What is their to be ashamed of? I'm speaking about music that is relevant to me and came out during my time and what I think will become of it. Your a fan from a different era with a already pre-packaged notion that Kendrick is a bullshyt industry plant rapper that no one can like for real. You gave it a 3 1/2 which is cool cause I think that's as close to props as you'll give it. Nah people won't rewrite history, but people who came up during that time and who the music was made for will be able to give it it's proper place in history. The noobs comment

not everyone is fortunate enough to grow up with hip-hop so people gotta start somewhere.
I was specifically speaking on the comments that I quoted.
and yes, the stuff youre talking is revisionist history. waiting for new fans to prop something up in hindsight, mostly as a result of PR & propaganda......thats revisionist history.
yes, Kendrick is a plant. its been obvious for like 2 years now. just admit that you really don't know what a plant is.
Im not a fan from a different era. im a fan from ALL ERAS. go try to use these weak generalizations on someone else.
Because you said some stupid shyt all throughout your post. That's why I said it, shouldn't say stupid shyt.
1. No one compared it to Aquemini, unless you actually were, which would take away any kinda hip hop knowledge you think you have.
2. You said Section 80 was trash, which leads me to believe you've heard 0% of either album.
3. You called him a mid 2000s reject, that dont even begin to make sense. I doubt you even heard and of his 1st 4 mixtapes, to even know why he didn't blow up then.
also you agreeing with shine is the reason I can't take you serious
1. If you didn't get the aquemini comparison, then obviously the message just isn't for you and im simply talking over your head at this point.
2. now youre really sounding like a stan.
3. ive heard tracks. not impressed.
4. youre sounding like shyne hurt your feelings worst than I did.