It's not "my article," you retard. It's a summation of 3,000 clinical studies and 40 years of medical research on acupuncture. What is not registering in your brain about that? Even if you don't read that particular article, you're not interested in reading actual medical data on acupuncture...all that article is is a statement on the collective conclusions of that data.
You are not interested in knowledge regarding acupuncture at all. That is a fact. If you were, you would actually explore the medical research and clinical trials on acupuncture,which are abundant. You won't do that because you are interested in believing things that make you feel better, like a child who believes in the tooth fairy, as opposed to knowledge for the sake of learning.

You moron.
What you still don't seem to understand is that "x has been done for x amount of years, so therefore it works" is by definition not a logical claim. That goes for acupuncture, bloodletting, gold as main currency, and everything you use this idiotic defense of. People still sacrifice animals in order to try and make crops grow or whatever, and have done so for thousands of years.
Don't talk about logic, because if you took a class on logic, they would teach your dumb ass that that is not logical. It is by definition a logical fallacy, known as "appeal to tradition."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_tradition
Here's a link broken down to a level that you can understand...maybe.
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-tradition.html