
CAC Style Group Economics could do it. Wealthy Blacks coming together to form super-conglomerates of financing for vocations in their preferred spheres of influence. Each conglomerate is assigned an area of the country with divisions handling high school, college, and post-graduate career guidance and employment. Along with.a special division for gov't lobbying on the local, state, and federal lvl.

For example:
If Bobby is a multi-millionaire CEO of an architecture firm in Atlanta, he gets with his fellow Black business and community ldrs to pool their wealth. Bobby handles architecture, so he begins farming HS students with an interest in architecture to guide them to sympathetic centers of higher education where they pursue degrees in that field with contracts guaranteeing them jobs in that field upon graduation with Bobby's chosen firms first, then they'll have the option to either form a partnership with Bobby and strike out on their own, with all of the conglomerate's connections, or continue under Bobby.
Through partnerships with sympathetic politicians, Bobby's political bagman (lobbyist) is able to acquire gov't contracts on all lvls for the partners of this conglomerate. He's also able to acquire gov't funds for the schools educating the future architects in their classrooms. This would actually require 3 diff divisions of bagmen for the 3 diff lvls of gov't. Perhaps at the federal lvl partnerships are formed with international gov'ts as well to contract out big gov't jobs.
Looking back at history, none of these captain of industry CACz got to where they are but the free market alone. They got their money up a bit, got down with a lobbying firm, and started getting huge gov't contracts creating not only generational wealth for their cohorts but influence in the legislative branch that created laws that unfairly fav0red their interests. Why else do u think nikkas on that libertarian free market bullshyt look like idiots to the very proponents of that ideology?
Why else do u think gangsters got down with prohibition before legitimizing themselves in gov't? They needed a black (untraceable) source of income to start buying off politicians to prop up their "Ma and Pa scrappy upstarts".
The only thing you have to deliver to the politicians is votes, and once you've guided the communities to see things the way your conglomerate sees them, you'll be able to deliver votes AND groom non-c00n non-subversive representatives in gov't to back you directly. Like having members in the gov't instead of being on the outside just funneling votes and cash. The stronger your lobbying network is, the farther your people get away from unemployment and poverty.
Of course this is all pie in the sky bullshyt without the CIA AND law enforcement's jankiness factored in, but there's always a clear and present danger from intelligence agencies and law enforcement when it comes to group economics because it disturbs the old order that's already entrenched.
But once financing is secured and the lobby is up and running, that's it. Pretty soon it would be possible for your reps in gov't to even tell the real janky Iran Contra types to back off.

We would just have to live long enough to get embedded in gov't.
