our D was worked for 30+ points with Brooks AND Aldon before. we had ZERO depth behind them. how can you say this shyt ?its so fukking insulting to what brooks and aldon meant to our team before we got depth in skuta and lemonier.
can you even name guys who came in for hali and houston ?
like Ive said, you clearly have bias. you seem ( dont want to put words in your mouth) believe that defense is a unit but qbs and wrs are somehow not. I think all positions are equal, so you saying losing two of the most dominant players on the defensive side of the ball shouldnt make your d crumble isto me.
colts lost wayne and look how they are on offense. and if they lost luck and wayne ? how would they look ? how would we look without VD and Boldin right now ?
losing two OLBS on a team that lives and dies with pass rush isnt any different than losing your top two passing targets on a team that lives and dies with the pass. or WR and a QB.
Im sorry, there isnt much difference- all of it comes from bias towards qbs and offense. youll be the first one defending kaep about receivers not getting open with no VD and Boldin....but you are saying that kc defense shouldve been putting clamps on a good qb and a good offense without their two best players ?
I may have a bias in thinking that QB is probably the most important position on the team. You are also in biased by your "QB is just another guy on the team" thinking as well. I mean, You're telling me Houston is more important than Rodgers so where can we really go from here?
I also never said or even alluded to KC defense putting the clamps on Rivers or the Chargers. When did that ever occur?
the rams
