Again it a starting point not the decisive factor. A bum with a job is better than a bum without one. I'm pretty sure....well I hope these chics are not making their final decision on a job and car alone.
![]()
they're both bums, who gives a fukk?
Women. It takes time to know someone, at least they eliminate the jobless one early. It's all part of having a set standard for yourself. A minimum requirement. I do the same a woman has to have a job and a car for me to even give her a chance. Then as I get to know her if she displays bird behavior she is dismissed.
this isn't strengthening your argument. so, use materials as a means to eliminate a person when the materials don't define the person to begin with. your argument makes little sense. maybe it's because this is logic of females (which i won't argue over because it opens another whole can of worms). the focus is on the wrong thing...
There is more than one person for everybody bruh.I think it's a stupid requirement because what if the only guy that will ever truly love you for you don't have a car when y'all cross paths? You gonna fukk that off for a car? Of course you'd fukk it off for a car. Second, say you got your own place and your own car and you meet a guy. He got his own apartment and hoopty too and y'all are going around for about a year and he get a call that he just sold his app and now he's rich. Seeing as how he's rich now do he get to flip the script on you and make it a requirement that his women gotta have an s class and a house in Telfair?
I dont see what you are crying about. If you dont have a job, why would you want to date a woman who requires them? You wouldnt be on the same page. People have the right to date who they want, and theres nothing unreasonable about wanting to be with someone who is in a certain place in life. Especially if you are at or past that place.this isn't strengthening your argument. so, use materials as a means to eliminate a person when the materials don't define the person to begin with. your argument makes little sense. maybe it's because this is logic of females (which i won't argue over because it opens another whole can of worms). the focus is on the wrong thing...
Again you can take ya broke nikka stand all you want but yes monetary vlaue is a big part in relationship. Facts finances is the 3rd biggest reasom of all divorces.
I dont see what you are crying about. If you dont have a job, why would you want to date a woman who requires them? You wouldnt be on the same page. People have the right to date who they want, and theres nothing unreasonable about wanting to be with someone who is in a certain place in life. Especially if you are at or past that place.
Come on, breh. She (and you) are going to have to have a means to do fun and interesting things. Having a car is all-important to do that. Transportation, shelter, and fun shyt to do. That's all you really need to at least try to get and keep a woman's interest.
don't get it twisted, i'm not arguing for being broke, i'm pointing out the obvious flaw in the system. and your point about finances being the third biggest reason leading to divorce doesn't mean shyt. sounds like people are requiring people to have jobs and cars and shyt but still breaking up with them later because of some financial reason. obviously focusing on finances isn't making marriages last longer. you keep on proving my point and making it more powerful honestly...