That's been their downfall for centuries and continues to be their downfall today. This tribal instinct is why Islam is such an authoritative religion. It's meant to overcome virulent tribal fractiousness. The history of the various Caliphates also tends to go through long periods of anti-intellectualism.
My "propoganda" that descent into tribalism has always been in the background of Arab empires?
Step back and think critically for one second -- why did so many Muslim empires rely on neutral groups of slave-mercenaries to act as soldiers and civil servants? To avoid tribal influence.
I'm not pulling this out of the blue. This is a recurring theme in Arab history.
You can look at them and tell for the most part.good question, I'll respond with another question:
how can you tell the difference between a white person and a Jewish person if they were wearing the same exact clothing?
Absolutely NOT.
"Any" empire didn't create the Mamluks.
"Any" empire didn't create the Janissary corps.
There have been entire books about the genealogy of slave-soldiers and their influence on Arab history, bro.
You need to quit being so dismissive.
You name an empire. I've made my case.
That's a completely reductive version of what I said, and you're already moving the goalposts.
My point was not that tribalism did not exist anywhere. It was that Arab society was especially tribal.
Ad hominem.
You realized your argument was going nowhere and
Let me know when you're ready to have a discussion again.
EDIT -- and you know the funny thing? I never actually disparaged any intellectual accomplishment of Arab civilization. All I did was point out a difference between Jewish and Arab culture that explained the sustained level of Jewish economic success.
You're a fukkboy of the highest level.
The history of the various Caliphates also tends to go through long periods of anti-intellectualism.