’re too online left pilled now but when I was watching he kept throwing petty pot shots at Ezra and “abundance”.

Yeah, Sam has a habit of doing that. Also throws shots at the "Pod" bros. I don't think it is personal resentment though, that's more of the vibe that I get from Cenk.

If Emma ends up taking over, I think one thing she would do better than him is build communities with other podcast hosts, she actually co-hosted an episode of "Pod Save" a few months back. She has the potential to make the show even bigger than it is now, and she is more consistently focusing on marketing/sales than Sam (she is often the one to remind the audience what is on sale in the store).

 

[wire28]

Because yall keep spamming him like everyone should give a fukk about a NYC mayor.

This the same she we laughed at Nap about when he was running the same game with Eric Adams

Right lol he ain’t gonna help nikkas in detroit (shoutout Mary Sheffield I’m rooting for you) or anywhere else. This is just an example of NYC thinking they run shyt like it’s the 90s and having to be the center of attention for everything

 

[wire28]

I’ve stopped watching majority report because they’re too online left pilled now but when I was watching he kept throwing petty pot shots at Ezra and “abundance”.

Van Lathan just dropped a new higher learning episode where he goes in on our white allies that @John Reena might like towards the end specifically progressive hero graham platner and his curious relationship with minorities 2 hr 13 min 30 sec I ain’t time stamping im on my phone sorry



Edit: and the segment directly after that is

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

They were until it was stopped. Even more were getting hormone treatments.

This is a foundational issue.

Newsom even broke rank on the sports issue. It’s that serious.

WRONG. And Newsom is a weak-willed turd who said people need to continue Charlie Kirk's work of spreading white christian supremacy. fukk him.

fewer than 1 out of every 1,000 insured adolescents even received puberty blockers or hormones. Surgeries for minors are essentially nonexistent under age 12, and extremely rare overall (e.g., 2.1 per 100,000 for ages 15-17 in 2019).

This is not a picture of mass treatment. It is one of a manufactured panic. They are taking an extremely small subset of [emergency] care and treating it like it's broad.

Fewer than 0.1 percent of U.S. adolescents receive gender-affirming medications, report finds

From 2018 through 2022, only 926 adolescents with a gender-related diagnosis received puberty blockers and 1,927 received hormones, suggesting that fewer than 0.1 percent of all youth in the database received these medications.

www.pbs.org

Gender-affirming care is rare, study says— Harvard Gazette

Fewer than 1 in 1,000 transgender youth receive hormones or puberty blockers.

news.harvard.edu

Prevalence of Gender-Affirming Surgical Procedures Among Minors and Adults in the US

This cross-sectional study uses a national dataset to examine the prevalence of gender-affirming surgical procedures among minors and adults in the US.

jamanetwork.com

Prevalence of Gender-Affirming Surgical Procedures Among Minors and Adults in the US - PMC

This cross-sectional study uses a national dataset to examine the prevalence of gender-affirming surgical procedures among minors and adults in the US.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

WRONG.



This is not a picture of mass treatment. It is one of a manufactured panic. They are taking an extremely small subset of [emergency] care and treating it like it's broad.

Fewer than 0.1 percent of U.S. adolescents receive gender-affirming medications, report finds

From 2018 through 2022, only 926 adolescents with a gender-related diagnosis received puberty blockers and 1,927 received hormones, suggesting that fewer than 0.1 percent of all youth in the database received these medications.

www.pbs.org

Gender-affirming care is rare, study says— Harvard Gazette

Fewer than 1 in 1,000 transgender youth receive hormones or puberty blockers.

news.harvard.edu

Prevalence of Gender-Affirming Surgical Procedures Among Minors and Adults in the US

This cross-sectional study uses a national dataset to examine the prevalence of gender-affirming surgical procedures among minors and adults in the US.

jamanetwork.com

Prevalence of Gender-Affirming Surgical Procedures Among Minors and Adults in the US - PMC

This cross-sectional study uses a national dataset to examine the prevalence of gender-affirming surgical procedures among minors and adults in the US.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

You said it wasn’t happening. Now its rare.

This has to be the first medical condition that people dont want to treat.

Weird...

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

@Pull Up the Roots This is the problem. You’ve got this case going viral of this black lesbian (and a great singer btw) who kicked out this man in a woman's locker room. She also voted for Kamala and lives in LA.

Now she’s anti-trans. You created another republican today.

You seem to not grasp how radicalizing this issue is for normal people.

 

[Reality Check]

Don’t remind me of kunce. He was supposed to be the chosen one
@Reality Check

2022 should have been his year

Instead, we got a bland white woman who bought the nomination because of her last name.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

You said it wasn’t happening. Now its rare.

This has to be the first medical condition that people dont want to treat.

Weird...

There's no contradiction here. What I said "isn't happening" is the fantasy you keep pushing that kids are being "mutilated" in large numbers. That's not reality. It's moral panic nonsense. Your entire argument falls apart without that exaggeration. You're taking a statistically tiny number of cases -- cases that already require multiple medical evaluations, parental consent, and careful psychological evaluations -- and pretending it's some runaway epidemic, when it isn't. You don't get to invent a crisis out of a narrow clinical reality that's tightly regulated by doctors, parents, and professional standards to satisfy your personal hang-up.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

There's no contradiction here. What I said "isn't happening" is the fantasy you keep pushing that kids are being "mutilated" in large numbers. That's not reality. It's moral panic nonsense. Your entire argument falls apart without that exaggeration. You're taking a statistically tiny number of cases -- cases that already require multiple medical evaluations, parental consent, and careful psychological evaluations -- and pretending it's some runaway epidemic, when it isn't. You don't get to invent a crisis out of a narrow clinical reality that's tightly regulated by doctors, parents, and professional standards to satisfy your personal hang-up.

What is better? Stage 1 cancer or Stage 4 cancer?

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

.

I like how on one-hand it's: "Stop the identity politics!!" then on the other, it: " Let's exploit someone's identity -- Black lesbian -- so I can weaponize it against a group of people I hate!"

If her claims are true, then the individual involved should face consequences. Period. But we should not base laws or policies on unverified stories amplified by viral social media drama.

We should always strive to protect people from real harm. That is essential to a civil society. But using anecdote-driven panic to justify sweeping discrimination? That's just prejudice dressed up as politics. And

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

What is better? Stage 1 cancer or Stage 4 cancer?

That's a misleading analogy. We're not debating whether any treatment exists or not, we're debating whether a tiny, carefully regulated medical practice equals mass "mutilation" or a sweeping crisis.

Stage 1 cancer is treatable and rare. Stage 4 cancer is serious and widespread.

Gender-affirming care for minors is more like targeted, cautious, and rare intervention, not an epidemic.

Using cancer stages to justify panic over a medical approach supported by decades of research and expert guidelines is fearmongering, not a serious argument.

It's in the realm of asking: "Why can't we stand on the sun at night?"

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

That's a misleading analogy. We're not debating whether any treatment exists or not, we're debating whether a tiny, carefully regulated medical practice equals mass "mutilation" or a sweeping crisis.

Stage 1 cancer is treatable and rare. Stage 4 cancer is serious and widespread.

Gender-affirming care for minors is more like targeted, cautious, and rare intervention, not an epidemic.

Using cancer stages to justify panic over a medical approach supported by decades of research and expert guidelines is fearmongering, not a serious argument.

It's in the realm of asking: "Why can't we stand on the sun at night?"

When would you rather catch cancer? Stage 1 or Stage 4?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

We should always strive to protect people from real harm. That is essential to a civil society. But using anecdote-driven panic to justify sweeping discrimination? That's just prejudice dressed up as politics. And

Are you harming people by coddling mental illness?

 

[MAKAVELI25]

Are you harming people by coddling mental illness?

I think if you had the requisite amount of self awareness, you would realize that your own obsession with this topic is tantamount to mental illness. I would bet a month's salary that your posts constitute at least 50% of the posts in the trans thread. That's not normal behavior at all.