NYT: Boeing Was Certifying Its Own Safety For the 737 Max

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,321
Reputation
4,570
Daps
89,520
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
NYT: Boeing Was Certifying Its Own Safety For the 737 Max

The regulator had been passing off routine tasks to manufacturers for years, with the goal of freeing up specialists to focus on the most important safety concerns. But on the Max, the regulator handed nearly complete control to Boeing, leaving some key agency officials in the dark about important systems like MCAS, according to the current and former employees...The company performed its own assessments of the system, which were not stress-tested by the regulator.

Turnover at the agency left two relatively inexperienced engineers overseeing Boeing's early work on the system. The F.A.A. eventually handed over responsibility for approval of MCAS to the manufacturer. After that, Boeing didn't have to share the details of the system with the two agency engineers...

Late in the development of the Max, Boeing decided to expand the use of MCAS, to ensure the plane flew smoothly. The new, riskier version relied on a single sensor and could push down the nose of the plane by a much larger amount. Boeing did not submit a formal review of MCAS after the overhaul. It wasn't required by F.A.A. rules... The agency ultimately certified the jet as safe, required little training for pilots and allowed the plane to keep flying until a second deadly Max crash, less than five months after the first.... By 2018, the F.A.A. was letting the company certify 96 percent of its own work, according to an agency official.
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,321
Reputation
4,570
Daps
89,520
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
You when gov't has regulations/regulators: :scust:

You when those same regulators give the private sector the ability to police themselves: :scust:

Also you when those regulations/regulators actually do they job: :scust:
It’s a question of accountability... something extremely lacking in government or markets with heavy government involvement.

Has anyone even gone to jail yet?:picard:
shyt is disgusting.
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,321
Reputation
4,570
Daps
89,520
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
I know you like to act like you aren't a full blown republican, but this is largely due to republicans continually cutting the budget for the FAA.
Nah, everything I’ve read has suggested management at the FAA delegated responsibility to Boeing as part of a long standing policy and trusting relationship. Lack of funding played no part.
In fact if the NYT is to be believed letting Boeing self regulate was a congress backed policy.:scust:
Trust government to act in your best interest out here Brehs

After Boeing Crashes, Sharp Questions About Industry Regulating Itself
FAA boss says it let Boeing partly self-regulate the software thought to be behind both fatal 737 Max crashes

 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
47,757
Reputation
7,272
Daps
151,728
Reppin
CookoutGang
Nah, everything I’ve read has suggested management at the FAA delegated responsibility to Boeing as part of a long standing policy and trusting relationship. Lack of funding played no part.
In fact if the NYT is to be believed letting Boeing self regulate was a congress backed policy.:scust:
Trust government to act in your best interest out here Brehs

After Boeing Crashes, Sharp Questions About Industry Regulating Itself
FAA boss says it let Boeing partly self-regulate the software thought to be behind both fatal 737 Max crashes
Sounds like deregulation. Something you support.

But like a typical conservative when she doesn't fall in line with your fantasy you look to deflect blame.

:scust:
 

PoorAndDangerous

Superstar
Joined
Feb 28, 2018
Messages
9,558
Reputation
1,152
Daps
34,546
Nah, everything I’ve read has suggested management at the FAA delegated responsibility to Boeing as part of a long standing policy and trusting relationship. Lack of funding played no part.
In fact if the NYT is to be believed letting Boeing self regulate was a congress backed policy.:scust:
Trust government to act in your best interest out here Brehs

After Boeing Crashes, Sharp Questions About Industry Regulating Itself
FAA boss says it let Boeing partly self-regulate the software thought to be behind both fatal 737 Max crashes
Lol so what's the alternative? Allow the company to regulate themselves which is essentially what happened here?? I mean you're literally making the case for regulation
 

greenvale

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Aug 1, 2017
Messages
6,602
Reputation
2,051
Daps
25,902
Reppin
Delaware
Nah, everything I’ve read has suggested management at the FAA delegated responsibility to Boeing as part of a long standing policy and trusting relationship. Lack of funding played no part.
In fact if the NYT is to be believed letting Boeing self regulate was a congress backed policy.:scust:
Trust government to act in your best interest out here Brehs

After Boeing Crashes, Sharp Questions About Industry Regulating Itself
FAA boss says it let Boeing partly self-regulate the software thought to be behind both fatal 737 Max crashes
After Boeing Crashes, Sharp Questions About Industry Regulating Itself

One factor in the debate is the F.A.A.’s budget. If Congress wanted the government to handle more certification work without slowing down the approval of new planes, lawmakers would most likely need to drastically increase funding for the F.A.A. so it could expand its staff. Instead, Congress has encouraged the F.A.A. to delegate more certification work to manufacturers.

A report accompanying a spending bill last year said that utilizing the F.A.A.’s program for delegating authority to manufacturers was “key to improving the effectiveness and efficiency of product certification.”

“Ideally, if resources are no constraint, you would want the regulator to be doing it all,” said Christopher A. Hart, a former F.A.A. official and National Transportation Safety Board chairman. “But this isn’t the ideal world and resources are constrained.”

Sounds like this relates to funding to me.
 
Top