Mexico Cancels Summit With Trump

Apollo Creed

Look at your face
Supporter
Joined
Feb 20, 2014
Messages
62,740
Reputation
15,659
Daps
233,286
Reppin
Handsome Boyz Ent
Cartels breh. :wow: Some of their savagery is even beyond ISIS sometimes.



Trump instigating a trade war with Mexico. :mjlol: What a fukking idiot.
Shouldnt the world or America be charging mexico with fixing the problem or else? Rhetorical question yeah i know
 

DrBanneker

Space is the Place
Joined
Jan 23, 2016
Messages
6,572
Reputation
5,875
Daps
23,830
Reppin
Figthing borg at Wolf 359
Shouldnt the world or America be charging mexico with fixing the problem or else? Rhetorical question yeah i know

For the most part of Mexico's problems, I agree but let's be honest: those drugs have a market and it ain't Mexicanos. Colombia cleaned up house and it passed to Mexico. Where would it go next? The Caribbean?
 

Breh13

Smh.
Supporter
Joined
Aug 5, 2015
Messages
13,831
Reputation
3,686
Daps
70,377
Shouldnt the world or America be charging mexico with fixing the problem or else? Rhetorical question yeah i know
Reducing the drug war should help.

These cartels have immense power and their savagery knows no bounds.
 

rantanamo

All Star
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
4,428
Reputation
520
Daps
8,177
Reppin
NULL
Why doesnt anyone ask why is mexico such a crappy place that their citizens even have to run away how they do?

Migration from Mexico to the US, legal and illegal is negative and has been falling for years. They are starting to become a manufacturing hub as prices in Asia rise and a logistics hub for goods entering the Americas. We get stories here all the time about people moving back to Mexico for jobs. The days of the free run to the US border were over a long time ago except in the minds of conservatives looking for votes.
 

Trajan

Veteran
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
18,821
Reputation
5,325
Daps
82,257
Reppin
Frankincense and Myrrh
Imagine if all of the United States was like the South. That's Mexico, basically.

in what sense?

The economists Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson have advanced an interesting theory which is very convincing. With regard to Mexico they basically say that when the scramble for the New World occurred Spain was in pole position since the aim was resources, exploitation and land. Spain got to the Americas first and locked down the biggest urban centers e.g Tenochtitlan since these were seen as the most valuable. More ppl to exploit and use for slave labour + the people were dripping in gold. By contrast the Brits were thought to have got the short end of the stick at the time and had to settle for the remainder: the sparsely populated modern day US where different tribes roamed and no large urban areas to speak of. (The authors present receipts of land population at that time).

This meant that the Brits had to bring over indentured servants (before slavery) to make something of the land. Because they found it difficult to control them, they had to compromise with them by giving them an increasing say in politics and a more inclusionary policy as far as the economy.

Meanwhile the Spanish instated a predatory system where the local populace was exploited for the benefit of the cac oligarchy in Mexico and the ruling classes in Spain. The system of encomienda

Encomienda - Wikipedia

The encomienda (Spanish pronunciation: [eŋkoˈmjenda]) was a labor system, rewarding conquerors with the labor of particular groups of people. It was first established in Spain during the Roman period, but utilized also following the Christian reconquest of Muslim territory. It was applied on a much larger scale during the Spanish colonization of the Americas and the Philippines. Conquered peoples were considered vassals of the Spanish monarch and the award of an encomienda was a grant from the crown to a particular individual. In the conquest era of the sixteenth century, the grants were considered to be a monopoly on the labor of particular Indians, held in perpetuity by the grant holder, called the encomendero, and his descendants

This continued indefinitely until the declaration of independence which was basically cacs in Mexico falling out with the cacs in the homeland. But the system never really stopped. There was never a revolution. The cacs just stayed as overlords but no longer wanted to give kickbacks to the cacs in Spain. The ruling classes never stopped being cacs.

This is the current president of Mexico :mjpls:

104241119-GettyImages-179644309.530x298.jpg

In other words, Mexico was never meant to be an equal inclusionary place with a government focused on the well-being of its citizenry. It was a project where cac overlords extract as much resource as possible while the locals remain peasants. It's not that the Mexicans are inept, the system is working superbly when viewed through the lens of its architects.
 
Last edited:

Geek Nasty

Brain Knowledgeably Whizzy
Supporter
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
31,987
Reputation
5,770
Daps
121,499
Reppin
South Kakalaka
Trump is a dumbass. Even IF you want that wall, shytting on someone to get it done isn't the way to make it happen.

But, I heard something sinister on the news yesterday. Trump might be throwing out all this buffoonery to distract from his real agenda. Every time something like this hits the headlines, make sure to check the back pages to see what's up.

Last time Trump decided to stop the FHA rate cut Obama announced, hardly a peep in the media too: Trump administration suspends FHA mortgage premium rate cut
 

The Odum of Ala Igbo

Hail Biafra!
Joined
Jan 16, 2014
Messages
17,969
Reputation
2,905
Daps
52,754
Reppin
The Republic of Biafra
The economists Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson have advanced an interesting theory which is very convincing. With regard to Mexico they basically say that when the scramble for the New World occurred Spain was in pole position since the aim was resources, exploitation and land. Spain got to the Americas first and locked down the biggest urban centers e.g Tenochtitlan since these were seen as the most valuable. More ppl to exploit and use for slave labour + the people were dripping in gold. By contrast the Brits were thought to have got the short end of the stick at the time and had to settle for the remainder: the sparsely populated modern day US where different tribes roamed and no large urban areas to speak of. (The authors present receipts of land population at that time).

This meant that the Brits had to bring over indentured servants (before slavery) to make something of the land. Because they found it difficult to control them, they had to compromise with them by giving them an increasing say in politics and a more inclusionary policy as far as the economy.

Meanwhile the Spanish instated a predatory system where the local populace was exploited for the benefit of the cac oligarchy in Mexico and the ruling classes in Spain. The system of encomienda

Encomienda - Wikipedia



This continued indefinitely until the declaration of independence which was basically cacs in Mexico falling out with the cacs in the homeland. But the system never really stopped. There was never a revolution. The cacs just stayed as overlords but no longer wanted to give kickbacks to the cacs in Spain. The ruling classes never stopped being cacs.

This is the current president of Mexico :mjpls:

104241119-GettyImages-179644309.530x298.jpg

In other words, Mexico was never meant to be an equal inclusionary place with a government focused on the well-being of its citizenry. It was a project where cac overlords extract as much resource as possible while the locals remain peasants. It's not that the Mexicans are inept, the system is working superbly when viewed through the lens of its architects.

Post of the month. You earned that rep.
 
Top