Man Can’t Get Heart Transplant Because He’s Not Vaccinated Against COVID

[FunkDoc1112]

-Once again. I never said I disagree with the doctors or didn't understand their reasons. My point had nothing to do with that.
-I was asked if I'd take the risk & I would. I obviously don't give a fukk about the rules medical professionals use to justify shyt they do.

...and that's why you're not a medical professional.

Muhfukkas really just want to hear themselves talk

 

[EndDomination]

You don't get the issue is forcing someone to take something that they don't want to take.

It's not odd for something new not to be trusted.
It's not odd for people to fight against something they feel is forced on them
It's not odd for people to be ok with one thing but not another.

They're not forcing him to do shyt.

He can either be a part of their voluntary organ transplant list system, and follow the precautions they set out for him, to ensure success, or he can not be a part of it.
Because he's either too stupid or too deluded to take the vaccine to protect against the virus at the heart (pun not intended) of a global pandemic - he's disqualified himself.

That's it. He's not being "forced."
@HarlemHottie why you dapping this moronic shyt?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Those scientists that are being trusted can and sometimes do fall victim to their own bad judgment.

But anti-vaxxers NEVER do, eh?

​

 

[Geordi]

People remain unvaxxed for several vastly differing reasons. His may be religious in which case he'd probably wish to return to his maker 'untainted.'

Do you believe the vaccine taints your soul?

 

[MyApps]

But anti-vaxxers NEVER do, eh?

​

Certainly never said that.

Anti vaxxers are asking questions.

But ALOT of Provaxxers do Noy

Antivaxxers want to make their own decisions.

While Provaxxers wish death upon others if they dont follow their views Given to them.

All the while having full on blind trust in Science, even tho mass media perpetuates one position while censoring the other.

Negating any potential for a fair, scientific discourse.

Let people make their own decisions.

Also,

CGMBS

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Antivaxxers want to make their own decisions.

The doctor made HIS own decision and is more than qualified to do so using science, logic, and reason.

The guy needing a heart made his decision to ignore sound medical advice to save his own life based on Facebook/IG/FOX News.

Giving him a new heart is like giving an unrepentant heroin addict new veins rather than a recovered addict of 10 years.

People die from COVID, not the vaccines. Convincing people there's more to fear from the vaccines than COVID leaves you NO room for any type of 'morality/ethics' argument and makes your entire stance hypocritical.​

 

[MyApps]

The doctor made HIS own decision and is more than qualified to do so using science, logic, and reason.

The guy needing a heart made his decision to ignore sound medical advice to save his own life based on Facebook/IG/FOX News.

Giving him a new heart is like giving an unrepentant heroin addict new veins rather than a recovered addict of 10 years.

People die from COVID, not the vaccines. Convincing people there's more to fear from the vaccines than COVID leaves you NO room for any type of 'morality/ethics' argument.​

A doctor can make suggestions about a procedure.

But a doctor cannot refuse service based on the opinion of the patient.

It's not illegal to not have the vaccine, the mandates were rejected by the Supreme Court.

Also, dirty little secret:

There are sales people who sell testing services and treatments to doctors. The doctors themselves don't know much about their services, only what it does and how it can increase their clientele.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

A doctor can make suggestions about a procedure.

But a doctor cannot refuse service based on the opinion of the patient.

He didn't base his decision on the patient's opinion. He based it on standard operating procedures for transplant patients.

OMFG!!! Did you just miss all the info posted in this thread??!!! No wonder you keep trying to argue.​

 

[MyApps]

The doctor made HIS own decision and is more than qualified to do so using science, logic, and reason.​

He didn't base his decision on the patient's opinion. He based it on standard operating procedures for transplant patients​

Which one is it?

Because my point was this

Also, dirty little secret:

There are sales people who sell testing services and treatments to doctors. The doctors themselves don't know much about their services, only what it does and how it can increase their clientele.

Now, the doctor obviously knows about transplant science.

But he had to be SOLD on the vaccine, by a sales person, in order to incorporate a new vaccine requirement as a part of the SOP.

So does he really know, or is he doing what he was told.

 

[MyApps]

Honestly, i don't even like arguing this much. But, I will be speaking up more as these implications become more common.

 

[Geordi]

Which one is it?

Because my point was this



Now, the doctor obviously knows about transplant science.

But he had to be SOLD on the vaccine, by a sales person, in order to incorporate a new vaccine requirement as a part of the SOP.

So does he really know, or is he doing what he was told.

What do you mean a sales person has to sell the vaccine to doctors?

 

[Able Archer 83]

The hospital can't speak on his specific case because that's against the law. I'm thinking him and his family are clout chasing. Either he was not high on the list and they think public pressure would force the hospital or another one to find him a heart, they're trying to get a gofundme, or he wants to be a martyr. This makes no sense at all.

Another Anthony Stokes situation.

A doctor can make suggestions about a procedure.

But a doctor cannot refuse service based on the opinion of the patient.

.



"Yo Doc, I've been having a lot of back pain lately. Aspirin just isn't cutting it. I need you to hook me up with a standing Oxycontin prescription."

 

[jwinfield]

Now, the doctor obviously knows about transplant science.

But he had to be SOLD on the vaccine, by a sales person, in order to incorporate a new vaccine requirement as a part of the SOP.

So he wasn't sold on any of the equipment or medicines involved in transplants, but he was sold on the vaccines?

But a doctor cannot refuse service based on the opinion of the patient.

So procedure and treatment should be set by the patient?

 

[MyApps]

Another Anthony Stokes situation.

.



"Yo Doc, I've been having a lot of back pain lately. Aspirin just isn't cutting it. I need you to hook me up with a standing Oxycontin prescription."

He's refusing to give the drug, not refusing his service. He would offer another drug instead.

Big difference.

 

[MyApps]

What do you mean a sales person has to sell the vaccine to doctors?

Most medical Doctors are not involved with the vaccine development phase, nor the clinical trials.

The doctors that you and I see have to be told, like everyone else, that the vaccine works the way it does. The doctors don't have hands-on experience with testing to counter what a sales person is saying.

So if it SOUNDS right, then doctors run with it.

This is why it's an issue when involving politics with hard science. Lobbyist pay politicians. Politicians align with lobbying companies to sign company favoring policies. Its just infiltrated science.