I grew up watching Wolves games. The crunch time thing isn't a myth. And its not that he choked, its just that he wasn't a 'go get a basket' type like most of the stars of that time. T-Mac, AI, VC, all those guys' main strength was as a scorer and that was in the middle of the hero ball era. KG always needed another guy to be the primary ball handler/playmaker in the last few minutes which is why he and Marbury were a perfect fit and why he thrived wen he had Cassell/Spree or Rondo/Pierce playing next to him
I also grew up watching Wolves games but nope, sorry, it is a myth and it's not backed up by the numbers.
Look at his clutch scoring numbers during his prime / peak for example.
02-03:
41/74 FGs. Ranked 17th in total clutch points this season.
03-04:
43/93 FGs. Ranked 8th in total clutch points.
04-05:
40/83 FGs. Ranked 15th in total clutch points.
He consistently placed himself in the top 20 in total clutch points for each of his prime seasons. Those are lists that heavily favor perimeter players btw, yet KG was always amongst the highest rated big guys.
When you account for efficiency, there's really no way to argue that you rather have Iverson, T-Mac etc. in the clutch since KG was scoring close to their level in the clutch with superior efficiency. Btw, he ranks above Duncan in almost every year, yet somehow you'd never hear anyone say "Duncan couldn't go get your team a basket!". It's a stupid argument to begin with and it's only done with KG because people tried to justify why the team wasn't winning (when the public was stupid enough not to understand that the team matters).
He didn't thrive with Cassell and Pierce etc. because they handled things in the clutch, it was because they were really good players. Again, Garnett was the Celtics 4th quarter and clutch leading scorer during their title run. Yet, Pierce is believed to be their 1st option, main guy in the clutch etc.
Pierce was 1/14 in FGs during the clutch during their playoff run in 2008. KG was 9/20.....