Interesting question - are Australian Aboriginals black?

King

The black man is always targeted.
Joined
Apr 8, 2017
Messages
19,427
Reputation
4,343
Daps
82,591
Says the guy who doesn't know the difference between 'race' and ethnicity.....and I'm the one hitting YOU with facts.

:russ:
“I know you are but what am I” headass :mjlol:

Dude says this after I literally prove that he doesn’t know the difference between race and ethnicity. Multiple times.

Been hitting his ass with facts this whole time and he still can’t see how wrong he is. So wrong in fact, I use his own thread to prove how wrong he is.

Y’all kill me, just as dumb as you wanna be.
 

King

The black man is always targeted.
Joined
Apr 8, 2017
Messages
19,427
Reputation
4,343
Daps
82,591
"Says 'race is pseudoscience', then says Black is a race"-head ass!


:umad:
That’s you, retard.

Read this:

 

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
16,728
Reputation
2,993
Daps
78,253
Reppin
NULL
If you took a group of Africans 100,000 years ago, put some on Continental Europe and some in Greenland (for the sake of this question, Greenland is habitable) and both groups developed white skin, blue eyes and thin noses, would they both be white? Or would they be different races?
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,164
Daps
122,368
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Last edited:

3rdWorld

Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
47,797
Reputation
4,768
Daps
140,047
Theyre not Black..not everyone with dark skin is Black :comeon:

Same as dark skinned Indians are not Black in any shape way or form.
indian-man-texting-m.jpg


This insistance of suggesting anyone with a tan and dark hair is somehow Black and immediately invited to the cookout is how Black Americans keep conceding property and intellectual property to non Blacks.
:snoop:
 

King

The black man is always targeted.
Joined
Apr 8, 2017
Messages
19,427
Reputation
4,343
Daps
82,591

No, that's YOU, goofy........





:russ:
Exactly retard.

Black is considered a race. It is literally one of the racial types.

You would know this if you read your own bullshyt thread you post everywhere.

Do I have to remind your smooth brained ass yet again?




 

King

The black man is always targeted.
Joined
Apr 8, 2017
Messages
19,427
Reputation
4,343
Daps
82,591
Theyre not Black..not everyone with dark skin is Black :comeon:

Same as dark skinned Indians are not Black in any shape way or form.
indian-man-texting-m.jpg


This insistance of suggesting anyone with a tan and dark hair is somehow Black and immediately invited to the cookout is how Black Americans keep conceding property and intellectual property to non Blacks.
:snoop:
You didn’t read my original post. Race is NOT ethnicity OR nationality.

Black =/= Black American.

Why? Because Black American is an ETHNICITY NOT A RACE.

Black = Negro = Negroid under race as a social construct created by Europeans in the 1700z

If anything it’s been used by non-black diaspora as an insult.

There are Black South Americans, Black Latinos, Black Europeans, etc.

I get what you’re saying but you’re misunderstood. Black people in America do not have a singular identity to unify under, therefore we identify as black out of necessity. In reality, it’s no different than identifying as a Negro as harsh as it sounds.

When in reality, we should be more specific. African American was a start, but it was too broad and basically included the diaspora by definition.

A better term is ADOS (African Descent of Slaves). That would eliminate others hopping in and out of our ethnic group because we have no clear definition. That is the consequence of us being a people with no clear terminology to define us.
 

Zime

Superstar
Joined
Oct 26, 2017
Messages
5,717
Reputation
79
Daps
19,200
They black but they not African I guess
 

King

The black man is always targeted.
Joined
Apr 8, 2017
Messages
19,427
Reputation
4,343
Daps
82,591
If you took a group of Africans 100,000 years ago, put some on Continental Europe and some in Greenland (for the sake of this question, Greenland is habitable) and both groups developed white skin, blue eyes and thin noses, would they both be white? Or would they be different races?
You forget that race is a made up concept by Europeans in the 1700s. It is made up. It’s fiction. To answer your question: it depends on whatever a European man in the 1700s would classify them as. Why? Because it’s made up and they created it.

Race is a pseudoscience that has been debunked by science. Human genetics debunk the false idea of race.

Not saying it isn’t a social reality, but biologically it’s fake.
Same thing with sports teams, we know at the end of the day it’s made up shyt. But it’s a social reality that people are invested in and take very seriously.

No different then asking “if you took some Patriots fans and let them live in New York for a few years, and they started rocking Giants gear, would they still be Patriots fans?”

Think of this like the matrix.
 

The Burger King

Fast Food Gangsta
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Dec 20, 2013
Messages
8,881
Reputation
13,981
Daps
84,691
Reppin
East Whopper City
Scientifically are they black? I don’t know.

But looking at her, yes I would consider her a black woman even if she’s not of African ancestry.

Just not African American.
 

RadaMillz

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
11,995
Reputation
2,871
Daps
61,555
Reppin
Harlem, Uganda
I was always fascinated at how did the indigenous population of the andaman islands, papua new guinea, the philippines, fiji and Australia were able to retain their black features. They have been separated from the motherland for tens of thousands of years.
 
Top