It could absolutely happen. But the true issue lies in the economy and the GDP. And in order to secure those things, the country would need to focus on developing a stellar defense system and have weapons of mass destruction. Plus, their own version of the CIA.
- Who is printing the money and dispersing it to banks? That's the number one question. Someone has to handle the flow of money and dictate the trade agreements.
You see, there is a reason why the U.S. has a CIA and an army that touches every single corner of the earth. It's to ensure that resources are delivered "cheaply" and to our benefit.
You can't make a profit unless you can buy products from China for $2 and sell it in America for $20. What happens if China decided to sell their products for $20? You'd have to raise your price. And if people in America can't pay it... well there's no profit... and if there's no profit, how are we gonna play on our smart phones and order Chick-Fil-A?
- What natural resources and/or industries will our country produce/dominate? Are there oil reserves?
- Who is investing in the industries? With what money? What will we have to pay back?
It all comes down to the money. The money. The money.
1. Who is producing the currency?
2. Who is dispersing it to the banks?
3. What are the interest rates?
4. What are the trade agreements?
5. How can we ensure those trade agreements stay in place?
You see, that's why you need weapons of mass destruction. Because when Ghaddafi wanted to make the Dinar the gold standard in Africa, USA, France and England bombed the shyt out of him real quick, turning Libya into a modern day slavery factory.
USA stays in control because they threaten violence to anyone who defies them. A West African nation's president could easily say, "NO MORE shytTY LOANS" "NO MORE CORRUPTION" and take the economy to new levels, stabilizing the nation to new levels.
The CIA would intervene; blowing up buildings, committing key murders and making it look like an internal fight... the IMF and World Bank would fund some poor, angry rebels living in remote areas of the country... sell them a narrative that the president doesn't care about them and purchase 1000 tanks and SUVs with tons of first class weapons to fukk the country up.
Once the country is at war... the damage is done. The infrastructure is ruined. People are murdered. The "chosen rebel" is now the President and receives instructions.
1. Take this money and enjoy a lavish lifestyle you've never experienced.
2. Your country is fukked up from war. Accept these loans and use the money to rebuild some of your infrastructure (which the new rebel President won't do... he'll use it to buy pretty women, travel to Europe and live lavish with his homies) …
3. When you can't repay those loans, the World Bank and IMF say "that's okay... if you can't pay with money, we will take your oil, your precious metals, your resources, the stuff that should and could go for trillions but we'll get that for pennies."
4. Stupid ass rebel corrupt president says, "okay cool, just keep the Moet flowing."
5. Meanwhile the residents of the country suffer in abject poverty.
6. Media gets involved with the same ol' tired narrative... "In a country where people suffer, disease is widespread, men rape children and war is rampant. How can we help and assist and aid these black animals who can't live with dignity? For $3.99, you too can give a little money to help a small black animal boy eat... call now, and spread democracy."
This is pretty much how it would go...
If you don't want that happening... you're going to need to fight back. So far... no country has the resources or the weapons to really... fight back.
Why do you think they're always looking "for weapons of mass destruction?" Why do you think it's always "a problem" whenever a country has a bomb? Why can't they have one? And why does America and all the Euro nations have more than they can ask?
Just something to think about...
There's traitors everywhere...
