How does this make sense to you? Murray wouldn't be a greater role, importance or impact on offense over LMA and DeRozan, yet you think it's comparable to the Warriors without KD or Steph. And really that's beside the point of this thread, regardless of Dejounte playing or not, it still wouldn't change the offensive structure of the Spurs offense; LMA and DeRozan aren't suddenly going to stop taking long 2s and replace them with 3s all because of Dejounte.
Since this is basically singling me out - I've watched around 20 Spurs games this season, which is more than enough games to get a read on how they play, and this is more about how they play v. the rest of the league. Almost every single team's offense is centered around the 3-ball, you see it in their structure, their workings, their spacing, and the looks they generate on the back of it - the same can't be said for the Spurs (specifically their starting offense). There's not only an efficiency conflict with the Spurs offense, but there's a fundamental one where they aren't creating the spacing and scoring opportunities that other teams are (more importantly, teams with less talent).
I'm watching this game right now v. 76ers and I can see it, they're taking all these long 2s, and only attempted one 3. And it's only because LMA and DeRozan are that talented that sort of approach doesn't sink the team, cause nearly every other squad would be in near ruins right now.