It's a funner job.So why aren't fighter pilots quitting?
It's a funner job.So why aren't fighter pilots quitting?
Why should I?Speaking of serving @Napoleon talks a big game about American pride and all that horseshyt..... wonder why he doesn't serve?
Another immature argument.Only plus is it keeps the pilots physically safe, at the expense of their consciences and collective sanity. Seems like a wash to me and isn't demonizing technology at all. Technology has other uses besides killing people.
So make an argument worth replying toYou deem anything that doesn't jive with your worldview as such.
I never said the govt isn't responsible for the welfare of its pilots, but I don't see how this elevates the responsibility of dronesWhy should the pilots bear all the responsibility for their own mental health?US govt is obligated to help them in that regard just like with PTSD and other war related emotional issues.
So...what are you against? Hi-res cameras on drones that pilots have to view?![]()
If those countries are so incompetent why do we need a trillion dollar a year army to keep them in checkWhy should I?
I acknowledge that the US has provided me DIRECT benefits as a result of living here, thus making it possible for its citizens to do bigger and better things knowing that most other concerns are taken care of internationally.
Some nations can't even build roads successfully...good luck with them trying to strong arm anyone else on ANY matter.

Higher Learnin gettin more policed now?![]()

lol that's for Congress not the Coli breh.ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.
First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
![]()
![]()
The masses being who? Domestic? OK. I think there should be limits.to give a blanketed understanding of what i'm against;
I am against agencies of any country or any government utilizing technology to spy upon the masses with the intentions of removing privacy for the purpose of "just in case". now if they can accurately and without doubt prove that the individuals being observed or monitored pose legitimate threat to my safety or others then have at it. but no, hi-res cameras on drones isn't an issue. hi-res cameras on drones is as dangerous as hi-res cameras on smart watches.
We provide security around the world for nations who can't even fathom investing in their own ability to provide for their own defense. And we therefore get things in return from themIf those countries are so incompetent why do we need a trillion dollar a year army to keep them in check![]()
The topic of geopolitics has nothing to do with the selective interpretation of controversial opinions.And we are done talking until u can reconcile our wanton use of force abroad with your anger at the mods for consolidating/deleting/moving your bullshyt posts/threads. U cool with push button murder but can't deal with moderators using technology to mitigate your bullshyt ass posts :biggapls:
The masses being who? Domestic? OK. I think there should be limits.
International? No. I hope the CIA knows everything about any remotely suspicious act and makes moves that elevate the leverage the USA has in all regards.
Don't like it? Then ask China, Russia, India, Brazil, and countless other nations what they're doing while you're asleep.
lol that's for Congress not the Coli breh.
Well...I'm not.Reading comprehension is very important my friend, so I'll ask you to reread my post you quoted to under my usage of "the masses" is directly related to me saying "I am against agencies of any country or any government"
and your ask other nations portions of the quoted posting makes absolutely no sense to what I said but ok.

“A typical person doing this mission over the last seven or eight years has worked either six or seven days a week, twelve hours a day,” General Welsh told NPR recently. “And that one- or two-day break at the end of it is really not enough time to take care of that family and the rest of your life.”
Thats what I'm saying. The article isn't even saying shyt.This section of the article needs to be removed. It adds nothing of value. This lifestyle is no different than a traveling consultant.