Hey breh, have you considered switching the order of events? I think I’m following your logic and I don’t think it matters which way you do it.
Please correct me if I’m wrong here but effectively you are doing this equation: a + b = c.
- A = school (2yr commit)
- B= military(4yr commit) to pay off school
- C = successful career. After 6 years paying dues.
- a+b=c is similar to 2+4 =6.
Do you remember the commutative property from school? It states that a+b is equivalent to b+a in a addition equation because the end result doesn’t change. And I think we can abstract and apply this to your position. Why not just take the loans out( who gives a damn what it costs) and then commission as an officer? Have the gov pay for your loans while you are in the military getting experience, as an officer in construction field, from within the military. You should be able to add this clause to your contract. I’m familiar with the navy model, so
@Deuterion and
@Marc Spector can corrrect me here, but the USAF should have a construction community that’s equivalent to the Seabees( navy construction workers) . These officer gigs should also alleviate the lack of job mobility, getting bossed by children, and should pull you away from frontline work.
Any thoughts?