Did the historical Jesus exist? A growing number of scholars don’t think so

TooLazyToMakeUp1

LWO suicide bomber
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2012
Messages
24,879
Reputation
8,770
Daps
96,452
Reppin
Out here in my damn drawls


Busted out laughing and got people in the airport like :dahell:

The sad thing is that religious people can't see that they actually look like this. Talk about the end of days, but only become devout when they get scared. The lady in there that was a high school mental health specialist :snoop:
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,469
Daps
246,399
Yes, attempts at rationalizing the universe from people who didn't understand how it works.

Understanding the motives of man > rationalizing the universe (which will never be done)
 

Nino Brown

All Star
Joined
Nov 13, 2013
Messages
2,361
Reputation
500
Daps
4,839
Reppin
NYC/LDN
All I really 'know' is what happened in the last 27 years of my life

The books tell me that Jesus is an idea that existed for thousands of years at least, and not a real person, to help let people know how to act

The major books of monotheism are written as a puzzle that purposely can't be solved.
 

Thatrogueassdiaz

We're on the blood path now
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
29,211
Reputation
4,378
Daps
51,827
Reppin
Center self, inner self
So what's this article really saying? That there was never a Jesus at all? Or that there was a historical Jesus who later became mythologized into the Jesus of the Bible?
The latter.
The former.

The latter view of the historical Jesus who became mythologized is agreed upon by the vast majority of non-theists. Fitzgerald goes a step further and says there was no Jesus at all.
Article seemed to lean toward the latter
I always believed he existed. I just didn't believe he was the super savior that Christians made him out to be. :ehh:

I dont think anyone knew who Jesus was. shyt if u read the gospels it's very clear that Jesus didn't like the ppl who were around him

Right.

I'll grant people that there were some charismatic and engaging "leaders" at the time, but all the supernatural shyt didn't happen (we know this and I hope we don't have to explain why/how) and he definitely wasn't who he said he was.

We've had bigger and more powerful leaders come along in the world who deified themselves like Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, etc. to a level where they were themselves religious entities in the way they were revered so limiting the definition of "religion" to the Big Three is simply disingenuous.
It wasn't him who said he was anything. It was those around him and those who came after him

All the posters that either have lisps, look like homosexuals, are indian, are gay will want to believe christ isn't real.

The N.T. Is 99.5% historically accurate. The 0.5% are mistakes are things like you vs your.

By the way are you now against prayers and vitamins because you don't have on the red and yellow? What will the Hulkamaniacs think?

THEY CAN STICK IT, BROTHER!
 

Thsnnor

Believer in Jesus
Supporter
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
2,429
Reputation
557
Daps
2,894
Reppin
Jesus
MIracles didn't happen. Just get that through your head. Stop thinking magically. It makes you an insipid child.

Furthermore, EVERY critic dismisses Josephus not because of the conditions he wrote his "testimony" under but because not only did he never meet this guy, everything he wrote is hearsay. All of it.

Do you really think a 2000 year old man with no understanding of how the world works WOULDNT be misled about some fantasy shyt happening?

Don't be fukking stupid.

Do yourself a favor and look up what the inscription says on Larazus tomb says. The evidence exists and it is archeological and historical. Opinions will not change the fact they exist today.
 

Thsnnor

Believer in Jesus
Supporter
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
2,429
Reputation
557
Daps
2,894
Reppin
Jesus
Theres no books written before then. Stop lying

I will admit the easiest part of talking with you is it will not change the facts. Did you know the book of Job is one of the earliest accounts stating the earth is a sphere floating on nothing? Did you know Paul correctly described the currents in the region during his travels while other scholars got it wrong for hundreds of years afterwards? Did you know we know and have more documentation for Jesus than Aristotle, two different Caesars and Plato?

Don't stick with what the discovery channel says. They have been caught lying many times.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
324,559
Reputation
-34,149
Daps
632,127
Reppin
The Deep State
I will admit the easiest part of talking with you is it will not change the facts. Did you know the book of Job is one of the earliest accounts stating the earth is a sphere floating on nothing?
Thats not scientifically demonstrated.

False.

Did you know Paul correctly described the currents in the region during his travels while other scholars got it wrong for hundreds of years afterwards?
Determining trade winds doesn't mean his cult leader was the son of god

Did you know we know and have more documentation for Jesus than Aristotle, two different Caesars and Plato?
And this doesn't mean he "cured the sick"

Don't stick with what the discovery channel says. They have been caught lying many times.]
And you're too stupid to tell the difference.
 

Thsnnor

Believer in Jesus
Supporter
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
2,429
Reputation
557
Daps
2,894
Reppin
Jesus
Determining trade winds doesn't mean his cult leader was the son of god
And this doesn't mean he "cured the sick"

And it was for these two reasons why he was put to death. Even they were smart enough to know that Satan can not cast out Satan.

Remember, if Jesus body was found we would not be discussing this today. His body was not found and we even have records of him being seen
in the 40 days afterwards.
 
Top