Libya is in worst shape now than when Gaddafi was in charge

[MikelArteta]

Militias fighting for control of tripolis airport
http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Mi...-libya-truce-shattered-by-fresh-fighting.ashx

Arab League to hold emergency Libya meeting
http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/arab-league-hold-emergency-libya-meeting-231281662


Libya asks U.N. Security Council for help protecting oil, airports
http://news.yahoo.com/libya-asks-u-n-security-council-help-protecting-213028187.html

porous borders lead to illegal immigration boom and human trafficking
http://observers.france24.com/content/20140718-libya-borders-illegal-immigration-boom

Libya warns of failed state

http://news.iafrica.com/worldnews/949978.html



looking like iraq all over again

 

[Crakface]

Yea that was the point. Thats what cacs do.

 

[thekingsmen]

I predicted it on sohh in 2011. Others claimed it was best for the country that Gaddafi leave.

 

[True Weltch Media]

RIP to the Colonel And his family members that were killed

 

[wingzboy]

Same shyt with every Arab country that had an uprising. This is proof that in order to control a population of wild beasts, you need the ultimate demented savage beast, not fools on some democracy and human rights tip.

 

[thekingsmen]

Same shyt with every Arab country that had an uprising. This is proof that in order to control a population of wild beasts, you need the ultimate demented savage beast, not fools on some democracy and human rights tip.

Sorry my friend but those are people not beasts. Seeing that as such proves ignorance. Also there are Arab countries that weren't covered by mainstream media that didn't want the leaders you claim. Bahrain and Saudi Arabia are countries that the media ignored.

 

[MikelArteta]

Sorry my friend but those are people not beasts. Seeing that as such proves ignorance. Also there are Arab countries that weren't covered by mainstream media that didn't want the leaders you claim. Bahrain and Saudi Arabia are countries that the media ignored.

yep its amazing how the saudi royal family can escape all of this, dudes are worst than saddam and gaddafi combined, must be great to have america in your pocket

 

[wingzboy]

Sorry my friend but those are people not beasts. Seeing that as such proves ignorance. Also there are Arab countries that weren't covered by mainstream media that didn't want the leaders you claim. Bahrain and Saudi Arabia are countries that the media ignored.

As despicable and evil as Gaddafi was, the people who didn't want him were smacking him around and shoving a gun up his ass before they killed him. What difference is there between him and them? Saudi uprising was a minor one concerning a few shiites who are not even a fifth of the population. Then you had some other small groups too, it was nothing on the scale of the other countries. Bahrain on the other hand was from people who constituted the majority. I never said their people want the leader. My point is people who are very violent by nature can only be controlled by a more violent and more tyrannical force, as in with Saddam, Saudis, etc.

yep its amazing how the saudi royal family can escape all of this, dudes are worst than saddam and gaddafi combined, must be great to have america in your pocket

How are they worse than those two? Especially Gaddafi who sponsored a terrorism attacks against Americans and other innocent Westerners. Any country no matter how evil is given the blind eye if they satisfy America's needs one way or another.

 

[MikelArteta]

As despicable and evil as Gaddafi was, the people who didn't want him were smacking him around and shoving a gun up his ass before they killed him. What difference is there between him and them? Saudi uprising was a minor one concerning a few shiites who are not even a fifth of the population. Then you had some other small groups too, it was nothing on the scale of the other countries. Bahrain on the other hand was from people who constituted the majority. I never said their people want the leader. My point is people who are very violent by nature can only be controlled by a more violent and more tyrannical force, as in with Saddam, Saudis, etc.



How are they worse than those two? Especially Gaddafi who sponsored a terrorism attacks against Americans and other innocent Westerners. Any country no matter how evil is given the blind eye if they satisfy America's needs one way or another.

saudi royal family is sick and disgusting filth, regardless them being shia and the majority being shia doesn't change that.

Attack gaddafi but turn a blind eye to every us president who has committed attacks against innocents.

Gaddafi kept libya together, now its chaos and discord

 

[thekingsmen]

As despicable and evil as Gaddafi was, the people who didn't want him were smacking him around and shoving a gun up his ass before they killed him. What difference is there between him and them? Saudi uprising was a minor one concerning a few shiites who are not even a fifth of the population. Then you had some other small groups too, it was nothing on the scale of the other countries. Bahrain on the other hand was from people who constituted the majority. I never said their people want the leader. My point is people who are very violent by nature can only be controlled by a more violent and more tyrannical force, as in with Saddam, Saudis, etc.

.

1. You are defining Gaddafi as extremely evil with no proof.
2. You clearly aren't educated on leaders of the Middle East who were reformers of their nations and not dictators.
3. This shows you don't how many "uprisings" there were. There were several dozen protests and thousands of people show up. And on top of that, it's still going.
4. People can recognize a born leader, that has nothing to do with his violent intentions. Btw...Saddam got in charge of Iraq b/c of the U.S. who he use to work for. Gaddafi was a different person all together who created a bloodless coup( no violence).

 

[TayMarie]

Hidden Colors stated this man was killed because the African Union was going to create a central bank.

 

[wingzboy]

saudi royal family is sick and disgusting filth, regardless them being shia and the majority being shia doesn't change that.

Attack gaddafi but turn a blind eye to every us president who has committed attacks against innocents.

Gaddafi kept libya together, now its chaos and discord

Saudi royal family are shia now???

Saddam kept Iraq together, Saddam had also done a lot of reforming in Iraq during the 70s, he still was an evil twisted b*stard. What's your point?

1. You are defining Gaddafi as extremely evil with no proof.
2. You clearly aren't educated on leaders of the Middle East who were reformers of their nations and not dictators.
3. This shows you don't how many "uprisings" there were. There were several dozen protests and thousands of people show up. And on top of that, it's still going.
4. People can recognize a born leader, that has nothing to do with his violent intentions. Btw...Saddam got in charge of Iraq b/c of the U.S. who he use to work for. Gaddafi was a different person all together who created a bloodless coup( no violence).

LMAO! You clearly watched that one video of why Gaddafi is "good" and don't know much about what the fool got up to. The fool acknowledged he sponsored the lockerbie bombing, and willingly compensated the families and gave up all his weapons, if the blowing up of an airplane filled with innocent travelers is not enough to convince you that fool was a devilish b*stard then we have very different definitions of what constitutes "evil".

 

[Bawon Samedi]

[QUOTE="wingzboy, post: 9296989, member:]Same shyt with every Arab country that had an uprising. This is proof that in order to control a population of wild beasts, you need the ultimate demented savage beast, not fools on some democracy and human rights tip.[/QUOTE]

Even though your statement is crude and dehumanizing in a way; I have always held that democracy isn't for every country. And the west needs to understand this...

 

[wingzboy]

[QUOTE="wingzboy, post: 9296989, member:]Same shyt with every Arab country that had an uprising. This is proof that in order to control a population of wild beasts, you need the ultimate demented savage beast, not fools on some democracy and human rights tip.

Even though your statement is crude and dehumanizing in a way; I have always held that democracy isn't for every country. And the west needs to understand this...[/QUOTE]
The West is arrogant and presumes it knows best, which is why the USA flopped on their Iraq program despite their advanced technology and government institutions, yet a man from a backward village knew what he needed to do to keep Iraq stable, and did a good job too until the invasion.

 

[Rarely-Wrong Liggins]

Why let Bush have all the fun?