If African Americans Had Their Own Country, Could It Be Successful?

[Emoryal]

If it's selective it might.

 

[Spiritual Stratocaster]

I'd be the first volunteer for the Special OPS unit that tracks/monitors/eliminates c00ns trying to stir up dissension that would be detrimental to the nation :

Like the Jews who hunted down them people who did the Munich Olympic attack.

 

[Scustin Bieburr]

Look at black communities and organizations. There is too much infighting and c00ning for everyone to get on the same page and work in the best interest of everyone in the society. One of the biggest issues is that there's always one or a small group that wants all the attention for themselves. This causes resentment and backlash. Look at how bitterly the elected government and president clings to power in so many African nations.

It will take time, just like how long it took European countries to stop beefing with each other long enough to get SOME semblance of peace on that continent and that was without constant interference from colonialists and neo colonialists.

Assuming that outsiders would deal with a hypothetical new black country with respect as equals, I think for it to succeed there would have to be:

- little prestige or strong financial incentives attached to the executive and judicial
branches of government

-strict and well enforced term limits

-strong judiciary that is actually given incentives for objectivity.

-room for everyone to contribute regardless of religion, culture, sexuality, gender and color. These things are usually fault lines in black communities and if these barriers are eliminated, everyone can contribute which means everyone can benefit.

 

[Luken]

It would look like Atlanta

with all the Battymon's too?

 

[#1 pick]

If White people would get rid of white supremacy as a system, it would be a great success. As long as white supremacy exist, it will fail

 

[Barnett114]

no... shyt will be a disaster point blank

not every african american is out here for growth and for the people.... stop living in fantasy and start living in reality

Everyone doesn't have to be great to run a successful country

 

[Elim Garak]

Yes if they got the type of backing from the United States Israel does.

 

[SirReginald]

Yes if they got the type of backing from the United States Israel does.

Good point, but this country hates Black folk.

 

[JahFocus CS]

Yes.

 

[UncleTomFord15]

No/thread .

 

[Steel]

It could absolutely happen. But the true issue lies in the economy and the GDP. And in order to secure those things, the country would need to focus on developing a stellar defense system and have weapons of mass destruction. Plus, their own version of the CIA.

- Who is printing the money and dispersing it to banks? That's the number one question. Someone has to handle the flow of money and dictate the trade agreements.

You see, there is a reason why the U.S. has a CIA and an army that touches every single corner of the earth. It's to ensure that resources are delivered "cheaply" and to our benefit.

You can't make a profit unless you can buy products from China for $2 and sell it in America for $20. What happens if China decided to sell their products for $20? You'd have to raise your price. And if people in America can't pay it... well there's no profit... and if there's no profit, how are we gonna play on our smart phones and order Chick-Fil-A?

- What natural resources and/or industries will our country produce/dominate? Are there oil reserves?

- Who is investing in the industries? With what money? What will we have to pay back?

It all comes down to the money. The money. The money.

1. Who is producing the currency?
2. Who is dispersing it to the banks?
3. What are the interest rates?
4. What are the trade agreements?
5. How can we ensure those trade agreements stay in place?

You see, that's why you need weapons of mass destruction. Because when Ghaddafi wanted to make the Dinar the gold standard in Africa, USA, France and England bombed the shyt out of him real quick, turning Libya into a modern day slavery factory.

USA stays in control because they threaten violence to anyone who defies them. A West African nation's president could easily say, "NO MORE shytTY LOANS" "NO MORE CORRUPTION" and take the economy to new levels, stabilizing the nation to new levels.

The CIA would intervene; blowing up buildings, committing key murders and making it look like an internal fight... the IMF and World Bank would fund some poor, angry rebels living in remote areas of the country... sell them a narrative that the president doesn't care about them and purchase 1000 tanks and SUVs with tons of first class weapons to fukk the country up.


Once the country is at war... the damage is done. The infrastructure is ruined. People are murdered. The "chosen rebel" is now the President and receives instructions.

1. Take this money and enjoy a lavish lifestyle you've never experienced.
2. Your country is fukked up from war. Accept these loans and use the money to rebuild some of your infrastructure (which the new rebel President won't do... he'll use it to buy pretty women, travel to Europe and live lavish with his homies) …
3. When you can't repay those loans, the World Bank and IMF say "that's okay... if you can't pay with money, we will take your oil, your precious metals, your resources, the stuff that should and could go for trillions but we'll get that for pennies."
4. Stupid ass rebel corrupt president says, "okay cool, just keep the Moet flowing."
5. Meanwhile the residents of the country suffer in abject poverty.
6. Media gets involved with the same ol' tired narrative... "In a country where people suffer, disease is widespread, men rape children and war is rampant. How can we help and assist and aid these black animals who can't live with dignity? For $3.99, you too can give a little money to help a small black animal boy eat... call now, and spread democracy."

This is pretty much how it would go...

If you don't want that happening... you're going to need to fight back. So far... no country has the resources or the weapons to really... fight back.

Why do you think they're always looking "for weapons of mass destruction?" Why do you think it's always "a problem" whenever a country has a bomb? Why can't they have one? And why does America and all the Euro nations have more than they can ask?

Just something to think about...

Facts back in undergrad I took a political science class and this point was heavily emphasized. At the hear of economics and politics is Violence period, The US got a foot up on Europe and Asia after ww2 and been on the worlds neck ever since. That’s why our military is insane

 

[skokiaan]

when you cant even stand together against a common enemy what makes you think...nvm


like the other brehs mentioned, black people are tribalistic and not nationalistic and this is evident both in africa and the diaspora. this makes it easier for outsiders to infiltrate us. plus look at the liberian situation and the state of black majority areas (led by elected black politicians etc) both in US and UK.

 

[Behind-the-wheel]

I don't believe that it would last very long.

Every time black people get something started...whites come in and wreck it.
Tulsa, Black Wall Street, Chicago, Harlem...

If black people DID "Go back to Africa" you can bet your ass that cacs would send over nukes and obliterate us from the planet.
Right now, the safest thing we can do is be all up and through the USA so that they can't take out mass amounts of us without taking themselves out too. I promise you, they're just waiting for us all to get together in one spot so they can send a bomb over.

 

[Thurgood Thurston III]

I think the biggest issue would be getting black people to migrate to the new country in the first place. You would have to do something to convince them like free land.
Also you're going to still have a small minority of non-black people due to interracial marriages.

What do you think about going the "zionist" route? Like lobbying and bribing politicians for the new country.