Microsoft: Kinect costs almost as Xbox One to make | BGR
The employee basically explains why the Kinect isn't optional. i think its pretty clear now that Microsoft won't renege on the Kinect pack in like they did on the DRM and that they consider it to basically be part of the Xbox One.
i've seen estimates that Sony is coming close to selling the PS4 at cost. Microsoft has to be losing at least $100 per Xbox One sold. they're probably losing more.
that's a huge loss to take and a decent chunk of marketshare to give up for something your core fans likely don't want or care about and something the casuals obviously aren't gonna be willing to pay the premium for.
The employee basically explains why the Kinect isn't optional. i think its pretty clear now that Microsoft won't renege on the Kinect pack in like they did on the DRM and that they consider it to basically be part of the Xbox One.
i've seen estimates that Sony is coming close to selling the PS4 at cost. Microsoft has to be losing at least $100 per Xbox One sold. they're probably losing more.
that's a huge loss to take and a decent chunk of marketshare to give up for something your core fans likely don't want or care about and something the casuals obviously aren't gonna be willing to pay the premium for.


You are going to need a LOT more people who even like the Kinect in the first place to get it to the "future of gaming" level. It's an add on device that Microsoft is trying to turn into more than a one trick pony. I don't think Microsoft should have made this a mandatory part of the new system. They losing money just adding it to the system. But we will see, but I think the Kinect is just another Powerglove.
But to answer your questions, Kinect will basically let you interact with your console in the same way Master Chief interacts with Cortana
And they'll actually take it that extra step in 2014 when they introduce those augmented reality glasses. Think about what I just said for a second. Look it up if you want, Fortaleza glasses 

