I'm talking about the actual thread topic, ending school shootings. All that stuff you're talking about won't end them. Properly securing schools will.Bruh let's end this talking point right now. These mass shootings are not being done with illegal guns. These are being with legal owned guns. Having better regulation is not about punishing legal gun owners it's about protecting society and having more accountability. The good of society should trump all. Period.
These school districts and cities could most definitely “find” the money and resources for it, issue is they don’t care enough to do so.That cost money and isn't a viable option for each school especially when the majority of schools are strapped and resources as it is. That’s not even factoring how you obviously won’t get every state and district on board.
Every city and school district just doesn't have it like that and it's disingenuous to believe that they do. Hell, some of these small cities don't even have a police force or fire department to even help protect the city, so how could they hire one to protect the schools?These school districts and cities could most definitely “find” the money and resources for it, issue is they don’t care enough to do so.
I live in Texas and the amount of money these school districts waste on stupid shyt is ridiculous.
And don’t even get me started on how over funded these police departments are down here.
Look up how much the Uvalde Police Department was given annually in funding.
Only for them to stand around like a bunch of cowards the moment shyt got real.
Most cities police departments are no different from Uvalde’s.
They could easily invest that money they’re wasting on these incompetent pigs into protecting the kids instead.
They just don’t care to.
Ironically, the schools that don’t have the resources for it don’t seem to be the ones having the problem.
Obviously not all of them have it like that, but again, it doesn’t seem to be the demographics that “don’t have it like that” that are the problem.Every city and school district just doesn't have it like that and it's disingenuous to believe that they do. Hell, some of these small cities don't even have a police force or fire department to even help protect the city, so how could they hire one to protect the schools?
It's like posters forget that there are legit poor cities out here, but instead use theirs for the basis of their argument.
I know it’s hard for you to believe, but there are even poorer funded inner city schools than the ones that you know of.Obviously not all of them have it like that, but again, it doesn’t seem to be the demographics that “don’t have it like that” that are the problem.
Most of these school shootings are being done in middle class to upper middle class suburbs.
A kid from an impoverished community likely doesn’t have access to an AR-15.
You think his single mom who is busy working two jobs to support the family has an automatic rifle casually laying around?
You think she has the money to spend on ammo and can afford to pay the fees to practice at the range?
Nah it’s mostly the more well off CACs who are doing this shyt.
Even if you wanted to still make the argument that some of these suburban school districts don’t have the resources, there are ways around that.
If poorly funded inner city schools can afford to do it then others can as well.
Your logic is flawed, though.I know it’s hard for you to believe, but there are even poorer funded inner city schools than the ones that you know of.
Police officers just aren’t going to be an option in every school.
I’m not against properly securing schools. But you brought up illegal guns. My point is you have to create more of a deterrent before people even leave the house. I’m saying making it more costly to even mishandle a gun will make people think a lot harder before acting especially if them or loved ones will be economically impacted by bad decisions.I'm talking about the actual thread topic, ending school shootings. All that stuff you're talking about won't end them. Properly securing schools will.
That's not what I said at all. No where in my comment did I say that the option should be scrapped. You just made that assumption.Your logic is flawed, though.
You seem to think that because some districts can’t afford it, that means that we should just scrap the idea entirely.
The districts that can afford to implement it are typically the districts where these mass shootings are more likely to happen.
We'd have to change America's mentality regarding guns and that won't happen without a tragedy of epic proportions.
What tragedy? If it ain’t happened yet it won’t at allWe'd have to change America's mentality regarding guns and that won't happen without a tragedy of epic proportions.