He's not perfect, but where does Tariq Nasheed stand with you as a black voice in the media?

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
6,012
Daps
132,765
first off.....
coke, and who cares .... nobody is bringing up all the homo shyt you did in your youth.

lol, damn... you gonna go at my parenting?. Just because I called you on your bullshyt? Breh, I was married... and yeah i made mistakes, but i split custody and take care of all my kids and the mothers.. ON my own.. before age 30.... We have a great understanding.

:mjlol:and i don't even have a 9-5 like you. I said you are confused- How is that an insult? You come with all this person shyt...

well, why would u come with all this personal shyt........:patrice: We know that life isn't fair, you say I'm ignorant.. but only you are a working slave. You say I'm uneducated, but I been making more money than you since sohh plus a graduate degree, and you're a gottdamn scientist or something. Your ugly ass wife didn't even produce you any starved indian looking babies --- So you have to go hard at the fact that I have kids?

Point is... There is zero reason for your Indian ass to be hating on tariq or any other nikka that's trying to do something:camby:.
In case you didn't hear me the first 100 times, I could give a fukk about your life, or whatever you claim your life to be, so I didn't read that past 2 sentences. I just ask that if you want to address a topic with me, just speak on the topic without going into personal insults. Yeah I went there about parenting like I went in about your ex-wife leaving you. Every time I do so, it's in response to a personal attack against me, but you always start crying and trying to hide your hand after you threw a stone.

But anyway, nothing you say about me will get under my skin. I don't dislike you where I won't debate something with you. It's just the internet man. You could just either a.) stop responding to my posts or b.) respond on topic without personal invective.

Why you don't is some shyt for you to figure out.
 
Last edited:

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,469
Daps
246,399
i've never heard tariq advocate beating women. in fact, i listened to a macklession show not too long ago when he gave a nikka a verbal lashing for claiming he has to put hands on women

Can you link it?
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
54,998
Reputation
12,826
Daps
157,165
Can you link it?

too hard to find, breh. after TS claimed sotomayor stole his old stlyle, i marathoned his older shows cus i hadn't heard him go at BW like that.

but its true, tariq use to go hard on BW, but he never condoned violence against them. his thing seems to be just dismiss a woman if they arent trying to co-operate
 

↓R↑LYB

I trained Sheng Long and Shonuff
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
44,203
Reputation
13,800
Daps
171,196
Reppin
Pawgistan
I'm confused as hell by this whole thing. Ole girl sent Tariq a tweet out the blue saying fukk you, but he's the bad guy for addressing it :dahell:

Lot of disinfomation going aroun on twitter (another reason why I don't fukk with that petty ass site). I asked for evidence and replied bye, bye love :mjlol:

These are the broads y'all nikkas gotta deal with :dead:???

 

KingDanz

Veteran
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
15,428
Reputation
5,007
Daps
75,704
Reppin
NULL
:gladbron:

i tend to think of tariq like a shock jock. Dude is doing his job insanely well when people like her start making up shyt about him.
I think some Black feminists put her up to it. This all happening around the same time.
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
54,998
Reputation
12,826
Daps
157,165
Dawg on the ustream he JUST handled someone condoning that.
you're talkin about that guy that claimed he lost control and choked out a dyke in the club :heh: he didn't condone that either, but the one i listened to, he roasted ole boy.
 
Last edited:

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
6,012
Daps
132,765
Why is it bad to adapt to the fast processing information? I have problems with the inaccuracies but to claim ALL or even a majority of people who watched HC isn't doing further research is false. Heck, the fact that we know of the inaccuracies is proof. Tariq has created a dialogue and while stupid shyt like "the Olmecs were Black" drives me insane, he does STRESS group economics.

I don't think it's bad to adapt to fast processing info. It's positive development for society overall, but we need to be aware of its potential pitfalls as well. If people are just watching agenda-driven, well-marketed documentaries as a primary source of information, they're not going to be getting a healthy understanding of things, particularly topics as complex and nuanced as sociology, race, biology, history, etc. When you say do your research, we're both unaware of the % of watchers do their research after watching it. But we also have to define "research" here because to a lot of people, research is tracing back to their own biased "sources" as opposed to taking a comprehensive look at the matter.

If you learn about group economics through him, cool. Take those jewels and do something with it. Knowledge has no owners. The source of access isn't really important. It's honestly not about him as much as it is people stanning him on some cult-worship shyt. He says some truth and he mixes it in with bullshyt, like any preacher or hustler. But it's important to be smarter, and be able to distill the truth from the extra shyt, unemotionally. Just judging by my observations on the coli, that's not being done much on here.

nikka that's the damn problem wasn't nobody asking for no documentary from you :mjlol:

Get your thoughts out in 1-2 sentences breh. Wrap that shyt up b



Some things require more than a few soundbites or sentences to discuss holistically.
 
Top