It's an expression from the old Jim ROme show.
That's a new slur for AAs made up by this large man.
No because ive taken an extensive course on Anthropology, geography, and history.And you know this how? Cause some crakkkas told you.
The evidence of black people in the Americas before Europeans is clear cut. The first humans on the American continent were black (see Luzia woman fossil). The first civilizations in the Americas were black (see the Olmecs). And the first Europeans who came here wrote about encountering native black populations (see the writings of Christopher Columbus). The evidence is OVERWHELMING.
With regard to the Pacific Islanders, I see you're pushing this lie crakkkas made up about them being closer to Asians than us. Well I don't about you, but when I see this picture, I see our people and not Asians:
This women look no different than any black woman here in America or the Caribbean and yet they are from Vanuatu.
Those 'natives' are probably white. Real natives look like a mixture of pacific islanders and Asians because that's where their DNA structure lies
I know what time it is...we don't have tone-based class divisions in our ethnic group anymore. 
I RARELY see Haitians that look like this. 
Never. American is a made up thing that anybody can be. To be an english person for example is through blood. It would be like a German calling themselves Ghanaian or a a ghanaian going to China and calling themselves Chinese.
No it's not ethnic specific. I refer to everyone as clones. Even in the Haitian threads or haitian forums.
Those 'natives' are probably white. Real natives look like a mixture of pacific islanders and Asians because that's where their DNA structure lies
This guy doesn't look white
thats a drawing made by dutch people. Here is a rendering of what a dutch person thinks jesus looked likeNo. Real Native Americans look like this. Early Descriptions of New Netherland | Dutch Treat
This is one of the earliest depictions of Native Americans in North America made in 1671 by the Dutch.
You tell me who this looks more like? Us black folks? Or that asian looking guy you posted?
What i have said is that "americans are too diverse for you to call it on looks alone"Why is @Intruder v3.0 so upset about people having distinct looks? It's ok. You can continue posting light-skinned haitians and putting them in the mix
I used to see AAs that looked like this every day, and they weren't elite at all, just regular ass nikkas.
Keep y'all c00n franco-spanish latin fukkery to yourselves my g.
thats a drawing made by dutch people. Here is a rendering of what a dutch person thinks jesus looked like
those paintings are from the late 1700s early 1800s. How can you dismiss the dutch artist for never seeing Jesus, when this never saw who was on the continent before the colonists arrived either?I'm confused. What point are you trying to make? The guy who painted that picture never saw Jesus. We know that. Just like every other picture of Jesus was painted by people who never saw him.
On the other hand, the picture in question was made by someone who was actually there and saw the Native Americans and drew their picture. That is why that picture is so telling. It was made first hand and shows us that the people who occupied this continent do not look like what we've been told. What they looked like was clearly black. And don't think that the only picture. There are more.
Here are some more representations of Native Americans by the first whites on this continent and you'll see they show them as being unmistakably black:
That one nikka in the middle look like Waka Flocka Flame.