From The New Yorker: "My Great-Grandfather, the Nigerian Slave-Trader"

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
23,604
Reputation
7,375
Daps
114,932
:francis:

Catholicism is a branch of Christianity, not the whole tree. There were only 25,000 Catholics in the Colonies by the late-18th Century. The remaining 2.9 million+ Colonists were Protestant/Anglican/Quakers/Baptists/Congregationalists/Lutherans/Methodists/Jews.

The Pope's word carried very little to no weight in America or Europe thanks to the Great Schism and the Reformation.

That's why saying Christians, worldwide, lead the way for the abolition of slavery is an objectively, historically, true statement.​
Oh my gosh. Catholics are by far the largest group of Christians. It is not even close. If you are Protestant you are in the minority of Christians and 200 or 300 years ago the Protestant sects were definitely in the minority. In fact to even be a Protestant means that you are protesting the Catholic Church and the Pope.

Almost all of the colonies in the Caribbean, Central and South America were and are Catholic. None of the Christians, whether Catholic or Protestant were anti-slavery initially except for the Quakers.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,045
Daps
122,408
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Oh my gosh. Catholics are by far the largest group of Christians.
That bears nothing on the truth of the statement regarding Christians' abolishing slavery since ALL Christians are not Catholic, and, not ALL Catholics held/hold the same view as the Pope, then or now.

Then again, since you feel that the Pope holds that much sway over ALL Christendom....


[W]e have judged that it belonged to Our pastoral solicitude to exert Ourselves to turn away the Faithful from the inhuman slave trade in Negroes and all other men. ... [D]esiring to remove such a shame from all the Christian nations, having fully reflected over the whole question and having taken the advice of many of Our Venerable Brothers the Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church, and walking in the footsteps of Our Predecessors, We warn and adjure earnestly in the Lord faithful Christians of every condition that no one in the future dare to vex anyone, despoil him of his possessions, reduce to servitude, or lend aid and favour to those who give themselves up to these practices, or exercise that inhuman traffic by which the Blacks, as if they were not men but rather animals, having been brought into servitude, in no matter what way, are, without any distinction, in contempt of the rights of justice and humanity, bought, sold, and devoted sometimes to the hardest labour. ... We reprove, then, by virtue of Our Apostolic Authority, all the practices abovementioned as absolutely unworthy of the Christian name. By the same Authority We prohibit and strictly forbid any Ecclesiastic or lay person from presuming to defend as permissible this traffic in Blacks under no matter what pretext or excuse, or from publishing or teaching in any manner whatsoever, in public or privately, opinions contrary to what We have set forth in this Apostolic Letter.
 
Last edited:

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,045
Daps
122,408
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks

Bonk

God’s Son
Supporter
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
4,430
Reputation
1,139
Daps
16,770
Reppin
In Da 15th
Oh my gosh. Catholics are by far the largest group of Christians. It is not even close. If you are Protestant you are in the minority of Christians and 200 or 300 years ago the Protestant sects were definitely in the minority. In fact to even be a Protestant means that you are protesting the Catholic Church and the Pope.

Almost all of the colonies in the Caribbean, Central and South America were and are Catholic. None of the Christians, whether Catholic or Protestant were anti-slavery initially except for the Quakers.

That post is always disingenuous with his pseudo-history.

A meagre 29,000 out of 2.9million were Catholics? The number logically doesn’t make any sense whatsoever since Irish & Scots are Catholics and they were just as many as the English Protestants. And you also had the French who are predominately Catholics.

You don’t even need to open a book to know he’s lying.
 

Bonk

God’s Son
Supporter
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
4,430
Reputation
1,139
Daps
16,770
Reppin
In Da 15th
some truths but mixed with :childplease: :wtf:

Thanks.

I watched some old interview between a female Jewish professor & a Rabbi where both claimed Christopher Columbus was Jewish & most of the people on his voyage to the Americas were Jewish. They provided proofs, including letters.

Apparently, at the time, Jews in Spain was asked to either convert to Catholic or leave the country. Some of the ones that neither left nor converted decided to join him on his voyage.

Any truth to this?
 

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
29,263
Reputation
9,695
Daps
82,485
Thanks.

I watched some old interview between a female Jewish professor & a Rabbi where both claimed Christopher Columbus was Jewish & most of the people on his voyage to the Americas were Jewish. They provided proofs, including letters.

Apparently, at the time, Jews in Spain was asked to either convert to Catholic or leave the country. Some of the ones that neither left nor converted decided to join him on his voyage.

Any truth to this?

yes

.

 

Bonk

God’s Son
Supporter
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
4,430
Reputation
1,139
Daps
16,770
Reppin
In Da 15th

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,045
Daps
122,408
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
That post is always disingenuous with his pseudo-history.

A meagre 29,000 out of 2.9million were Catholics? The number logically doesn’t make any sense whatsoever
Don't have to rely on logic when objective, historical data exists.....and I NEVER lie.....


Antonelli’s letter giving Carroll responsibility for the U.S. mission also directed
the new prefect-apostolic to report on the condition of the American Church. Carroll’s
March 1785 response to Propaganda Fide, based on input from the twenty-four priests
in the country at the time (nineteen in Maryland and five in Pennsylvania), provided a
quantitative and qualitative assessment of the Church’s condition. Carroll’s
approximation of the number of Catholics in the country included: 15,800 in Maryland
(3,800 of them enslaved Negroes); 7,000 in Pennsylvania; 200 in Virginia; and 1,500 in

New York. Regarding the region to the south extending from the Mississippi River to the
Atlantic Coast, Carroll reported that “this tract of country contains, I hear, many
Catholics, formerly Canadians, who speak French, and I fear that they are destitute of
priests.” Although Carroll correctly identified the descendents of French-speaking
Catholics expelled from eastern Canada by the British around mid-century, he made no
mention that the territory also contained Catholics whose religious affiliation stemmed
from Spain’s and France’s colonization of the region. At the time of his letter Carroll
could not have known that Louisiana would become part of the United States in 1803;
neither could he have known that it would fall to him to assume temporary ecclesiastical authority over the region’s fifteen thousand French- and Spanish-descended Catholics,

further straining his meager resources. ~pgs. 92-93

You SHOULD read a couple things, like I do, to validate a claim instead of dismissing it as a lie because of a preexisting ideology.

29,000 Catholics out of 3 million Colonists is entirely plausible AND documented.

Neither pseudohistory, nor disingenuous.

Historical fact.

Here's his LinkedIn in case you have questions...

 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
4,835
Reputation
4,708
Daps
24,552
Thanks.

I watched some old interview between a female Jewish professor & a Rabbi where both claimed Christopher Columbus was Jewish & most of the people on his voyage to the Americas were Jewish. They provided proofs, including letters.

Apparently, at the time, Jews in Spain was asked to either convert to Catholic or leave the country. Some of the ones that neither left nor converted decided to join him on his voyage.

Any truth to this?

Screenshot-20221120-161751-Chrome.jpg


Screenshot-20221120-161903-Chrome.jpg


Source: Documents illustrative of the history of the slave trade to America. v.1.
 
Last edited:

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,045
Daps
122,408
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
@Bonk

@Samori Toure

I provided you with objective PROOF of my assertion. The link is in the post so you can download and read it for yourself. Also, check the footnotes. You can also contact the author via his LinkedIn.

There were only ~29,000 Catholics in Colonial America until the early-19th Century.

Even less Jews.

The Pope's word was pretty-much meaningless.

This is not a lie, but historical fact.​
 

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
23,604
Reputation
7,375
Daps
114,932
@Bonk

@Samori Toure

I provided you with objective PROOF of my assertion. The link is in the post so you can download and read it for yourself. Also, check the footnotes. You can also contact the author via his LinkedIn.

There were only ~29,000 Catholics in Colonial America until the early-19th Century.

Even less Jews.

The Pope's word was pretty-much meaningless.

This is not a lie, but historical fact.​
Colonial America as in England. However, Spain and France also had colonies in what is now the USA (Texas, Florida, Louisiana territories and the Great Lakes Regions.) Those were Catholics.

Then there was the vast number of Catholics in the Caribbean, Central and South America. So most of the slave owners in the Americas were Catholics. Then on top of that the Protestant slave owners in Colonial America were definitely pro-slavery.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,045
Daps
122,408
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Colonial America as in England.
The Louisiana Territory Catholics were accounted for in the earlier post and I specified that was the late-18th Century.

The argument isn't whether or not most Christians were pro/anti-slavery.

The argument is that Christians lead the way for the abolition of slavery.

Also, the earlier list has several Spanish and French Colonies in South America/Central America outlawing slavery before America.

Haiti was liberated by a Catholic.

As far as 'the Protestant slave owners', they were a minority of the population as only the 'rich' could afford them.​
 
Last edited:
Top