I've always believed that a superstar is someone who if you manage to take away their best weapon, they can still dominate the game, right? An entirely different level then your basic All star type players.
LeBron - Triple Double threat every night. Plays both ends. No explanation needed.
MJ - You take away his scoring, he's still locking down the oppositions best perimeter player and making plays for teammates.
Kobe - Just a knockoff MJ
Still the GOAT copycat
DWade - Shot isn't falling, he's still an amazing play-maker and underrated defender.
Westbrook - See LeBron.
Just a few examples. I look at Curry and I see a one dimensional player. When the 3 is falling, he's other worldly. When it's not, he's ineffective. I use to struggle calling KD a superstar too. If he isn't scoring, what does he give you? But his size and length (
) makes him effective outside of scoring on both ends of the floor and he's a underrated rebounder.
I'm curious as to what The coli's definition of a superstar is. Dominant two way players only? Players who dominate the game even when their primary weapon is taken away? Lets discuss.
LeBron - Triple Double threat every night. Plays both ends. No explanation needed.
MJ - You take away his scoring, he's still locking down the oppositions best perimeter player and making plays for teammates.
Kobe - Just a knockoff MJ
Still the GOAT copycatDWade - Shot isn't falling, he's still an amazing play-maker and underrated defender.
Westbrook - See LeBron.
Just a few examples. I look at Curry and I see a one dimensional player. When the 3 is falling, he's other worldly. When it's not, he's ineffective. I use to struggle calling KD a superstar too. If he isn't scoring, what does he give you? But his size and length (
) makes him effective outside of scoring on both ends of the floor and he's a underrated rebounder. I'm curious as to what The coli's definition of a superstar is. Dominant two way players only? Players who dominate the game even when their primary weapon is taken away? Lets discuss.
