Is Mahomes the best QB you've ever seen?

Is Mahomes the best QB you've ever seen

  • Yes

    Votes: 141 56.2%
  • No

    Votes: 110 43.8%

  • Total voters
    251

FabTrey

Superstar
Joined
Apr 2, 2017
Messages
13,432
Reputation
-1,523
Daps
29,320
Mahomes was reading the D and changing protections and audibiling his first year starting.
They didn't let Brady do that to year 3 - 4.
Mahomes was forced to rely on protection and thinking against the Bengals, did that bite him in the ass?
Stop it, Brady is nice but he isn't in the same stratosphere as Manning at pre snap reads and adjustments, nor Rodgers.


Brady and Manning are tier 1 when it comes to being the most cerebral QB. Brady became better simply because Brady doesn't overthink like Manning and played better against tougher D. Seattle SB is a classic example. How Brady neutralized their weaknesses was a master class. Manning's biggest downfall is that he was too smart for his own good.

I got nothing but respect for manning, but saying brady isn't up there with manning when it comes to reading the D is so 2009.

Rodgers is 3-4 tier below brady/manning. Rodgers ad libs way too much.
 

Joe Sixpack

Build and Destroy
Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
40,609
Reputation
5,486
Daps
114,124
Reppin
Rotten Apple
Played a dominant pats team. And mcflabb was a good qb, not a great one.

Reid resurrected Vick and Smith's career. Qb whisperer for sire.

He didn’t win BIG until he got Mahomes

I’m not trying to shyt on Andy Reid either he’s a great coach but he didn’t win anything until Mahomes

You need the great coach AND the once in a generation QB in order to make magic happen

Just look at the history of the NFL
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
53,581
Reputation
20,051
Daps
293,253
Mahomes needs to win more chips before anyone can say he's better than Brady. But from a sheer talent perspective, the same way I felt Rodgers was more talented than Brady I feel the same about Mahomes. He's also doing something that no one has done: sustained winning post-rookie contract, in this era where the big QB extension dooms teams. Lost the fastest and one of the best WRs in the league and you wouldn't even know it.

I don't think Mahomes or any QB needs seven rings or more to become the GOAT. It's a different era. If Mahomes gets to 3 or 4, I think he goes down as the best
 

Braman

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
15,972
Reputation
3,747
Daps
63,678
I hate this label tbh. We just spent a decade calling Aaron Rodgers ‘the greatest thrower of the football’ and honestly wtf does that even mean. Unless you’re a QB who just never gets weapons or a defense, you need to be judged with chips taken into account. Not blindly, so of course Eli manning isn’t better than A Rod, but, for example, Joe Montana sure as hell is. And drew Brees is A Rod’s equal. Doesn’t matter who spun it better. Both got 1 ring both got gaudy stats. No more arbitrary labels

I say all that to say….Mahomes need chips to move up in all time discussions. I don’t gaf about how good it looks. Now if he wins this one :lupe: it’s spooky he’s way up there.

But if he loses :patrice:he’d have 1 ring despite 5 home AFC title games …and he’s no longer on a rookie deal. Plus a high likelihood that Allen, burrow, etc could tie him with 1 chip at any moment…hell hurts with 1 ring would be at his neck too
 

28 Gramz

How U Luv That???
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
11,300
Reputation
1,555
Daps
34,227
Reppin
Tre-4,North Carolina
I hate this label tbh. We just spent a decade calling Aaron Rodgers ‘the greatest thrower of the football’ and honestly wtf does that even mean. Unless you’re a QB who just never gets weapons or a defense, you need to be judged with chips taken into account. Not blindly, so of course Eli manning isn’t better than A Rod, but, for example, Joe Montana sure as hell is. And drew Brees is A Rod’s equal. Doesn’t matter who spun it better. Both got 1 ring both got gaudy stats. No more arbitrary labels

I say all that to say….Mahomes need chips to move up in all time discussions. I don’t gaf about how good it looks. Now if he wins this one :lupe: it’s spooky he’s way up there.

But if he loses :patrice:he’d have 1 ring despite 5 home AFC title games …and he’s no longer on a rookie deal. Plus a high likelihood that Allen, burrow, etc could tie him with 1 chip at any moment…hell hurts with 1 ring would be at his neck too

It's not just about the look with Mahomes. He's literally in 1st place for every major per game passing Stat in the playoffs.
 

Braman

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
15,972
Reputation
3,747
Daps
63,678
It's not just about the look with Mahomes. He's literally in 1st place for every major per game passing Stat in the playoffs.
Doesnt matter if he ain’t winning chips. Peyton had the numbers, Marino had numbers, Rodgers, etc. To be above everybody else at QB you gotta win chips or you’ll be in Aaron Rodgers territory with some random arbitrary title ‘Greatest thrower of the ball’ :heh: Even if you have stats if you don’t have chips you fade in QB convos see Peyton
 

Chip Skylark

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Messages
25,081
Reputation
4,390
Daps
69,915


Each made great points and I agree. Other than Brees ranking should be higher.

Pat has accomplished so much in his first 5 years that’s so far and away ahead of his peers you can’t argue it. He’s been the greatest QB of his generation by far!

Is he better than Favre, Jim Kelly, and Troy? Yes!

He’s a top QB all time
 

Chip Skylark

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Messages
25,081
Reputation
4,390
Daps
69,915
For the last time, QBing isn't just about throwing football. By yall logic Josh Allen is already better than Brady.

Yall act like bunch of swagnificent.

So what else does Pat need? Leadership? We’ve seen how he leads his team. He has all the intangibles that make a great player. He competed on a high ankle sprain twice and won both.

He’s been the chiefs leading rusher a few games. He has a 3.9 td:int ratio
 
  • Dap
Reactions: 19-

murksiderock

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
15,873
Reputation
7,084
Daps
49,103
Reppin
SMF and LAX to VA and NC
I hate this label tbh. We just spent a decade calling Aaron Rodgers ‘the greatest thrower of the football’ and honestly wtf does that even mean. Unless you’re a QB who just never gets weapons or a defense, you need to be judged with chips taken into account. Not blindly, so of course Eli manning isn’t better than A Rod, but, for example, Joe Montana sure as hell is. And drew Brees is A Rod’s equal. Doesn’t matter who spun it better. Both got 1 ring both got gaudy stats. No more arbitrary labels

I say all that to say….Mahomes need chips to move up in all time discussions. I don’t gaf about how good it looks. Now if he wins this one :lupe: it’s spooky he’s way up there.

But if he loses :patrice:he’d have 1 ring despite 5 home AFC title games …and he’s no longer on a rookie deal. Plus a high likelihood that Allen, burrow, etc could tie him with 1 chip at any moment…hell hurts with 1 ring would be at his neck too

Doesnt matter if he ain’t winning chips. Peyton had the numbers, Marino had numbers, Rodgers, etc. To be above everybody else at QB you gotta win chips or you’ll be in Aaron Rodgers territory with some random arbitrary title ‘Greatest thrower of the ball’ :heh: Even if you have stats if you don’t have chips you fade in QB convos see Peyton

Exactly, this thing that cats are doing where rings don't matter is some new shyt. They aren't the end-all be-all, but you aren't really in the conversation with 1, when the consensus Top 2 have 4 and 7...

Two get you in the conversation but Manning hurt himself as he didn't dominate either Super Bowl he won. Mahomes had a great 4thQ in the one he won but was mediocre for three quarters, let's say they win in 11 days but it's another game he doesn't really dominate. 2 has him in the mix but these nuances matter and when you're talking about comparing a Y6 player to the legends of the sport this type of shyt matters...

As of yet, Mahomes doesn't have a Super Bowl on par with '03 Brady (vs Carolina); '14 Brady (defeating the greatest defense in NFL history in historic fashion); '16 Brady (one-upped his '14 self with the greatest comeback ever); and '17 Brady (greatest QB performance in a loss in Super Bowl history)...

This is what we comparing Mahomes to, this is what dudes are arguing as better than, there's a lack of objectivity here based on "talent" and "skill". I haven't even started on Montana's legendary Super Bowl performances that Mahomes doesn't have an answer to, either...

For the hundredth time, I've been beating this drum for four years or so: Mahomes IS NOT the first quarterback we've been told is the "greatest talent" we've ever seen at the position. He's NOT the first guy we've been told is doing shyt that's never been done at the position before. There's literally a 40-year evolution at this position, there's a new guy every fukking generation where NFL heads jump out the window with the "wow, we've never seen anything like this before"...

In 1-6 years there will be another quarterback who will enter this league and cats will do the 😲 😱 shyt, "my God we've never seen a player this talented before". You can bank on this happening, it's gonna happen. Maybe this guy sits a year like Mahomes and we don't know immediately who he is. Maybe he takes 3 to 5 years to warm up like Favre and Rodgers, but when he finally warms up his presence is undeniable...

Maybe he's like Manning and is fukking garbage Y1 but from Y2 on you know you're playing with something different. Or maybe he's like Dan The Man and it's an instant introduction on some All-Time shyt...

That next guy, we don't know who he is yet, he could currently be in college and he may still be in high school somewhere. We don't know whether his announcement as an All-Timer will be instantaneous or take a few years. But one thing we know is there WILL BE A NEXT GUY who heads will tell you is a better "talent", has more "skill", can do more things with the football, than anybody who ever came before him.

And at that point, that "everyone before him" will include Patrick Mahomes, a transcendent, once-in-a-lifetime talent who was the most recent "best talent ever" title holder...

This is an important footnote on NFL history for literally the last 4 decades because it allows a person to keep context on what we're talking about with Mahomes (or anyone else)...

Below that threshold, there've been many, many talented, skillful QBs in this league. That alone doesn't make anything. The combination of historic level dominance (which Mahomes has so far) has to be matched with historic level championship play---->he doesn't have this yet. His greatest hits are ALL before the Super Bowl. His greatest hits aren't touching Brady's 4 greatest hits minimum, and possibly more if we start talking Brady's greatest championship game performances (he's played in 15 of em)...

To this point Mahomes' greatest hits aren't matching Montana's. These two have several apiece, that came at the biggest stage. Period. If Mahomes puts on an All-Time performance in 11 days it would still leave him below a conversation with those two, who have SEVERAL hallmark Super Bowl performances. One if Brady's came in a Super Bowl loss, so it doesn't necessarily matter if Mahomes loses the game, it's how does he actually play, but if he does this in 11 days we're still talking 1 such moment for him to two guys with multiple...

To your point, if he loses the Super Bowl, or he has another bad or subpar Super Bowl showing, win or loss. I know the Mahomes Stan Club on here doesn't wanna hypothesize either, but if he loses the Super Bowl he's 1-2 despite 5 consecutive home AFCCGs, Montana never lost a Super Bowl and Brady never had a losing Super Bowl record, Mahomes starts looking more Manning-ish. If they win or lose, but his play is weak or average well below his standards, we're talking 3 for 3 in Super Bowls that he wasn't really great in besides the back half of his first one...

Nothing changes that he's the best guy of this era by a wide margin, nothing changes that you can still have a legitimate conversation with him and other Top 10 GOATs. But we're having historical talk about him and entertaining that he is THE greatest QB ever. Cats gotta be objective with this shyt and not rush to crown people simply because they are fans...
 

FabTrey

Superstar
Joined
Apr 2, 2017
Messages
13,432
Reputation
-1,523
Daps
29,320
So what else does Pat need? Leadership? We’ve seen how he leads his team. He has all the intangibles that make a great player. He competed on a high ankle sprain twice and won both.

He’s been the chiefs leading rusher a few games. He has a 3.9 td:int ratio

Im very confident mahomes will end up top 3 breh.

But he aint brady yet. At least not yet.

My top 3

1. Brady



2a. Manning
2b. Montana


You gotta do more than putting up stats to pass manning and montana. You gotta dominate for 10+ years.

You gotta do unthinkable to pass brady. He gotta do the shyt he do in the SB. Remember brady beat mahomes twice in the playoffs. Took another team to SB.

And most importantly 35 playoff wins. Winning is everything for QB. Gotta win and dominate for 2 decades and consistently win. Just look at how quickly narrative changed for Rodgers. Mvps don't mean shyt. Pretty stats dont mean shyt.

Brady is Mt. Everest.
Mahomes right now aint even Mt. Rainier.

Your eye test don't mean shyt either.
 
Top