.People were only saying it was a best fit basketball wise and that has yet to be disputedIt's comedy how some people said Chiraq was best for him when he'd have to take a minimum of a $40M pay cut. Even if Rose and Noah weren't always hurt and he could win, no one is that stupid. Chase a rep when you can help your family out for madd years brehs/brehettes.
You got to hit this "girl" with the Doughboy from Boys N Tha Hood.People were only saying it was a best fit basketball wise and that has yet to be disputed
Nobody claimed Chicago could pay him more
Shut up
People were only saying it was a best fit basketball wise and that has yet to be disputed
Nobody claimed Chicago could pay him more
Shut up
and quote me saying anyone said the Bulls would pay him more
. Kind of reading comprehension is that?
I said people said that was the best place for him to go, even if he'd have to take a minimum of a $40M pay cut. SleazeSPN just said it would be a great story because he'd take half the money to win. @Somalilander just said it too.
Kind of logic is that? Even if Rose and Noah weren't always hurt and he could win, that would be the dumbest story of the year. The headlines should be “Winning is Not Worth a Minimum of a $40M Pay Cut”!If we really wanted to win he would've signed with Chicago.

Him saying saying he wants to win, and then signing with the Knicks is an insult to all of our intelligence. Speaking of money, why didn't he take the full max??? Not like they can sign a quality player with the crumbs he left on the table anyways.
With that extra million a year he left on the table, they signing Deandre Jordan next season!!!!With that extra million a year he left on the table, they signing Deandre Jordan next season!!!!

