He cut and pasted his own shyt, though. This dude holds the world record for most publications ever. Like the dude could produce some shyt.
He was invariably a genius. You don't have to like him or support what he did with it, but he is a fasicinating human being.
And if we acknowledge that he was indeed psychotic, meaning having consistent fixed false delusions, then perhaps we can view his belief system under a different moral lens in this light.
Have you watched the movie, "The Master"?
Phillip Seymour Hoffman basically plays an upstart Hubbard. You'd probably like it.
The main thing I took away from this is that all religions that propagate to some extent have very clever conventions, and via those conventions followers of those religions can't always discern how absurd some beliefs are. I also think the dynamic surrounding Scientology is interesting because it's a religion fostered in modernity.
		


Like I have considered every rational possibilty as to how improbable it is yet I'm still 
Or giving some fukknikka preacher my hard earned bread because his bytchass said Jesus said so 
But if it socially required for me to acknowledge Jesus for political/corporate/job/work/my own personal benefit then Im praising Jeeeeeessssuuussssssss waaaallkkssss 

		
 so i doubt the going at them with the force of say the Panthers or a Sihk Temple...


