WaveWhisperer
Stainless Steel
Presence of Fathers to raise, groom, and provide example to their sons. Rites of passage would supplement that, because it would be your Dad acknowledging your status that would stamp your transition.
Presence of Fathers to raise, groom, and provide example to their sons. Rites of passage would supplement that, because it would be your Dad acknowledging your status that would stamp your transition.
Teaches you to be patient, attentive and stead fast. You don't want to neglect the plant it will die but you don't want to over water either.I like this
What are the benefits of planting veg and fruit do you reckon?
No I appreciate this a lot. I think it's important that the locales be taken into account. I've lived in the east coast most of my life. I spent a little time in FL but I could see where the differences would need to be noted. Knocking on doors to shovel snow was something we did do and I think that speaks to what you're saying .Think about your own city, the one you came up in.
What did you need to know as a man?
Design something around it.
I split my time between The East Coast and the South, and so the environment plays a part into expectations.
In Houston, a milestone was getting your driver's permit, then license, then car. I distinctly remember the first time I got on the freeway by myself.
NYC, it was taking the train by yourself. There was no handholding when I had to go grab something from fam in Manhattan.
If it came to violence, both spots had pistols. But in TX you ran into shotguns and rifles, and often not being held by someone your age and color, but by someone old, white, and sometimes a Fed. It's like you can reason with a 15 year old knucklehead, but not a 45 year old man, crushed bud light cans in teh background.
You might not have knocked doors in BK trying to mow some lawns.
You would in Houston. And that invites a danger that I didn't encounter in Flatbush.
The Masaai had one set of rituals, and the Somba people had something else.
The rites were shaped by their environments, their histories, and their beliefs.
That said, I don't get the sense TLR even really cares about this topic at all. I'm just rapping into the ether.







A lot of BLACK BOYS do not have actual developmental differences, they have perceived development differences.
If the teachers WEREN'T RACIST, they would not be sending Rakim n'nem to get an IEP.
![]()
New studies challenge the claim that black students are sent to special ed too much
Two new quantitative studies find disproportionality in special education due to black, and Hispanic, students under-identified for disabilities at schoolhechingerreport.org
![]()
Black Children at White Schools Are More Likely to Be Told They Have a Learning Disability
Disability classifications in the U.S. are subjective and inconsistent, and prone to bias based on context.www.vice.com
![]()
Confronting special education’s race problem
umdearborn.edu
This not new, nor is it news.
As Granny would say, "There's nothing wrong with the boy".
I can only take that pushing a topic about Black Boys and Rites of Passage into Black Manhood as an at attempt to derail the conversation, and push that white dude's agenda.
The paper you cite does not squarely address the mountain of evidence that's out there.
The fact that some "diverse" kids did well a year later, doesn't even attempt to address racism INHERENT in teaching Black Children, in particular Black Boys.
It in effect says that parents should keep their black boys at home a year long to combat effects of known racism.
That's not an argument you should be making, imo.
Why do you think this is?
Why are black boys so dis interested in these programs?
So there would be a class with nothing but boys learning exactly what? While the girls are getting even further ahead than them anyway. Seems counterintuitive.
Children being prepared for school should be a parent's duty anyhow.
Trueyall talking about building campfires and shyt but that's not what we're missing.

So in the example above there is training then you would have the initiation. Where in middle of night you are ripped from your bed to represent being ripped from your mother and then you have to survive. The training needed in modern times would be much different but how would you perform the initiation also?In other cultures, a boy is trained by his father, male kin and other men in his group to survive on the land. So when it comes time for his rite of passage, he is sent/left far away from the village, and has to survive.
If/When he comes home, he's ready to do what needs to be done. He's proven it to himself, and to others. He has the skills. And he has the determination to see things through.
- Build a shelter
- Find water
- Gather food
- Hunt and Trap
- Protect himself from animals and the elements
How does that translate to an urban society, to the Black Man in America?
That's where I would start.
I would have to dig in crates but most dont touch these topics too much because the medium of yt basically punishes you for bringing it up. You wont get views, so most wont touch it. I have seen BGS do things on anima/animus in past. Only time I have seen it is if going thru the blog era stuff and they bring up manhood in the making. Black Brain Trust had a great series touching on stuff like this, got less than 300 views. They breakdown the book Archetypal Dimensions Of the Psyche by Marie-Louise von Franz (analyst and disciple of Carl Jung)I wonder if Tom Curry or T. Hasan Johnson has weighed in on this?
The intellectual wing of the Black Manosphere, to my tastes, spends WAY TOO MUCH TIME talking about Feminism, Black Feminists, and the victimization of Black Men.

Why do you think this is?
Why are black boys so dis interested in these programs?
His point is that many "deficiencies" that black boys have is due in part to them coming up in a racist system that targets them more than any other group. Period. Even more so, many of the very same studies that are used to show how poorly black boys are doing and are used as justifications for what amounts to calls for remedial education for black boys social consequences be damned are based off of black boy's performance in a racist system that targets them in the first place. It's like trusting the judgment of a racist on anything involving a black person. It makes little sense. Everything I see mentioned is done to ignore the ones being racist and put the blame on the black boys. One might as well say it is because they are inferior, not because the system actively works to sabotage them. It's almost like saying an immigrant child does better than a lot of ADOS children because ADOS kids aren't ready. And while I understand that fixing the system in itself is much harder and that solutions should be had to counter the effects until then, creating a system that effectively punishes these boys is not a good one. Home-schooling in itself could probably be better or a long-term planning approach to education that I underwent would be a lot better.You claim "a lot of Black boys do not have actual developmental differences" and then you go on to link three articles, one of which challenges the validity of the other two.
I'm talking about developmental differences, differences in brain maturation between boys and girls. We see a gap between white girls and white boys as well (because the developmental difference is related to sex). I'm not talking about learning disabilities or kids being placed in special education. I agree these are problems just as I agree that Black children face racism that their white counterparts do not in learning institutions but that is a separate issue.
I'm not attempting to derail the conversation, I only brought this up to challenge the notion that boys are doing fine in this society, it's simply untrue. I am not arguing that parents should keep their boys home to combat racism, I'm arguing that they should keep their boys at home so they are better equipped when they do enter kindergarten.