Dirk passes Garnett on all-time scoring list (14th)

AlldayNE

Pro
Joined
Feb 5, 2013
Messages
1,250
Reputation
-50
Daps
865
Reppin
NULL
Those mavs of the mid 2000's had more talent but were terrible on defense[which yes i know was Dirks wekaness also] I personally wold take Dirk because in the nba playoffs the most important thing is having a go to superstar you need a guy who can be #1 option on a title team and go apeshyt offensively and score on anyone theyres not many players in the league now or in the history of the league that could do that Dirk was one of em so his skillset was more valauble imo

It also depedns on the team,if i had a team with guys who could carry the offensive load like the Celtics did where KG didnt have to be the go to guy KG is a better fit if i had a team like the 2001 Mavs that needed a guy to carry the load offneisvely every night im taking Dirk by far i think thats fair no?

01 team had Nash and Finley, put a KG that averages 21/12/1/2(He turned it up to 24/19 in the playoffs) on a team with Finley averaging 20, and Nash averaging 18/7. Keep in mind Dirk only averaged 23 that year. You telling me you wouldn't take the hit offensively for a major defensive upgrade?
 

ManBearPig

half man half bearpig
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
27,406
Reputation
-2,850
Daps
29,837
Reppin
Chi-town
01 team had Nash and Finley, put a KG that averages 21/12/1/2(He turned it up to 24/19 in the playoffs) on a team with Finley averaging 20, and Nash averaging 18/7. Keep in mind Dirk only averaged 23 that year. You telling me you wouldn't take the hit offensively for a major defensive upgrade?
 
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
8,296
Reputation
-705
Daps
8,223
Reppin
NULL
01 team had Nash and Finley, put a KG that averages 21/12/1/2(He turned it up to 24/19 in the playoffs) on a team with Finley averaging 20, and Nash averaging 18/7. Keep in mind Dirk only averaged 23 that year. You telling me you wouldn't take the hit offensively for a major defensive upgrade?

Sorry im typing on the phone i meant to type 2011 the year they won the title
 

Walt

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
11,855
Reputation
12,535
Daps
73,309
Except basketball has never and will never work like that. You can't just add KG to the Mavs in '01 and expect the numbers to transfer across the boards. You add KG and the offense changes in such a way that Nash and Finley's numbers might go down because the flow of the offense would change based on KG's game. Dirk creates mismathces on the offensive side of the ball, opens up lanes and changes spacing in a way KG never could. I completely reject the idea that the difference on the offensive side between Dirk and KG is negligible, while the difference on the defensive side is a chasm. You can't judge offense by comparing 24 points to 21 and deciding that those 3 points don't matter much. KG is simply not even fukking close to dirk's level as a offensive genius.

Dirk flamed out once to an 8 seed, but just about every other playoff loss was to a very good team, even when the Mavs were seeded higher, in a tough Western conference where seeds 1-5 were all capable of making runs to the conference finals depending on who they matched up with in the playoffs. Dirk also - come rain or shine - made Dallas good for 50-60 wins every year for a decade. In that sense, he was Tim Duncan lite. And KG doesn't have that to his credit. KG was done no favors by the Minny front office, but that still doesn't completely excuse all those years of not even making the playoffs.

Dirk won a championship against 3 future hall of famers including a guy who will be in the conversation for GOAT and another who will be in the conversation for top 5-7 shooting guards of all of all time, and he did it with old and spare parts. J. Kidd put up 8 & 8, shot 36%, and couldn't keep any guards in front of him on D. JJ Barea can barely contribute to the Wolves, and he was a significant part of that Mavs squad. Dirk's championship run was quite clearly and simply one of the most awesome runs a superstar has had.

I agree with @Malta - you can easily build around Dirk. KG is the ultimate player to add to a team. Also, Dirk's skillset isn't one that falls off a cliff with age. While Struggle knees is shooting 35% and stinking it up in Brooklyn, Dirk is putting up 21 a game on 47% shooting, still. That's remarkable.
 

Goatpoacher

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
8,456
Reputation
590
Daps
16,183
Also, Dirk's skillset isn't one that falls off a cliff with age. While Struggle knees is shooting 35% and stinking it up in Brooklyn, Dirk is putting up 21 a game on 47% shooting, still. That's remarkable.

I'll admit that DIrk's post prime career is better than KG's. But you are letting the present cloud what was actually true. IN their primes, KG was the better player. In their prime, KG was right below TD whereas Dirk was trading places with Chris Webber and Antonio McDyess.
 

GoogleMe

$ ¥ € £ $
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Messages
2,178
Reputation
410
Daps
3,402
Reppin
The Street
Duncan carried the 03 Spurs more so than Durk did on the 2011 Mavs

Duncan was really everything for that Spurs squad.


tumblr_lo90c6ZTom1qfqpjt.gif
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
46,237
Reputation
3,350
Daps
113,503
Reppin
NULL
The problem is that KG had 2 teammates who averaged over 20 in the 02' First rd and still couldn't win a game.

They lost because they couldn't stop dirk and company. Where was KG 's defensive impact?

That Dallas team was an offensive juggernaut and Flip was just getting his feet wet in coaching for real......Donnie gave him that work...Plain and Simple
 

the cool

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,337
Reputation
-7,446
Daps
51,682
I'll admit that DIrk's post prime career is better than KG's. But you are letting the present cloud what was actually true. IN their primes, KG was the better player. In their prime, KG was right below TD whereas Dirk was trading places with Chris Webber and Antonio McDyess.
I don't remember any memorable playoff game kg has ever had

Kg is not a number 1 scoring option. Dirk was avg 9 boards a game in 2003. Two less a game than Garnett. Put Garnett on the Mavs and teams will focus more on Finley. Nash wasn't a scorer til he got to Phoenix
 

Goatpoacher

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
8,456
Reputation
590
Daps
16,183
I don't remember any memorable playoff game kg has ever had

Kg is not a number 1 scoring option. Dirk was avg 9 boards a game in 2003. Two less a game than Garnett. Put Garnett on the Mavs and teams will focus more on Finley. Nash wasn't a scorer til he got to Phoenix

You also don't remember complete collapses to inferior teams like the mavs in 2006 and 2007.
 

GoogleMe

$ ¥ € £ $
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Messages
2,178
Reputation
410
Daps
3,402
Reppin
The Street
http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/...smavericks&id=4698370&city=dallas&src=desktop

"No, it was a show of respect," James told reporters in Miami after the game. "Dirk is one of my favorite guys. I love the way he approaches the game, the way he plays the game, he's amazing, obviously, we all know that. But I took that from him. I don't do that as well as him, though. He's been doing it a lot longer than me."

Durant mentioned that when he was 13, Nowitzki was 23 and the young gunner was already working on Nowitzki's patented shot. "Sorry I'm making Dirk seem a little bit old, but that's when I started focusing on Dirk, and he became one of my favorite players to ever play this game."
 
Top