Who Won the Debate? Bernie Sanders Gets the Edge
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/03/1...ate.html?_r=0&referer=https://www.google.com/
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/03/1...ate.html?_r=0&referer=https://www.google.com/
Me? Of all people? After four years where I was pragmatic on here to a fault? The point was not about politics it was about what was correct. And the way you posted made it seem as if you were co-signing that shyt....even though I assume you aren't. As you can see, the first response to me Napoleon of all people talking about "real politik." You know better than to have him cosigning you. I have posted on more than one occasion that he handled that question poorly.Of course its wrong. Of course America's foreign policy is wrong.
But if you cannot renounce your praise of a guy like Daniel Ortega back then, in 2016, you will get absolutely fukked in a general election.
Any of those tapes on Cuba and the USSR will slaughter him in purple states with hit pieces and in debates. That's just the reality of the situation.
you're so invested in this from a personal standpoint you can't see when Bernie is tanking himself, perhaps?
he did hold it down!!!!Goddamnit man. Bernie is one respectable son of a bytch.
Just hear how he talks about diplomatic relations and just politics in general.
Bern Bernie Bern
Bern breh!!!!!! Bern!!This is what gets me so tight about this fake pragmatism. Instead of being honest and stating that there was a lot of fukked up shyt in the bill that the Democratic party would've needed another decade or 2 to fix, Clinton is peddling it as if it was the "gold standard" or the great greek goddess p*ssyliath that only obstructionist were blind to vote against.
This is what bills look like when politicians are trying to secure their legacy.
It's all about getting something, anything passed, and letting real time market economics sort out the details.
So now when you're up for re-election, you get to go, "Hey look at that bill I passed." "You like it!? WELL WE'RE GOING TO STRENGTHEN IT "
Let's ignore the fact that Hillary supporters HAVE YET TO, AFTER A FULL WEEK AND A SEPARATE THREAD, tell us what progressive policies she can pass, that Obama and/or Sanders cannot. Right? Let's totally ignore that. The devil of politics isn't what you're able to secure but what YOU'RE WILLING TO GIVE UP.
She keeps missing that point. Her supporters keep missing that point. And it's not a point that they'll ever provide an answer for. They're going to give you some half assed, "You have to give to receive. Politics is about compromise," BS answer; totally ignoring that they wouldn't say that for something like womans wage equity.
She doesn't understand that every time Bernie pegs her about the Wall Street bailout, he's pegging her over the terms of the bailout. THAT IS THE FAILURE.
What about my future are you willing to risk in order to pass legislation? I say my future because this shyt isn't going to affect you. You've made 100million off of public speaking fees. If you live another 15 years, its a blessing. So when you walk into the room with republicans, who aren't going to give you shyt, what part of my future are you going to risk to ensure that you can say that you walked out of that room with bipartisanship consensus.
Cause we know the deal Obama struck for the bank bailout.
We know the public option was seen as toxic amongst democrat leadership for health care.
We know the private prison complex that was fortified with the crime bill and will now take another 25 years to dismantle.
We know what the deregulation of wall street led to.
We know SS has already been put on the bargaining table.
A republican was just held as bait for the SC nomination.
What concessions are you going to make, so I can prepare for this fight? Because not only will we be fighting against big money after you pass your bill, I'll now have to fight a generation of conservatives who will use the bill to legitimize their talking points by flipping it on you and saying,"See they agreed to our business philosophies. It's the liberal parts that are really wrong and are really holding us back."
This is what gets me so tight about this fake pragmatism. Instead of being honest and stating that there was a lot of fukked up shyt in the bill that the Democratic party would've needed another decade or 2 to fix, Clinton is peddling it as if it was the "gold standard" or the great greek goddess p*ssyliath that only obstructionist were blind to vote against.
This is what bills look like when politicians are trying to secure their legacy.
It's all about getting something, anything passed, and letting real time market economics sort out the details.
So now when you're up for re-election, you get to go, "Hey look at that bill I passed." "You like it!? WELL WE'RE GOING TO STRENGTHEN IT "
Let's ignore the fact that Hillary supporters HAVE YET TO, AFTER A FULL WEEK AND A SEPARATE THREAD, tell us what progressive policies she can pass, that Obama and/or Sanders cannot. Right? Let's totally ignore that. The devil of politics isn't what you're able to secure but what YOU'RE WILLING TO GIVE UP.
She keeps missing that point. Her supporters keep missing that point. And it's not a point that they'll ever provide an answer for. They're going to give you some half assed, "You have to give to receive. Politics is about compromise," BS answer; totally ignoring that they wouldn't say that for something like womans wage equity.
She doesn't understand that every time Bernie pegs her about the Wall Street bailout, he's pegging her over the terms of the bailout. THAT IS THE FAILURE.
What about my future are you willing to risk in order to pass legislation? I say my future because this shyt isn't going to affect you. You've made 100million off of public speaking fees. If you live another 15 years, its a blessing. So when you walk into the room with republicans, who aren't going to give you shyt, what part of my future are you going to risk to ensure that you can say that you walked out of that room with bipartisanship consensus.
Cause we know the deal Obama struck for the bank bailout.
We know the public option was seen as toxic amongst democrat leadership for health care.
We know the private prison complex that was fortified with the crime bill and will now take another 25 years to dismantle.
We know what the deregulation of wall street led to.
We know SS has already been put on the bargaining table.
A republican was just held as bait for the SC nomination.
What concessions are you going to make, so I can prepare for this fight? Because not only will we be fighting against big money after you pass your bill, I'll now have to fight a generation of conservatives who will use the bill to legitimize their talking points by flipping it on you and saying,"See they agreed to our business philosophies. It's the liberal parts that are really wrong and are really holding us back."
He wakes up to a cave bytch everyday.. if you ain't married or in a domestic relationship your not gonna understand where I'm coming fromNo, it does not. If that is your feeling, please explain how it does
I just realized Hillary has gotten that work for 3 of the past 4 days
As I already knew and said earlier about her Colin Powell claim. It is VERY disingenuous. There is only ONE reason that you would use a private server to funnel your email to. It is encrypted, which makes finding your deleted emails nearly impossible. Communications are usually archived later on. Hillary didn't want that to happen with some of her emails.Hillary lies about her emails even when she doesn't need to, can't wait till she catches a case.
Me? Of all people? After four years where I was pragmatic on here to a fault? The point was not about politics it was about what was correct. And the way you posted made it seem as if you were co-signing that shyt....even though I assume you aren't. As you can see, the first response to me Napoleon of all people talking about "real politik." You know better than to have him cosigning you. I have posted on more than one occasion that he handled that question poorly.