He passed Durant to me. Once he gets this finals mvp and another title he’ll be entering Kobe, Lebron and MJ territory the more he accomplishes after that.
He passed Durant to me. Once he gets this finals mvp and another title he’ll be entering Kobe, Lebron and MJ territory the more he accomplishes after that.
Right now dude is looking like a legit undisputed Finals MVP.
Despite what anybody says, it's somewhat arguable dude deserved one their first championship.
Last year it was Durant's, but Steph still contributed and opened up the floor for Durant by averaging 9 assists, 8 rebounds on top of 26 points.
Once he gets this one, I think he has a legit claim to top 2 ranking all-time.
I'd legit say dude is the best pg of all-time.
Keep in mind, dude may have another 2-3 titles on top of this one when it's all said and done.
Why neg him for a reasonable take? It's certainly realistic that Curry finishes as the GOAT PG when it's all said and done.Negged.
Curry might be top a 3 pg. He'll never be first stop it joe.
Why neg him for a reasonable take? It's certainly realistic that Curry finishes as the GOAT PG when it's all said and done.
That's not how it works, my breh.How ? Unless he gets more mvp titles, more points, more assists, more titles, more 1st nba all team etc, then yeah.
But it probably wont happen.
Magic goat pg. Nothing bad about being #2 tho
That's not how it works, my breh.
They're part of the equation, except it isn't as simple as "unless he gets more mvp titles, more points, more assists, more titles, more 1st nba all team".So players ranking arent based on their individual + team achievements/ trophies ?
Going off your neg count you've told a lot of truth....or notLol this dude yellowthoughts is so mentally soft. Imagine negging someone for telling the truth.
He already passed them.
They're part of the equation, except it isn't as simple as "unless he gets more mvp titles, more points, more assists, more titles, more 1st nba all team".
To keep a long story, short, when it comes to all-time rankings, players should be measured by their on-court play: skillset, ability, impact, and how long they maintained it for. Because when you start going by a bunch of narrative-based accolades and box score stats you muddy the waters over who's better, especially when you consider the talent pool is far greater today than during Magic's time, and that Curry's skillset is greater than Magic's too.
Curry's skillset is better than Magic's skillset ?.
You do realize that a basketball skillset is based primarily on shooting/scoring, right? So with that said, how can we put that "aside"?Shooting and scoring aside, what does he do better than magic ?
In a general manner, yes, Curry is better than Magic in those areas. Y'all dudes forget that Magic couldn't dribble with his left-hand, and he couldn't break down his defender with his dribble either (his go-to move was backing down smaller defenders with a live dribble - not taking them off the dribble - but using his frame as a shield), therefore, that restricted what type of playmaking he could do (especially given the era he played in), which was primarily pushing the ball in transition and feeding players when the double-team came in the half-court.Playmaking ? Handling the ball ? Passing the ball ?
Going off your neg count you've told a lot of truth....or not
Going off your neg count you've told a lot of truth....or not
Going off your neg count you've told a lot of truth....or not