Net Neutrality: The War To Destroy the Internet
- Thread starter Recca Gatsby
- Start date
AT&T's statement:
by AT&T Blog Team
December 14, 2017 at 1:16pm
The following may be attributed to Bob Quinn, AT&T Senior Executive Vice President of External & Legislative Affairs:
“For more than a decade, under both Republican and Democratic Administrations, AT&T has consistently made clear that we provide broadband service in an open and transparent way. We do not block websites, nor censor online content, nor throttle or degrade traffic based on the content, nor unfairly discriminate in our treatment of internet traffic. These principles, which were laid out in the FCC’s 2010 Open Internet Order and fully supported by AT&T, are clearly articulated on our website and are fully enforceable against us. In short, the internet will continue to work tomorrow just as it always has. Despite the existence and the enforceability of all of these commitments, we have, since 2010, also repeatedly called for a non-Title II legislative solution that would make these consumer protections permanent. We continue to support a legislative solution and will work with any interested members of Congress to achieve that solution.”
by AT&T Blog Team
December 14, 2017 at 1:16pm
The following may be attributed to Bob Quinn, AT&T Senior Executive Vice President of External & Legislative Affairs:
“For more than a decade, under both Republican and Democratic Administrations, AT&T has consistently made clear that we provide broadband service in an open and transparent way. We do not block websites, nor censor online content, nor throttle or degrade traffic based on the content, nor unfairly discriminate in our treatment of internet traffic. These principles, which were laid out in the FCC’s 2010 Open Internet Order and fully supported by AT&T, are clearly articulated on our website and are fully enforceable against us. In short, the internet will continue to work tomorrow just as it always has. Despite the existence and the enforceability of all of these commitments, we have, since 2010, also repeatedly called for a non-Title II legislative solution that would make these consumer protections permanent. We continue to support a legislative solution and will work with any interested members of Congress to achieve that solution.”
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Cotdamn.
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
@NameisAdamusWhen the majority are conservatives ofc liberal agendas will take Ls idiot
@NameisAdamus
@NameisAdamus
@NameisAdamus
Ayo the FCC chairman was initially appointed by OBAMA.
AND WATCH YOUR FUYCKIN MOUTH YOU LITTLE NERD. YOU CAN REPLY TO POST WITNOUT THE STUPID shyt. IN REAL LIFE I WOULD DUST YOUR bytch ASS FOR TALKING RECKLESS.
ReggieFlare
Superstar
Is there any way we can vote against this?
ORDER_66
The Fire Rises 2023
I think it ends up with what your state you live in
A thing like this won't fly in Cali especially with Silicon Valley there
