Who was on that Olympic team when they didnt get the gold?
Who was on the redeem team?
*No jinx*If Timmy wins his 5th ship can we put him ahead of Kobe as....
- Thread starter GoFlipAPack
- Start date
Who was on that Olympic team when they didnt get the gold?
Who was on the redeem team?
Kobes Two Jerseys
8 or 24 best player of the era
Kobes Two Jerseys
8 or 24 best player of the era
But you brought it up. So what was the point?That's not at all what I said, but okay run with it....
Comparing those two teams are unfair...
These nikkaz is honestly tryna argue this, look I get it we were jerks when the season started and have always been spoiled, pompous stans because our GOAT franchise and shooting gawd have showered us with memorable title runs and it makes yall 
but 
, yall gon just deny the truth so you can hate on Kobe? Let it go brehs, appreciate while yall still can. 
but , yall gon just deny the truth so you can hate on Kobe? Let it go brehs, appreciate while yall still can.
Kobes Two Jerseys
8 or 24 best player of the era
Doesn't matter. Isn't the big arguing point for Duncan is that hes won 4 rings with no superstars?
Now its about whos on the team?
You misinterpreted what I said. I said the Lakers put talent around Kobe when he asked for it, Duncan just happened to get players who ended up flourishing around him. That's the difference, I didn't use it as a knock on Kobe....
These nikkaz is honestly tryna argue this, look I get it we were jerks when the season started and have always been spoiled, pompous stans because our GOAT franchise and shooting gawd have showered us with memorable title runs and it makes yall
and no the Lakers are not the GOAT franchises....
05-05are you sure you want to say that? Keep in mind we are comparing a big and a guard here. Dont get foolish.
Somehow this gets lost when people were arguing that Duncan being an elite big man in 2010 or whatever means the same thing as Kobe being a top 3 player period when the best players in the NBA are nearly all wing players.
Let me ask you something, if Joe Johnson was averaging 20 5 and 5 and he was giving you the best SG numbers in the league and Kobe was averaging 18 5 and 5
and Tim Duncan is giving you 26 and 12 and other big men are giving you 25 and 10 and 24 and 12, would compare their dominance relative to their position and the NBA in general remotely the same that year....
So how were Duncan fans allowed to get away with that shyt all of last week by using that "still a top big man argument" in the worst era for big men in the history of the NBA....
Nobody has argued Tim Duncan was better than Kobe Bryant since 05 BTW, stop it. Duncan was still top 3 to 5 up until 2008, but that was the beginning of that Kobe-LeBron (and sometimes Wade) argument. Stop it.
Duncan averaged 20 and 11 in the 2008 playoffs on 45% shooting (as a big man) Kobe was averaged 30 6 and 6 on 48% (even after Boston). This hasn't been worth discussing for 5 years.
Doesn't matter. Isn't the big arguing point for Duncan is that hes won 4 rings with no superstars?
Kobes Two Jerseys
8 or 24 best player of the era
Exactly. You can't answer the question because it goes against earlier arguments made for Tim. "Duncan won with no superstars". Ok great. Wheres the gold medal? "He didn't have much help".
AlbertPullhoez
The Takeover
Stop it. Duncan didn't steal a MVP from Jason Kidd
Duncan's 2002 season: 25.5 ppg, 12.7 rpg, 51% from the field, 58 wins
Kidd: 14.7 ppg, 9.9 apg, 39%from the field, 50 wins
Sent from my HTC Wildfire S using Tapatalk 2
Exactly. You can't answer the question because it goes against earlier arguments made for Tim. "Duncan won with no superstars". Ok great. Wheres the gold medal? "He didn't have much help".
yea but your talking about the OLYMPICS. A team composed of 12-15 of the BEST players in the NBA