- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Messages
- 31,751
- Reputation
- 19,278
- Daps
- 120,176
- Reppin
- SOHH Icey HawkSet ByrdGang
may Jesus lead yall to Islam
I believe this is based on the fact that all the accounts rest on Paul who apparently never even met Jesus AND the first accounts are dated to 70+ years after the events supposedly happened.Yeah, I looked into this heavy like 10+ years ago. Jesus never existed. Something about his name wasn't even mentioned until like 200 years after his death or something. I don't really remember what I found, but it convinced me that he never existed
Did the historical Jesus exist? A growing number of scholars don’t think so
what about the muslims who want you to believe he wasnt the son of godAll the posters that either have lisps, look like homosexuals, are indian, are gay will want to believe christ isn't real.
That isnt a very loud voice on thecoli. Not even a whisper. No muslims argue with Christians on the coli.what about the muslims who want you to believe he wasnt the son of god![]()
I believe this is based on the fact that all the accounts rest on Paul who apparently never even met Jesus AND the first accounts are dated to 70+ years after the events supposedly happened.
And the josephus testimony is flawed too.
We know Josephus is based entirely on hearsay. ENTIRELY.Josephus yelled at a friend because he gave his opinion. Better yet if Josephus writings exist then the article is false because we do have writings from the common era.
We know Josephus is based entirely on hearsay. ENTIRELY.
Thats not good enough.
Even if someone named "Jesus" did exist, this says nothing about his supernatural "abilities" nor does it move him higher than cult leader status.
We know Josephus is based entirely on hearsay. ENTIRELY.
Thats not good enough.
Even if someone named "Jesus" did exist, this says nothing about his supernatural "abilities" nor does it move him higher than cult leader status.
http://exchristian.net/3/the N.T. Is the most accurate historically set of documents we have.